Psychologia kibicowania

Aaron C. T. Smith; Łukasz M. Plęs

doi:10.18778/8445-085-7

Słowa kluczowe: myślenie w kategoriach sportu, wiara w sport, sportowe emocje, znaczenie sportu, kibicowanie

Opublikowane: 21 października 2026

Kategorie: Psychologia

Pliki do pobrania

E-book fragment

Epub fragment

Mobi fragment

W Psychologii kibicowania ukazano złożone psychologiczne mechanizmy leżące u podstaw zachowań kibiców, w tym kształtowanie się przekonań i więzi emocjonalnych oraz rolę rytuałów. Autor wyjaśnia, dlaczego sport budzi ogromne emocje w różnych kulturach i grupach społecznych, w jaki sposób nadaje życiu sens, buduje tożsamość i tworzy wspólnotę, stanowiąc nieodłączny element ludzkiego życia. Docieka również, jak kibicowanie zaspokaja podstawowe potrzeby psychiczne, społeczne i kulturowe, wskazując na paralele między sportem a kultem religijnym. Szczegółowo analizuje, w jaki sposób przekonania związane ze sportem są zestrojone z naturalnymi mechanizmami działania mózgu, a w efekcie jak skutkuje to wzmocnieniem u kibiców poczucia satysfakcji, komfortu i przynależności do wspólnoty. Oprócz tego omawia wpływ błędów poznawczych, odporności emocjonalnej oraz społecznych aspektów sportu, co pozwala w pełni zrozumieć, dlaczego sport tak fascynuje i ma tak ogromne znaczenie.

Książka ta różni się od większości opracowań poświęconych kibicowaniu, które skupiają się raczej na tym, jak zachowują się kibice, a nie na tym, dlaczego tak jest. Posługując się przykładami zaczerpniętymi z Europy i Ameryki Północnej, a także z rozwijających się rynków sportowych w Australii i Azji, autor analizuje w niej zarówno podobieństwa, jak i różnice w zjawisku kibicowania oraz uwzględnia wpływ najnowszych technologii cyfrowych wykorzystywanych w sporcie.

Psychologia kibicowania jest adresowana do entuzjastów sportowej rywalizacji i wszystkich zainteresowanych kibicowaniem, psychologią i socjologią sportu oraz zarządzaniem w sporcie.

Aaron C. T. Smith - Loughborough University

Aaron C. T. Smith jest profesorem w Newcastle Business School na Uniwersytecie w Newcastle oraz specjalistą w zakresie zarządzania i innowacyjności w sporcie w Institute for Sport Business na Loughborough University w Londynie. Ponadto prowadzi firmę Sporting Cognition Ltd., która zajmuje się badaniem zdolności poznawczych sportowców i kibiców.

Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, s. 1109–1116.

Alcorta, C. S., Sosis, R. (2005). Ritual, emotion, and sacred symbols. Human Nature, 16(4), s. 323–335.

Ambady, N., Bharucha, J. (2009). Culture and the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(6), s. 342–345.

Ambler, T., Braeutigam, S., Stins, J., Rose, S., Swithenby, S. (2004). Salience and choice: Neural correlates of shopping decisions. Psychology & Marketing, 21(4), s. 247–261.

Andersen, S. C., Hjortskov, M. (2015). Cognitive biases in performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), s. 647–662.

Aoki, C., Romeo, R. D., Smith, S. S. (2017). Adolescence as a critical period for developmental plasticity. Brain Research, 1654, s. 85–86.

Austin, J. (1998). Zen and the brain. MIT Press.

Barnes, J. L. (2015). Fanfiction as imaginary play: What fan-written stories can tell us about the cognitive science of fiction. Poetics, 48, s. 69–82.

Bell, V., Halligan, P. W. (2013). The neural basis of abnormal personal belief. W: F. Krueger, J. Grafman (red.), The neural basis of human belief systems (s. 191–224). Hove Psychology Press.

Belle, N., Cantarelli, P., Belardinelli, P. (2017). Cognitive biases in perfor¬mance appraisal: Experimental evidence on anchoring and halo effects with public sector managers and employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(3), s. 275–294.

Bernardin, H. J., Thomason, S., Buckley, M. R., Kane, J. S. (2016). Rater rating-level bias and accuracy in performance appraisals: The impact of rater personality, performance management competence, and rater accountability. Human Resource Management, 55(2), s. 321–340.

Bol, J. C. (2011). The determinants and performance effects of managers’ performance evaluation biases. Accounting Review, 86(5), s. 1549–1575.

Boyd, R. T., Richerson, P. J. (2009). Culture and the evolution of human cooper¬ation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1533), s. 3281–3288.

Bracha, A., Brown, D. J. (2012). Affective decision making: A theory of optimism bias. Games and Economic Behavior, 75, s. 67–80.

Breuer, K., Nieken, P., Sliwka, D. (2013). Social ties and subjective performance evaluations: An empirical investigation. Review of Managerial Science, 7(2), s. 141–157.

Browne, M., Thomson, P., Rockloff, M. J., Pennycook, G. (2015). Going against the herd: Psychological and cultural factors underlying the ‘vaccination confidence gap’. PLoS One, 10(9), e0132562.

Buhrmester, M., Fraser, W. T., Lanman, J. A., Whitehouse, H., Swann, W. B. (2015). When terror hits home: Identity fused Americans who saw Boston bombing victims as ‘family’ provided aid. Self and Identity, 14(3), s. 253–270.

Burton-Chellew, M. N., West, S. A. (2012). Pseudocompetition among groups increases human cooperation in a public goods game. Animal Behaviour, 84(4), s. 947–952.

Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., Haggard, P. (2005). Action observations and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, s. 1243–1249.

Cavojov, A. V., Srol, J., Jurkovič, C. M. (2020). Why should we try to think like scientists? Scientific reasoning and susceptibility to epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive biases. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), s. 85–95.

Choi, J.-K., Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318(5850), s. 636–640.

Cohen, E. L., Atwell Seate, A., Anderson, S. M., Tindage, M. F. (2017). Sport fans and Sci-Fi fanatics: The social stigma of popular media fandom. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 6(3), s. 193–207.

Connors, M. H., Halligan, P. W. (2015). A cognitive account of belief: A tentative road map. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, s. 1–14.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row [wyd. polskie: M. Csíkszentmihályi (2005). Przepływ. Psychologia optymalnego doświadczenia. Tłum. M. Wajda-Kacmajor. Moderator].

D’Acremont, M., Schultz, W., Bossaerts, P. (2013). The human brain encodes event frequencies while forming subjective beliefs. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(26), s. 10887–10897.

Damasio, A. R. (2000). Thinking about belief. W: D. L. Schacter, E. Scarry (red.), Memory, brain and belief (s. 325–334). Harvard University Press.

Decety, J., Pape, R., Workman, C. I. (2018). A multilevel social neuroscience perspective on radicalization and terrorism. Social Neuroscience, 13(5), s. 511–529.

Delfgaauw, J., Souverijn, M. (2016). Biased supervision. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 130, s. 107–125.

Diesendruck, G. (2013). Essentialism: The development of a simple, but potentially dangerous, idea. W: M. Banaji, S. Gelman (red.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (s. 263–268). Oxford University Press.

Duarte, I. C., Afonso, S., Jorge, H., Cayolla, R., Ferreira, C., Castelo-Branco, M. (2017). Tribal love: The neural correlates of passionate engagement in foot¬ball fans. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(5), s. 718–728.

Dwyer, B., Slavich, M. A., Gellock, J. L. (2018). A fan’s search for meaning: Testing the dimensionality of sport fan superstition. Sport Management Review, 21(5), s. 533–548.

Erikstad, M. K., Johansen, B. T. (2020). Referee bias in professional football: Favoritism toward successful teams in potential penalty situations. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2, 19.

Falk, E. B., Lieberman, M. D. (2012). The neural bases of attitudes evaluations and behavior change. W: F. Krueger, J. Grafman (red.), The neural basis of human belief systems (s. 71–94). Taylor & Francis Psychology Press.

Ferris, D. L., Reb, J., Lian, H., Sim, S., Ang, D. (2018). What goes up must… keep going up? Cultural differences in cognitive styles influence evaluations of dynamic performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), s. 347–358.

Findlay, L. C., Ste-Marie, D. M. (2004). A reputation bias in figure skating judging. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26(1), s. 154–166.

Freeman, D., Dunn, G., Garety, P. A., Bebbington, P., Slater, M., Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., Green, C., Jordan, J., Ray, K. (2005). The psychology of persecutory ideation I: A questionnaire survey. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(5), s. 302–308.

Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, s. 127–138.

Galbraith, N., Manktlow, K. (2014). A psychological model of delusional belief: Integrating reasoning biases with perceptual, self-concept and emotional factors. W: N. Galbraith (red.), Aberrant beliefs and reasoning (s. 19–45). Psychology Press.

Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), s. 295–314.

Halligan, P. (2007). Belief and illness. Psychologist, 20(6), s. 358–361.

Hamstra, M. R. (2014). ‘Big’ men: Male leaders’ height positively relates to followers’ perception of charisma. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, s. 190–192.

Han, S., Northoff, G., Vogeley, K., Wexler, B. E., Kitayama, S., Varnum, M. E. (2013). A cultural neuroscience approach to the biosocial nature of the human brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, s. 335–359.

Hare, B. (2017). Survival of the friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), s. 155–186.

Haselton, M. G., Nettle, D. (2006) The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), s. 47–66.

Hogg, M. A., Kruglanski, A., van den Bos, K. (2013). Uncertainty and the roots of extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), s. 407–418.

Horgan, J. (2014). The psychology of terrorism (wyd. II). Routledge.

Howlett, J. R., Paulus, M. P. (2015). The neural basis of testable and non-test¬able beliefs. PloS One, 10(5), s. 1–17.

Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J. B., Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20(3), s. 385–392.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan [wyd. polskie: D. Kah¬neman (2012). Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym. Tłum. P. Szymczak. Media Rodzina].

Kashima, Y., McKintyre, A., Clifford, P. (1998). The category of the mind: Folk psychology of belief, desire, and intention. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(3), s. 289–313.

Kitayama, S., Uskul, A. K. (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, s. 419–449.

Knowles, R., McCarthy-Jones, S., Rowse, G. (2011). Grandiose delusions: A review and theoretical integration of cognitive and affective perspectives. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(4), s. 684–696.

Kovács, Á. M., Kühn, S., Gergely, G., Csibra, G., Brass, M. (2014). Are all beliefs equal? Implicit belief attributions recruiting core brain regions of theory of mind. PloS One, 9(9), e106558.

Kruger, D. J., Falbo, M., Blanchard, S., Cole, E., Gazoul, C., Nader, N., Murphy, S. (2018). University sports rivalries provide insights on coalitional psychology. Human Nature, 29(3), s. 337–352.

Kruger, J., Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 77, s. 1121–1134.

Krueger, F., Grafman, J. (2012). I believe to my soul. W: F. Krueger, J. Grafman (red.), The neural basis of human belief systems (s. 225–236). Taylor & Francis.

Kuhnen, C. M., Knutson, B. (2011). The influence of affect on beliefs, preferences, and financial decisions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(3), s. 605–626.

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480.

Kurzban, R., Burton-Chellew, M. N., West, S. A. (2015). The evolution of altruism in humans. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), s. 575–599.

Laird, J. E., Lebiere, C., Rosenbloom, P. S. (2017). A standard model of the mind: Toward a common computational framework across artificial intelligence, cognitive science, neuroscience, and robotics. AI Magazine, 38(4), s. 13–26.

Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., Gignac, G. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing – Therefore (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, s. 622–633.

Lindeman, M., Lipsanen, J. (2016). Diverse cognitive profiles of religious believers and nonbelievers. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(3), s. 185–192.

Lovallo, D., Kahneman, D. (2003). Delusions of success. Harvard Business Review, 81, s. 56–63.

Mandelbaum, E. (2019). Troubles with Bayesianism: An introduction to the psychological immune system. Mind & Language, 34(2), s. 141–157.

Mandelbaum, E., Quilty-Dunn, J. (2015). Believing without reason or: Why liberals shouldn’t watch Fox News. The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 22, s. 42–52.

Mar, R. A. (2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, s. 103–134.

Marsh, E. J., Stanley, M. L. (2020). False beliefs: Byproducts of an adaptive knowledge base? W: R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffe, E. Newman, N. Schwarz (red.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting mis¬information (s. 131–146). Routledge.

McKay, R. T., Dennett, D. C. (2009). The evolution of misbelief. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(6), s. 493–495.

Mercier, H. (2016). Confirmation bias – Myside bias. W: R. Pohl (red.), Cognitive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in judgement (s. 109–124). Psychology Press.

Merkel, S., Chan, H. F., Schmidt, S. L., Torgler, B. (2020). Optimism and pos¬itivity biases in performance appraisal ratings. Empirical evidence from professional soccer. Applied Psychology, s. 1100–1127.

Metz, S. E., Weisberg, D. S., Weisberg, M. (2018). Non-scientific criteria for belief sustain counter-scientific beliefs. Cognitive Science, 42(5), s. 1477–1503.

Milfont, T. L., Milojev, P., Greaves, L. M., Sibley, C. G. (2015). Socio-structural and psychological foundations of climate change beliefs. New Zealand Jour¬nal of Psychology, 44(1), s. 18–30.

Molden, D. C., Higgins, E. T. (2012). Motivated thinking. W: K. J. Holyoak, R. G. Morrison (red.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (s. 390–409). Oxford University Press.

Montibeller, G., von Winterfeldt, D. (2015). Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 35(7), s. 1230–1251.

Morgulev, E., Azar, O. H., Lidor, R., Sabag, E., Bar-Eli, M. (2018). Searching for judgment biases among elite basketball referees. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2637.

Morris, D. (1981). The soccer tribe. Jonathan Cape.

Morrison, A. P., Wells, A., Nothard, S. (2000). Cognitive factors in predisposition to auditory and visual hallucinations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(1), s. 67–78.

Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A. D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., Fried, I. (2010). Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20, s. 750–756.

Newberg, A., Lee, B. (2005). The neuroscientific study of religious and spiritual phenomena: Or why God doesn’t use biostatistics. Zygon, 40(2), s. 469–490.

Newberg, A. B., D’Aquili, E., Rause, V. (2001). Why God won’t go away: Brain science and the biology of belief. Ballantine.

Newson, M., Buhrmester, M., Whitehouse, H. (2016). Explaining lifelong loyalty: The role of identity fusion and self-shaping group events. PLoS One, 11(8), e0160427.

Newson, M., Bortolini, T., Buhrmester, M., da Silva, S., Acquino, J., White¬house, H. (2018). Brazil’s football warriors: Social bonding and inter-group violence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(6), s. 675–683.

Newson, M., Shiramizu, V., Buhrmester, M., Hattori, W., Jong, J., Yamamoto, E., Whitehouse, H. (2020). Devoted fans release more cortisol when watching live soccer matches. Stress and Health, 36(2), s. 220–227.

Ng, K. Y., Koh, C., Ang, S., Kennedy, J. C., Chan, K. Y. (2011). Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings. Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, s. 1033–1044.

Norman, G. R., Monteiro, S. D., Sherbino, J., Ilgen, J. S., Schmidt, H. G., Mamede, S. (2017). The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: Cognitive biases, knowledge deficits, and dual process thinking. Academic Medicine, 92(1), s. 23–30.

Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), s. 101–117.

Oatley, K. (2012). The cognitive science of fiction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(4), s. 425–430.

Oberai, H., Anand, I. M. (2018). Unconscious bias: Thinking without thinking. Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(6), s. 14–17.

Palmer, C. L., Peterson, R. D. (2016). Halo effects and the attractiveness premium in perceptions of political expertise. American Politics Research, 44(2), s. 353–382.

Park, D. C., Huang, C.-M. (2010). Culture wires the brain: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, s. 391–400.

Pemberton, A., Aarten, P. G. M. (2017). Narrative in the study of victimological processes in terrorism and political violence: An initial exploration. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 41(7), s. 541–556.

Pennycook, G., Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), s. 388–402.

Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), s. 549–563.

Persinger, M. A. (2001). The neuropsychiatry of paranormal experiences. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 13(4), s. 515–524.

Pohl, R. F. (2017). Introduction: Cognitive illusions. W: R. F. Pohl (red.), Cogni¬tive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in judgement (s. 3–21). Psychology Press.

Porot, N., Mandelbaum, E. (2021). The science of belief: A progress report. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 12(2), e1539.

Rahman, T., Resnick, P. J., Harry, B. (2016). Anders Breivik: Extreme beliefs mistaken for psychosis. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 44(1), s. 28–35.

Raiola, G., Tafuri, D., Gomez Paloma, F. (2014). Physical activity and sport skills and its relation to mind theory on motor control. Sport Science, 7(1), s. 52–56.

Ramachandran, V. S., Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the brain: Probing the mysteries of the mind. Quill.

Rizeq, J., Flora, D. B., Toplak, M. E. (2021). An examination of the underlying dimensional structure of three domains of contaminated mindware: Paranormal beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, and anti-science attitudes. Thinking and Reasoning, 27(2), s. 187–211.

Roets, A. (2017). ‘Fake news’: Incorrect, but hard to correct. The role of cog¬nitive ability on the impact of false information on social impressions. Intelligence, 65, s. 107–110.

Rogers, L. J., Kaplan, G. T. (2002). Songs, roars, and rituals: Communication in birds, mammals, and other animals. Harvard University Press.

Saucier, G. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Person¬ality and Social Psychology, 78(2), s. 366–385.

Saucier, G. (2013). Isms dimensions: Toward a more comprehensive and integrative model of belief-system components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), s. 921–939.

Saver, J. L., Rabin, J. (1997). The neural substrates of religious experience. Journal of Neuropsychiatry Clinical Neuroscience, 9(3), s. 498–510.

Schmack, K., de Castro, A. G. C., Rothkirch, M., Sekutowicz, M., Rössler, H., Haynes, J. D., Sterzer, P. (2013). Delusions and the role of beliefs in perceptual inference. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(34), s. 13701–13712.

Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Current Biology, 21, s. R941–R945.

Pobrania

Dane do pobrania nie są jeszcze dostępne.