Metafora w działaniu

Abrams M. H., 1953, The Mirror and the Lamp, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Adams M. V., 2008, The archetypal school, [w:] P. Young-Eisendrath, T. Dawson (red.), Cambridge Companion to Jung (wydanie drugie), s. 107−125.
View in Google Scholar

Aldrich V. C., 1968, Visual metaphor, The Journal of Aesthetic Education”, vol. 2(1), s. 73−86.
View in Google Scholar

Althaus N., Westermann G., 2016, Labels constructively shape object categories in 10-month-old infants, „Journal of Experimental Child Psychology”, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.013 (dostęp 03.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Altshuller G., 2000, The Innovation Algorithm, Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA.
View in Google Scholar

Anderson R. D. Jr., 2001, Metaphors of dictatorship and democracy: Change in the Russian political lexicon and the transformation of Russian politics, „Slavic Review”, 60(2), s. 312−335.
View in Google Scholar

Angus L. E., 1996, An intensive analysis of metaphor themes in psychotherapy, [w:] J. S. Mio, A. N. Katz (red.), Metaphor: Implications and applications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, s. 73−84.
View in Google Scholar

Angus L. E., Korman Y., 2002, Conflict, coherence, and change in brief psychotherapy: A metaphor theme analysis, [w:] S. Fussell (red.), The verbal communication of emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, s. 151−165.
View in Google Scholar

Ansah G. N., 2010, The Cultural Basis of Conceptual Metaphors: The Case of Emotions in Akan and English, Lancaster University, [w:] Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching, Lancaster.
View in Google Scholar

Ardalan K., 2012, On the Role of Paradigm in Finance, Ashgate Publishing LTD.
View in Google Scholar

Arendt H., 1989, O myśleniu, (tłum. H. Buczyńska-Garewicz), Aletheia Wydawnictwo Europa, Londyn.
View in Google Scholar

Arlow J. A., 1979, Metaphor and the psychoanalytic situation, „Psychoanalytic Quarterly”, vol. 48, s. 363−385.
View in Google Scholar

Arnheim R., 1969, Visual thinking, Berkeley: University of California Press.
View in Google Scholar

Aronson E., Turner J. A, Carlsmith J. M., 1963, Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change, „The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology”, 67(1), s. 31−36, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0045513
View in Google Scholar

Arystoteles, 1988, Retoryka-Poetyka, PWN Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Atkinson J., 1964, An introduction to motivation, Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
View in Google Scholar

Atkinson R. C., Shiffrin R. M., 1968, Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes, [w:] K. W. Spence, J. T. Spence (red.), The psychology of learning and motivation, t. 2, New York: Academic Press, s. 89–195.
View in Google Scholar

Atran S., 2004, In Gods We Trust. The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Aubusson P. J., Harrison A. G., Ritchie S. M., 2006, Metaphor and analogy in science education, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
View in Google Scholar

Bagozzi R. P., Baumgartner H., Pieters R., Zeelenberg M., 2000, The role of emotions, [w:] S. Ratneshwar, D. G. Mick, C. Huffman (red.), The why of consumption: Contemporary perspectives on consumer motives, goals, and desires, New York, NY: Routledge, s. 36–58.
View in Google Scholar

Bailer-Jones D., 2001, Models, Metaphors, and Analogies, [w:] P. Machamer i M. Silberstein (red.), Guide to the Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
View in Google Scholar

Baker S. R., Partyka L., 2012, Metaphor in Radiology versus Other Medical Specialities, „RadioGraphics”, 32, s. 235−240.
View in Google Scholar

Balkin J. M., 2002, Cultural Software: A theory of Ideology, Yale University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Barker P., 1996, Psychotherapeutic metaphors: A guide to theory and practice, New York: Brunner/Mazel.
View in Google Scholar

Barlow J. M., Pollio H. R., Fine H. J., 1977, Insight and figurative language in psychotherapy, „Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice”, 14, s. 212−222 (za: McMullen).
View in Google Scholar

Barrett F., Cooperrider D. L., 1990, Generative Metaphor Intervention: A New Approach for Working with Systems Divided by Conflict and Caught in Defensive Perception, „The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science”, 26(2), s. 219−239 (także: R. Fry, F. Barrett, J. Seiling, D. Whitney (red.), 2002, Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Transformation: Reports from the Field, Quorum Books, s. 121−148).
View in Google Scholar

Beardsley M. C., 1962, The metaphorical twist, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research”, 22(3), s. 293−307.
View in Google Scholar

Beck A. T., 1967, Depression: Clinical, experimental and theoretical aspects, New York: Harper & Row.
View in Google Scholar

Bennett M. R., Hacker P. M., 2003, Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience, Blackwell Publishing (Rozdział 3).
View in Google Scholar

Bereiter X. C., 2002, Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
View in Google Scholar

Berlyne D. E., 1971, Aesthetics and Psychology, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts (za: Cupchik).
View in Google Scholar

Berlyne D. E., 1974, Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics, New York: Wiley.
View in Google Scholar

Black A., Ammon P., 1992, A developmental-constructivist approach to teacher education, „Journal of Teacher Education”, 43(5), s. 323−335.
View in Google Scholar

Black M., Metaphor, 1962a, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Models and Metaphors, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, s. 25–47.
View in Google Scholar

Black M., Models and Archetypes, 1962b, [w:] A. Ortony (red.) Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, s. 219−243.
View in Google Scholar

Black M., 1979, More about Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 19−41.
View in Google Scholar

Blasko D., Conniene C., 1993, Effects of Familiarity and Aptness on Metaphor Processing, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition”, 19, s. 295−308.
View in Google Scholar

Blumenberg H., 2010, Paradigms for a Metaphorology, Cornell University Press: Ithaca, New York, s. 5; (tłum. z niem. R. Savage), oryginał niemiecki: Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie, 1960, Suhrkamp Verlag Frankfurt am Main.
View in Google Scholar

Boden M. A. 2004, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, Routledge, London (wydanie drugie).
View in Google Scholar

Bono J. J., 1990, Science, discourse and literature: The role/rule of metaphor in science, [w:] S. Peterfreund (red.), Literature and Science: Theory and Practice, Boston: Northeastern University Press, s. 59−89.
View in Google Scholar

Borbely A. F., 2008, Metaphor and Psychotherapy, [w:] R. W. Gibbs Jr. (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 412−424.
View in Google Scholar

Bourdieu P., 1985, The Social Space and the Genesis of the Group, „Theory and Society”, 14(6), s. 723–744.
View in Google Scholar

Bowdle B., Gentner D., 2008, Metaphor as Structure-Mapping, [w:] R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 109−128.
View in Google Scholar

Bowers J. W., 1963, Language intensity, social introversion, and attitude change, „Speech Monographs”, 30, s. 345−352 (za: Sopory, Dillard 2002a).
View in Google Scholar

Bowers J. W., Osborn M. M., 1966, Attitudinal effects of selected types of concluding metaphors in persuasive speeches, „Speech Monographs”, 33, s. 147−155 (za: Sopory, Dillard 2002b).
View in Google Scholar

Bradbury T. N., Fincham F. D., 1988, The impact of attributions in marriage: An experimental analysis, „Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology”, 7, s. 147−162.
View in Google Scholar

Braddon-Mitchell D., Jackson D., 1996, The philosophy of mind and cognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Brandl M. S., Metaphor(m) and Foundational Metaphors in Vincent van Gogh, http://www.metaphorandart.com/articles/vangoghmet.html (dostęp 08.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Breugelmans S. M., Poortinga Y. H., Ambadar Z., Setiadi B., Vaca J. B., Widiyanto P., 2005, Body sensations associated with emotions in Rarámuri Indians, rural Javanese, and three student samples, „Emotion”, 5, s. 166–174.
View in Google Scholar

Brisard F., Frisson S., Sandra D., 2001, Processing Unfamiliar Metaphors in a Self-Paced Reading Task, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 16(1/2), s. 87−108.
View in Google Scholar

Bronk R., 2009, The Romantic Economist: Imagination in Economics, Cambridge University Press, New York (zob. także Richard Bronk, Cover Interview, May 22, 2009), http://rorotoko.com/interview/20090522_bronk_richard_romantic_economist_imagination_economics/?page=4 (dostęp 12.04.17).
View in Google Scholar

Brown D. E., Clement J., 1989, Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction, „Instructional Science”, 18(4), s. 237−261.
View in Google Scholar

Brown T. L., 2003, Making Truth: Metaphor in Science, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
View in Google Scholar

Broyard A., 1992, Intoxicated by his Illness and Other Writings on Life and Death, New York: Ballantine Books (za: Periyakoil).
View in Google Scholar

Bruner J. S., Goodnow J. J., Austin, G. A., 1956, A Study of Thinking, Wiley. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, London (6 wydanie).
View in Google Scholar

Buczyńska-Garewicz H., 1980, Słowo wstępne do M. Bense, Świat przez pryzmat znaku, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Burge E. J., 2004, Bridging action and reflection: Strategies and questions for teaching librarians, [w:] D. B. Thomas (red.), National LOEX Library Instruction Conference, Reflective teaching: A bridge to learning: selected papers presented at the thirty-first National LOEX Library Instruction Conference, held in Madison, Wisconsin, 8 to 10 May 2003 Ann Arbor, Michigan: Pierian Press, s. 9−18.
View in Google Scholar

Burke A., Heuer F, Reisberg D., 1992, Remembering Emotional Events, „Memory & Cognition”, 20(3), s. 277–290, http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1210&context=faculty_scholarship (dostęp 02.07.17).
View in Google Scholar

Burke K., 1945, A Grammar of Motives, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
View in Google Scholar

Burns G. W., 2001, 101 healing stories: Using metaphors in therapy, New York: Wiley.
View in Google Scholar

Bushe G. R., 2010, A comparative case study of appreciative inquiries in one organization: Implications for practice, „Review of Research and Social Intervention”, 29, s. 7−24 (za: Bushe, Storch).
View in Google Scholar

Bushe G. R., 2007, Appreciative inquiry is not (just) about the positive, „Organization Development Practicioner”, 39(4), s. 30−35 (podaje za Bushe, Storch, 2015).
View in Google Scholar

Bushe G. R., 2013a, Dialogic OD: A theory of practice, „Organization Development Practitioner”, 45(1), s. 11−17 (podaje za Bushe, Storch, 2015).
View in Google Scholar

Bushe G. R., 2013b, Generative process, generative outcome: The transformational potential of appreciative inquiry, [w:] D. L. Cooperrider, D. P. Zandee, L. N. Godwin, M. Avital, B. Boland (red.). Organizational Generativity: The Appreciative Inquiry Summit and a Scholarship of Transformation (Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, t. 4, s. 89–113.
View in Google Scholar

Bushe G. R., Storch J., 2015, Generative Image: Sourcing Novelty, [w:] G. R. Bushe, R. J. Marshak (red.), Dialogic Organization Development: The Theory and Practice of Transformational Change, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland, CA., s. 101−122.
View in Google Scholar

Cameron J. A., Alvarez J. M., Ruble D. N., Fuligni A. J., 2001, Children’s lay theories about ingroups and outgroups: Reconceptualizing research on prejudice, „Personality and Social Psychology Review”, 5, s. 118−128, http://humanvarieties.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Childrens-lay-theories-about-ingroups-and-outgroups-bias.pdf (dostęp 22.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Cameron L., 2003, Metaphor in educational discourse, London: Continuum.
View in Google Scholar

Camp E., 2006, Metaphor in the Mind; the Cognition of Metaphor, „Philosophy Compass”, 1/2, Blackwell Publishing, s. 154−170, http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~campe/Papers/Camp.MetinMind.pdf (dostęp12.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Camp E., 2007, Thinking with maps, „Philosophical Perspectives”, 21, s. 145–182.
View in Google Scholar

Campbell B., 1998, Realism versus Constructivism: Which is More Appropriate Theory for Addressing the Nature of Science in Science Education, „Electronic Journal of Science Education”, Southwestern University, 3(1), http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7597/536 (dostęp 14.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Carey J., 1989, Communication as Culture, Routledge, New York and London.
View in Google Scholar

Carey S., 1991, Knowledge Acquisition: Enrichment or Conceptual Change, [w:] S. Carey, R. Gelman (red.), The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
View in Google Scholar

Carroll N., 1996, A Note on Film Metaphor, [w:] N. Carroll, Theorizing the Moving Image, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 212−223.
View in Google Scholar

Carroll N., 1994, Visual metaphor, [w:] J. Hintikka (red.), Aspects of metaphor, Boston, MAL Kluver Academic Publications, s. 189−218.
View in Google Scholar

Castells M., 1996, The information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, t. 1: The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell, https://deterritorialinvestigations.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/manuel_castells_the_rise_of_the_network_societybookfi-org.pdf (dostęp 15.04.17).
View in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black J., 2005 [2011], Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, London, Palgrave Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black J., 2004, Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
View in Google Scholar

Chen K., 2012, Could your language affect your ability to save money?, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw3YTbubyjI (dostęp 12.10.17).
View in Google Scholar

Chiappe D., Kennedy J. M., Chiappe P., 2003, Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in predicting bias and preference for metaphors and similes, „Poetics”, 31, s. 51−68.
View in Google Scholar

Cirillo L., Crider C., 1995, Distinctive therapeutic uses of metaphor, „Psychotherapy”, 32, s. 511−519 (za: McMullen).
View in Google Scholar

Clark D., 2006, Longitudinal conceptual change in students’ understanding of thermal equilibrium. An examination of the process of conceptual restructuring, „Cognition and Instruction”, 24(4), s. 467−563.
View in Google Scholar

Clement C., Gentner D., 1991, Systematicity as a Selection Constraint in Analogical Mapping, „Cognitive Science”, 15, 89−132.
View in Google Scholar

Clow B., 2001, Who’s afraid of Susan Sontag? Or, the myths and metaphors of cancer reconsidered, „Social History of Medicine”, 14, s. 293−312.
View in Google Scholar

Coëgnarts M., Kravanja P., 2016, Bibliography on Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Cinema, http://www.academia.edu/19903404/Bibliography_on_Conceptual_Metaphor_Theory_and_Cinema (dostęp 02.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Cohen T., 1976, Notes on metaphor, „Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism”, 34, s. 249−259.
View in Google Scholar

Cooperrider D. L., Srivastva S., 1987, Appreciative inquiry in organizational life, [w:] R. W. Woodman, W. A. Pasmore (red.), Research in organizational change and development, t. 1. Stanford, CT: JAI Press, s. 129−169 (za: Bushe, Storch).
View in Google Scholar

Coulehan J., 2003, Metaphor and Medicine: Narrative in Clinical Practice, „Humanities and Medicine, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine”, 76, s. 87−95.
View in Google Scholar

Coulson S., Oakley T., 2006, Purple persuasion: Conceptual blending and deliberative rhetoric, [w:] J. Luchenbroers (red.), Cognitive Linguistcs: Investigations across languages, fields and philosophical boundaries, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, s. 47−65 (za: Sopory, Dillard 2002a).
View in Google Scholar

Coulter H. L. 1988, The Divided Legacy: A History of the Schism in Medical Thought, Wehawken Book Co. Washington, D.C. Berkeley, California, t. 2.
View in Google Scholar

Coulter R. A., 2001, Zaltman, G., Coulter, C.S. Interpreting consumer perceptions of advertising: an application of the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique, „Journal of Advertising”, 30(1) s. 1−21.
View in Google Scholar

Cupchik G. C., 2003, The ‘interanimation’ of worlds: Creative metaphors in art and design, „The Design Journal”, 6(2), s. 14−28, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233501503_The_’Interanimation’_of_Worlds_Creative_Metaphors_in_Art_and_Design (dostęp 14.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Cybulski J. L., Kelle, S., Saundage D., 2015, Interactive Exploration of Data with Visual Metaphors, „International Journal of Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering”, 25(2), s. 231−252.
View in Google Scholar

Danto A., 1993, Metaphor and cognition, [w:] F. R. Ankersmit, J. J. A. Mooij (red.), Metaphor and knowledge, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, s. 21–35.
View in Google Scholar

Davidson D., 1978, What Metaphors Mean, On Metaphor, Sacks, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s. 29−45.
View in Google Scholar

Davidson W. P., 1983, The Third-Person Effect in Communication, „Public Opinion Quarterly”, 47(1), s. 1−15.
View in Google Scholar

De Bono, E., New Think: The use of lateral thinking in the generation of new ideas, Basic Books, New York 1975.
View in Google Scholar

De GraziaS., 1962, Of Time, Work and Leisure, New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
View in Google Scholar

Dent-Read C., Szokolsky A., 1993, Where do metaphors come from?, „Metaphor and Symbolic Activity”, 8, s. 227–242.
View in Google Scholar

Detterman D. K., Ellis N. R., 1972, Determinants of Induced amnesia in short-term memory, „Journal of Experimental Psychology”, 95(2), s. 308−316.
View in Google Scholar

Dirven R., 1994, Metaphor and nation. Metaphors Afrikaners live by, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
View in Google Scholar

Draaisma D., 2016, Machina pamięci: Historia pamięci, (tłum. R. Pucek), Alethea, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Duit R., 1991, On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science, „Science Education”, 75(6), s. 649−672.
View in Google Scholar

Dunn J., 2015, Three Types of Metaphoric Utterances That Can Synthesize Theories of Metaphor, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 30(1), s. 1−23.
View in Google Scholar

Duschinsky R., 2012, Tabula Rasa and Human Nature, „Philosophy”, 87(04), s. 509−529, http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/10448/1/_PHI_PHI87_04_S0031819112000393a.pdf (dostęp 09.07.17).
View in Google Scholar

Eeasterbrook I. A., 1959, The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior, „Psychological Review”, 66, s. 183−201.
View in Google Scholar

Eerden B., 2009, 11. Anger in Asterix: The metaphorical representation of anger in comics and animated films. [w:] Forceville C. J., Urios-Aparisi E. (red.), „Multimodal Metaphor”, s. 243–264. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
View in Google Scholar

Efland A. D., 2002, Art and cognition: integrating the visual arts in the curriculum, New York: Teachers College Press (za: Serig).
View in Google Scholar

Ekman P. (red.), 1982, Emotion in the human face, Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge Press.
View in Google Scholar

Elkind D., 1989, Developmentally Appropriate Practice: Philosophical and Practical Implications, „Phi Delta Kappan”, 71(2), s. 113−117.
View in Google Scholar

Elman J., 1990, Finding Structure in Time, „Cognitive Science”, 14, 179–211.
View in Google Scholar

Engeström Y., 1999, Innovative Learning in Work Teams: Analyzing Cycles of Knowledge Creation in Practice, [w:] Y. Engeström R. Miettinen R. L. Punamäki (red.), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 377−404.
View in Google Scholar

Epstein S., 2003, Cognitive-Experiental Self-Theory of Personality, [w:] T. Millon, M. Lerner (red.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, t. 5: Personality and social psychology, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, s. 159−184.
View in Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard E. E., 1956, Neur Religion,Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 84–85, por. http://www.cpcjournal.org/doi/full/10.1597/09-046#sthash.5WXpYr8K.dpuf (dostęp 30.07.17).
View in Google Scholar

Fauconnier G., 1994, Mental spaces, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Fauconnier G., Turner M., 1998, Conceptual integration networks, „Cognitive Science”, 22(2), s. 133−187.
View in Google Scholar

Fez-Barringten B., (autor), E. Hart (red.), 2012, Architecture: The Making of Metaphor, Cambridge Scholar Publishing. Newcastle upon Tyne.
View in Google Scholar

Fincham F. D., Jaspers J. M., 1980, Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer, [w:] Berkowitz L. (red.), „Advances in experimental social psychology” New York: Academic Press, 13, s. 81–138.
View in Google Scholar

Fine H. J., Pollio H. R., Simpkinson C., 1973, Figurative language, metaphor and psychotherapy, Psychotherapy: „Theory, Research and Practice”, 10, s. 87–91 (za: McMullen).
View in Google Scholar

Fischer K., 2009, Mind, Brain, and Education: Building a Scientific Groundwork for Learning and Teaching, „International Mind, Brain, and Education Society and Wiley Periodicals”, 3(1), s. 3–16, https://www.gse.harvard.edu/~ddl/articlesCopy/Fischer-Groundwork.MBE2009.3.1.pdf (dostęp 02.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E., 1984, Social cognition, Addison-Wesley Pub.Co. (2 wydanie1991: New York: McGraw-Hill).
View in Google Scholar

Fodor J., 1990, A theory of content, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar

Fodor J., 1987, Psychosemantics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar

Fodor J., 1975, The language of thought, New York: Cromwell.
View in Google Scholar

Fodor J., 1981, Representations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar

Fontanier P., 1968, Les Figures du discours, Gerard Genette, Paris.
View in Google Scholar

Forceville C., 2000, Compasses, beauty queens, and other PCs: Pictorial metaphors in computer advertisements, „Journal of Linguistics”, 24, s. 31–55.
View in Google Scholar

Forceville C., 2008a, Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations, [w:] R. W. Gibbs Jr. (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 462−482.
View in Google Scholar

Forceville C., 2007, Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV-commercials, „The Public Journal of Semiotics”, 1(1), s. 15−34.
View in Google Scholar

Forceville C., 2008b, Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials, [w:] E. F. McQuarrie, B. J. Phillips, (red.), Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric, Armonk NY: ME Sharp, s. 272−310.
View in Google Scholar

Forceville C., 1996, Pictorial metaphor in advertising, London, UK: Routledge.
View in Google Scholar

Forceville C., 1994, Pictorial metaphors in advertisements, „Metaphor and Symbolic Activity”, 9(1), s. 1–29.
View in Google Scholar

Forceville C., Urios-Aparisi E., 2009, Multimodal Metaphor, Walter de Gruyer.
View in Google Scholar

Forrest D. V., 1973, On one’s own onymy, „Psychiatry”, 36, s. 266−290 (za: McMullen).
View in Google Scholar

Frank S. A., 2012, Wright’s Adaptive Language versus Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem, [w:] E. Svensson, R. Calsbeek (red.), The Adaptive Landscape in Evolutionary Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, s. 41−58, https://books.google.pl/books?id=MVWe9lkJnjoC&printsec=frontcover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (dostęp 26.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Frederick S., Fischhoff B., 1998, Scope (In)sensitivity in Elicited Valuations, „Risk, Decision, and Policy”, 3(2), s. 109−123.
View in Google Scholar

French M., 1996, Conceptual Design, Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
View in Google Scholar

Furnham A., 1988, Lay Theories: Everyday Understandings of Problems in the Social Sciences, New York: Pergamon.
View in Google Scholar

Gaensbauer T. J., Hiatt S., 1984, Facial Communication of Emotion in Early Infancy, [w:] N. A. Fox, R. J. Davidson (red.), The Psychobiology of Affective Development, Psychology Press, s. 207−230.
View in Google Scholar

Gardner H., 1985, The Mind’s New Science, Basic Books, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., 1982, Are scientific analogies metaphors?, [w:] D. Miall (red.), Metaphors: Problems and perspectives. Brighton, UK: Harvester, s. 106−132 (podaje za Sopory, Dillard 2002).
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., Bowdle B., Wolff P., Borobat C., 2001, Metaphor is like analogy, [w:] D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, B. K. Kokinov (red.), Perspectives from cognitive science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, s. 199−254.
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., Clement C., 1988, Evidence for relational selectivity in the interpretation of analogy and metaphor, [w:] G. H. Bower (red.), „The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory”, New York: Academic Press, 22, s. 307−358.
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., Markman A. B., 1994, Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity, „Psychological Science”, 5, s. 152−158.
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., Markman A. B., 1997, Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity, „American Psychologist”, 5, s. 45−56.
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., Rattermann M. J., 1991, Language and the career of similarity, [w:] S. A. Gelman, J. P. Brynes (red.), Perspectives on Language and Thought: Interrelations in Development, Cambridge University Press, s. 225−277.
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., 1983, Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy, Cognitive Science”, 7, s. 155−170.
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., 1989, The mechanisms of analogical transfer, [w:] S. Vosniadou, A. Ortony (red.), Similarity and analogical reasoning, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, s. 199−242.
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., 1988, Viewing Metaphor as Analogy, [w:] D. H. Helman (red.), Analogical Reasoning, Dordrecht.
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., Wolff P., 1997, Alignment in the Processing of Metaphor, „Journal of Memory and Language”, 37, s. 331−355.
View in Google Scholar

Gentner D., Rattermann M. J., 1998, Deep thinking in children: The case for knowledge change in analogical development. „Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, 21(6), s. 837−838
View in Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 2008, The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Gibbs R., Bogdonovich J., 1999, Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 14, s. 37−44.
View in Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1994, The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Gick M. L., Holyoak K. J., 1980, Analogical problem solving, „Cognitive Psychology”, 12, s. 306−355, http://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/gentner/papers/KurtzMiaoGentner01.pdf (dostęp 13.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Gilbert D. T., 1989, Thinking Lightly About Others: Automatic Components of the Social Inference Process, [w:] J. S. Uleman, J. A. Bargh (red.), Unintended thought, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, s. 189−211.
View in Google Scholar

Gilbert J. D., 2002, Inferential Correction, [w:] T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (red.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive thought, New York: Cambridge University Press, s. 167−184.
View in Google Scholar

Giora R., 2002, Literal vs. Figurative Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Gkiouzepas L., Hogg M. K., 2011, Articulating a New Framework for Visual Metaphors in Advertising, „Journal of Advertising”, 40 (1), s. 103−120.
View in Google Scholar

Głażewski M., Teoria systemów autopojetycznych Niklasa Luhmanna: między metafizyką a metabiologią, cejsh.icm.edu.pl/.../Michal_Glazewski_Teoria_systemow_autopojetyczny... (dostęp 25.08.17).
View in Google Scholar

Głażewski M., 2010, Dystopia: pedagogiczne konteksty teorii systemów autopojetycznych Niklasa Luhmanna, Zielona Góra: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego.
View in Google Scholar

Gleik J., 1999, Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything, New York: Pantheon Books.
View in Google Scholar

Glöckner A., Betsch T., 2008, Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition”, 34, s. 1055−1075.
View in Google Scholar

Glucksberg S., Keysar B., 1990, Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity, „Psychological Review”, 97, s. 3−18.
View in Google Scholar

Glucksberg S., McGlone M. S., Manfredi D. A., 1997, Property Attribution in metaphor comprehension, „Journal of Memory and Language”, 36, s. 50−67.
View in Google Scholar

Glynn S. M., 1989, The teaching with analogies model, [w:] K. D. Muth (red.), Children’s comprehension of text: Research into practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, s. 185−204.
View in Google Scholar

Glynn S. M., 2008, Making science concepts meaningful to students: teaching with analogies, [w:] S. Mikelskis-Seifert, U. Ringelband, & M. Brückmann (red.), Four decades of research in science education: From curriculum development to quality improvement, Münster, Germany: Waxmann, s. 113−125.
View in Google Scholar

Goatly A., 1997, The Language of Metaphor, London. Routledge.
View in Google Scholar

Goatly A., 2007, Washing Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins, s. 21−22.
View in Google Scholar

Godin G., Sheeran P., Conner M., Germain M., 2008, Asking questions changes behavior: mere measurement effects on frequency of blood donation, „Health Psychology”, 27(2), s. 179−84.
View in Google Scholar

Goldblum N. Margalit A., 1994, Metaphors in an open-class test, [w:] J. Hintikka (red.), Aspects of Metaphor, Dordrecht: Kluwer, s. 219−241.
View in Google Scholar

Goodenough W., 1957, Cultural anthropology and linguistics: Report of the 7th Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Study, P. Gavin, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University, s. 167−173.
View in Google Scholar

Goodman N., 1976, Languages of Art: An Approach to A theory of Symbols, (2 wydanie) Indianopolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
View in Google Scholar

Gordon W. J. J., 1961, Synectics: The development of creative capacity, Harper & Row, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Goschler J., 2007, Metaphors in Cognitive and Neurosciences: Which impact have metaphors on scientific theories and models?, Darmstadt, „metaphorik.de” 12, http://www.metaphorik.de/sites/www.metaphorik.de/files/journal-pdf/12_2007_goschler.pdf (dostęp 30.11.17).
View in Google Scholar

Gottfried G. M., 1997, Using metaphors as modifiers: Children’s production of metaphoric compounds, „Journal of Child Language”, 24(3), s. 567−601.
View in Google Scholar

Gould P., White R., 1974, Mental Maps, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
View in Google Scholar

Graham S., Weiner B., 2013, Theories and Principles of Motivation, [w:] D. C. Berliner, R. C. Calfee (red.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, Routledge, s. 63−85.
View in Google Scholar

Gravengaard G., 2011, The Metaphors Journalists Live by: Journalists’ Conceptualisation of Newswork, „Journalism”, 13(8), s. 1064−1082.
View in Google Scholar

Greene R., Elffers J., 2010, The 48 Laws of Power, Profile Books, London.
View in Google Scholar

Gregorowicz J., 1995, Zarys logiki dla prawników, Grand Gamma, Łódź.
View in Google Scholar

Grice H. P., 1980, Logic and conversation, [w:] P. Cole, J. L. Morgan (red.), Syntax and semantics, V/3, New York: Academic Press 1975, s. 41–58; (Logika i konwersacja, „Przegląd Humanistyczny” 1977, 6, s. 85–99 oraz w B. Stanosz (red.) Język w świetle nauki. Czytelnik, Warszawa, s. 91−114), http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf (dostęp 28.07.17).
View in Google Scholar

Guthrie M., 1972, Effects of credibility, metaphor, and intensity of comprehension, credibility, and attitude change, nieopublikowana praca (za: Sopory i Dillard 2002b).
View in Google Scholar

Hacco E., Shu L. H., 2002, Biomimetic Concept Generation Applied to Design for Remanufacture, Proceedings of the DETC 2002, ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computer and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Quebec. Canada.
View in Google Scholar

Hadley C. B., MacKay D. G., 2006, Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition”, 32, s. 79−88.
View in Google Scholar

Haglund J., 2013, Collaborative and self-generated analogies in science education, „Studies in Science Education”, 49(1), s. 35–68, http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:621708/FULLTEXT01.pdf (dostęp 13.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Haley J., 1999, Niezwykła terapia: techniki terapeutyczne Miltona H. Ericksona, (tłum. M. Majchrzak, M. Przylipiak z: Uncommon therapy [1973]), Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
View in Google Scholar

Hardcastle V. G., 1998, The puzzle of attention, the importance of metaphors, „Philosophical Psychology”, 11(3), s. 331−351.
View in Google Scholar

Harrison A., Treagust D., 2006, Teaching and learning with analogies – friend or foe, [w:] P. Aubusson, A. Harrison, D. Ritchie (red.), Metaphor and analogy in science education, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, s. 11−24.
View in Google Scholar

Hausman C. R., 1989, Metaphor and art, New York: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Hawking S. W., 2016, Ilustrowana krótka historia czasu, Zysk i S-ka.
View in Google Scholar

Hesse M. B., 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame, Ind. University of Notre Dame Press.
View in Google Scholar

Hey J., Linsey J., Agogino A., Wood K., 2008, Analogies and Metaphors in Creative Design, „International Journal of Engineering Education”, 24(2), s. 283−294, http://www.ijee.ie/articles/HMUDD/Vol24-2/s11_ijee2031.pdf (dostęp 16.07.17).
View in Google Scholar

Higgins E. T., 1996, Knowledge Activation: Accessibility, Applicability, and Salience, [w:] E. T. Higgins, A. Kruglansky (red.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, New York: Guilford Press, s. 133−168.
View in Google Scholar

Hill T., Lewicki P., Czyżewska M., Boss A., 1989, Self-perpetuating developments of encoding biases in person perception, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 57, s. 373−387.
View in Google Scholar

Hitchon J. C., 1991, To be or what to be: Metaphorical predication in advertising, (praca doktorska, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52 (04A), s. 14−38 (za: Sopory i Dillard 2002b).
View in Google Scholar

Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., Minkov M., 2010, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill USA.
View in Google Scholar

Hogarth R. M., Karelaia N., 2007, Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments, „Psychological Review”, 114, s. 733−758.
View in Google Scholar

Hogarth R. M., Karelaia N., 2005, Ignoring information in binary choice with continuous variables: When is less “more”?, „Journal of Mathematical Psychology”, 49, s. 115−124.
View in Google Scholar

Hong Y., Levy S. R., Chiu C., 2001, The Contribution of the Lay Theories Approach to the Study of Groups, „Personality and Social Psychology Review”, 5(2), s. 98−106.
View in Google Scholar

Hull C. L., 1952, A behavior system: An introduction to a behavior theory concerning the individual organism, New Haven: Yale University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Huxley A., 1962, Words and Their Meanings, [w:] Max Black (red.), The Importance of Language, Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.Y., (cytat s. 1).
View in Google Scholar

Incao P. F., 2012, The Paradigm Shift in Medicine and Science, Talk presented at the National Vaccine Information Conference, 2002/2003 http://philipincao.crestone-colorado.com/index_htm_files/The%20Paradigm%20Shift%20in%20Medicine%20and%20Science.pdf (dostęp 02.05.17).
View in Google Scholar

Indurkhya B., Kattalay K., Ojha A., Tand P., 2008, Experiments with a Creativity – Support System based on Perceptual Similarity, [w:] H. Fujita, I. Zualkernan (red.) New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, IOS Press: Amsterdam, s. 316−327, https://researchweb.iiit.ac.in/~amitashojha/somet.pdf (dostęp 03.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Indurkhya B., Ogawa S., 2012, An Empirical Study on the Mechanisms of Creativity in Visual Arts, [w:] Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conf. of the Cog. Sci. Society: CogSci, Sapporo, Japan.
View in Google Scholar

Indurkhya B., Ojha A., 2013, An Empirical Study on the Role of Perceptual Similarity in Visual Metaphors and Creativity, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 28, s. 233−253.
View in Google Scholar

Indurkhya B., Stojanov G., Creativity and Cognitive Development: The Role of Perceptual Similarity and Analogy, [w:] Creativity and (Early) Cognitive Development: Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium, https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS13/paper/viewFile/5792/5929 (dostęp 03.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Indurkhya B., 1994, Thinking Like A Child: The Role of Surface Similarities in Stimulating Creativity, Creativity and (Early) Cognitive Development: Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium Ingram J. L., The role of figurative language in psychotherapy: A methodological examination, „Metaphor and Symbolic Activity”, 9, s. 271−288 (za: McMullen).
View in Google Scholar

Ivie R. L., 1996, Tragic Fear and the Rhetorical Presidency: Combating Evil in the Persian Gulf, [w:] M. J. Medhurst (red.), Beyond the Rhetorical Presidency, College Station: Texas A&M University Press, s. 153−178.
View in Google Scholar

Jackendoff R., 1996, Conceptual Semantics and Cognitive Linguistics, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 7(1), s. 93−129.
View in Google Scholar

Johnson M., 1987, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
View in Google Scholar

Jowett G. S., O’Donnell V., 2006, Propaganda & Persuasion, Sage Publications. Califorrnia, London, New Dehli.
View in Google Scholar

Jung C. G., 1981, Archetypy i symbole: Pisma wybrane, Czytelnik Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Kahneman D., 2003, Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics, „The American Economic Review”, 93(5), s. 1449−1475, https://www.princeton.edu/~kahneman/docs/Publications/Maps_bounded_rationality_DK_2003.pdf (dostęp 22.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Kahneman D., Tversky A., 1981, The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice, „Science”, 211(30), s. 453−458, http://psych.hanover.edu/classes/cognition/papers/tversky81.pdf (dostęp 22.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Kaplan J., 2008, The end of the adaptive landscape metaphor?, „Biology & Philosophy”, 23, s. 625−638.
View in Google Scholar

Kaplan S. J., 1992, A Conceptual Analysis of Form and Content in Visual Metaphors, „Communication”, 13, s. 197−209.
View in Google Scholar

Kaplan S. J., 1990, Visual Metaphors in the Representation of Communication Technology, „Critical Studies in Mass Communication”, 7, s. 37−47.
View in Google Scholar

Katz A. N., Clark J., Marschark M., Paivio A., 1988, Norms for 204 Literary and 260 Nonliterary Metaphors on 10 Psychological Dimensions, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3(4), s. 191–214.
View in Google Scholar

Katz A. N., 1989, On choosing the vehicles of metaphors: Referential concreteness, semantic distances, and individual differences, „Journal of Memory and Language”, 28(4), s. 486–499.
View in Google Scholar

Kennedy J. M., 1993, Drawing and the blind, Pictures to touch, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Kennedy J. M., 2008, Metaphor and Art, [w:] R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (red.), Metaphor and Thought: The State of the Art, Cambridge University Press, s. 447−461.
View in Google Scholar

Kennedy J. M., 1982, Metaphor in pictures, „Perception”, 11, s. 589–605.
View in Google Scholar

Keysar B., Shen Y., Glucksberg S., Horton W. S., 2000, Conventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It?, „Journal of Memory and Language”, 43, s. 576−593.
View in Google Scholar

King P., 2012, Metaphor and Methodology for Cross cultural Investigation of Hebrew Emotions, „Journal of Translation”, 8(1), s. 9−25.
View in Google Scholar

Kirstein L., 1971, Movement and Metaphor: Four centuries of ballet, Pitman.
View in Google Scholar

Kittay E., 1987, Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure, Oxford: Clarendon Press (za: Borbely).
View in Google Scholar

Klamer A., Leonard T. C., 1994, So what’s an economic metaphor?, [w:] P. Mirowski (red.), Natural Images in Economic Thought: Markets Read in Tooth and Claw, Cambridge University Press, s. 20−52, https://www.princeton.edu/~tleonard/papers/metaphor.pdf (dostęp 06.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Koestler A., 1964, The Act of Creation, London: Hutchinson & Co. (przedruk: Penguin Books: Arcana, 1989).
View in Google Scholar

Koller V., 2004, Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar

Kopp R. R., 1995, Metaphor therapy: Usingclient-generated metaphors in psychotherapy, New York: Brunner/Mazel (za: McMullen).
View in Google Scholar

Kövecses Z., 2000a, American English. An introduction. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.
View in Google Scholar

Kövecses Z., 1995, Anger: Its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural evidence, [w:] J. R. Taylor, R. E. MacLaury (red.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 79−92.
View in Google Scholar

Kövecses Z., 2005, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation, New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Kovecses Z., 2002, Metaphor: a Practical Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
View in Google Scholar

Kövecses Z., 2008, Universality and Variation in the Use of Metaphor, [w:] N. L. Johannesson, D. C. Minugh (red.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals, Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University, s. 51–74, http://remat.amu.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Kovecses_Universality-and-Variation-in-the-Use-of-Metaphor.pdf (dostęp 21.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Kövesces Z., 2006, Language, Mind and Culture. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Kövesces Z., 2000b, Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture and Body in Human Feeling, Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Kuhn T. S., 2011, Struktura rewolucji naukowych, Aletheia, Warszawa; The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
View in Google Scholar

Kurtz K. J., Miao C. H. Gentner D., 2001, Learning by Analogical Bootstrapping, „The Journal of the Learning Science”, 10(4), s. 417−446, http://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/gentner/papers/KurtzMiaoGentner01.pdf (dostęp 10.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 1987, Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Espenson J., Schwartz A., 1991, Master metaphor list, second draft copy. Manuscript [rękopis] .
View in Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1988, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, University of Chicago Press 1980; Metafory w naszym życiu, (tłum. T. Krzeszowski). Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
View in Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Turner M., 1989, More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to poetic Metaphor, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
View in Google Scholar

Larsen V., Luna D., Peracchio L. A., 2004, Points of View and Pieces of Time: A Taxonomy of Image Attributes, „Journal of Consumer Research”, 31(1), s. 102−111.
View in Google Scholar

Lenrow P. B., 1966, Use of metaphor infacilitating constructive behavior change, „Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice”, 3, s. 145−148 (za: McMullen).
View in Google Scholar

Levin S. R., 1977, The Semantics of Metaphor, John Hopkins University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Levitt H., Korman Y., Angus L., 2000, A metaphor analysis in treatments of depression: Metaphor as a marker of change, „Counselling Psychology Quarterly”, 13, s. 23−35 (za: McMullen).
View in Google Scholar

Lewin K., 1935, A dynamic Theory of personality, McGraw-Hill New York.
View in Google Scholar

Lewin K., 1936, Principles of topological psychology, McGraw-Hill New York.
View in Google Scholar

Lewis D., 1994, Reduction of Mind, [w:] S. Guttenplan (red.), A companion to the philosophy of mind, Oxford: Blackwell, s. 412−431.
View in Google Scholar

Libet B., http://www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/libet_experiments.html
View in Google Scholar

Liu C. H., Kennedy J. M., 1996, Form and its symbolic meaning, [w:] R. Woodfield (red.), Gombrich on Art. And Psychology, Manchester: Manchester UP, s. 127−140.
View in Google Scholar

Locke J., 1955 [1690] Rozważania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego, Księga III, Rozdz. 10. PWN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Loewenstein J., Thompson L., Gentner D., 1999, Analogical encoding and relational language in long term transfer of negotiation, „Psychosomatic Bulletin & Review”, 6, s. 586−597 (za: Kurtz).
View in Google Scholar

Lorenz K., 2002 [1966] On aggression, Psychology Press, Routledge, London, New York (z niem. Das sogenannte Böse zur Naturgeschichte der Aggression, 1963)
View in Google Scholar

Lotman J., 2005, On the Semiosphere, „Труды по знаковым системам” 1984, 17, s. 5–23, (tłum. na j. angielski W. Clark), „Sign Systems Studies”, 33(1), s. 327−336.
View in Google Scholar

Low G., 2008, Metaphor and education, [w:] R.W. Jr. Gibbs (red.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 212−231.
View in Google Scholar

Lubich C., 2000, Il grido, Roma: Citta Nuova.
View in Google Scholar

Lutz C. A., 1988, Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to western theory, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
View in Google Scholar

Lyddon W. J., Clay A. L., Sparks C. L., 2001, Metaphor and change in counseling, „Journal of Counseling and Development”, 79, s. 269−274 (za: McMullen).
View in Google Scholar

Maalej Z. A., 2004, Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 19(1), s. 51−75.
View in Google Scholar

Maalej Z. A., 2001, Processing Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, „Academic Research” 1 (Tunisia, Sfax), s. 19−42.
View in Google Scholar

Maassen S., Weingart P., 1995, Metaphors – Messengers of Meaning: A Contribution to an Evolutionary Sociology of Science, „Science Communication”, 17(1), s. 9−31.
View in Google Scholar

MacCormac E., 1985, A cognitive theory of metaphor, Cambrodge, MA: Mit Press.
View in Google Scholar

Maes A., Schilperoord J., 2008. Classifying Visual Rhetoric: Conceptual and Structural Heuristics, [w:] E. F. McQuarrie, B. J. Phillips (red.), Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, s. 227−253.
View in Google Scholar

Mammadov A., 2010, Metaphors in the American and Russian political discourse, Rask Journal, 31, s. 67−87, http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles/C/8/1/%7BC81F7500-F598-45CD-86E0-F44DF4D1FC5A%7Dazad%20mammadov.pdf (dostęp 18.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Marquez G. G., 2014, Miłość w czasach zarazy, Muza S.A., Warszawskie Wydawnictwo Literackie.
View in Google Scholar

Marshall A., 1997 [1890], Principles of Economics, Prometheus Books.
View in Google Scholar

Massey D. B., 1984, Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production, New York: Methuen.
View in Google Scholar

Matsuki K., 1995, Metaphors of anger in Japanese, Berlin: Mouton.
View in Google Scholar

Maturana H. R., Varela F. J., 1980, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, t. 42, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Springer Science & Business Media Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing.
View in Google Scholar

McAdams D., Wood K., 2002, A Quantitative Similarity Metric for Design by Analogy, „ASME Journal of Mechanical Design”, 124(2), s. 173−182.
View in Google Scholar

McClosky D. N., 1985, The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.
View in Google Scholar

McGaugh J. L., 2004, Memory reconsolidation hypothesis revived but restrained: Theoretical comment on Biedenkapp and Rudy (2004), „Behavioral Neuroscience”, 118, s. 1140−1142.
View in Google Scholar

McGregor S., Purver M., Wiggins G., 2015, Metaphor, Meaning, Computers and Consciousness, https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/events/2015/AISB2015/proceedings/philosophy/mcgregor.pdf (dostęp 21.04.17).
View in Google Scholar

McMullen L. M., 2008, Putting it in Context, [w:] R. W. Jr Gibbs (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 397−411.
View in Google Scholar

McQuarrie E. F., Mick D. G., 1999, Visual rhetoric in advertising: text interpretative, experimental, and reader-response analyses, „Journal of Consumer Research”, 26(1), s. 37−54.
View in Google Scholar

McQuarrie E. F., Phillips B., 2005, Indirect Persuasion in Advertising: How Consumers Process Metaphors Presented in Pictures and Words, „Journal of Advertising”, 34(2), s. 7−21.
View in Google Scholar

Mechling J., 1990, Theory and the other; or, Is this session the text?, „American Behavioral Scientist”, 34(2), s. 153−164.
View in Google Scholar

Medin D., Ross B. H., Markman A. B., 2001, Cognitive Psychology, Hartcourt College Publishers.
View in Google Scholar

Messaris P., 1997, Visual persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
View in Google Scholar

Miller G. A., 1993, Images and Models, Similes and Metaphors, [w:] Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 202−254.
View in Google Scholar

Miller G. A., 1956, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information, „Psychological Review”, 63(2), s. 81−97.
View in Google Scholar

Mills J., Aronson E., 1965, Opinion change as a function of the communicator’s attractiveness and desire to influence, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 1, s. 173−177.
View in Google Scholar

Mirowski P., 1989, More Heat Than Light: Economics as Social-Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Mitchell A. A., Olson J. C., 1981, Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?, „Journal of Advertising”, 28(4), s. 1−12.
View in Google Scholar

Moraczewski K., 2010, O metaforze w mediach niejęzykowych, „Estetyka i Krytyka”, 24(1), s. 77−89, http://estetykaikrytyka.pl/art/24/eik_24_6.pdf (dostęp 23.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Morgan G., 2015, Images of Organization, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc. 1986; Obrazy organizacji, (tłum. Z. Wiankowska-Ładyka), Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
View in Google Scholar

Morgan G., 1980, Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory, „Administrative Science Quaterly”, 25(4), s. 605–622.
View in Google Scholar

Morgan S. E., Reichert T., 1999, The message in the metaphor: assessing the comprehension of metaphors in advertisments, „Journal of Advertising”, 28(4), s. 1−12.
View in Google Scholar

Murdock B. B. Jr., 1974, Human memory: Theory and data, Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
View in Google Scholar

Nagel E., 1970, The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World 1961; Struktura nauki, zagadnienia logiki wyjaśnień naukowych, (tłum. J. Giedymin, B. Rassalski, H. Eilstein), PWN.
View in Google Scholar

Namy L. L., Gentner D., 2002, Making a Silk Purse Out of Two Sow’s Ears: Young Children’s Use of Comparison in Category Learning, „Journal of Experimental Psychology”, 131(1), s. 5−15.
View in Google Scholar

Neisser U., 1976, Cognition and Reality. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
View in Google Scholar

Neisser U., 1967, Cognitive Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
View in Google Scholar

Nelson M. R., Hitchon J. C., 1999, Loud tastes, colored fragrances, and scented sounds: How and when to mix the senses in persuasive communications, „Journalism & Mass Communication Quaterly”, 76(2), s. 354−372.
View in Google Scholar

Nelson M. R., Hitchon J. C., 1995, Theory of synesthesia applied to persuasion in print advertising Headlines, „Journalism & Mass Communication Quaterly”, 72(2) s. 346−360.
View in Google Scholar

Newberg A., D’Aquili E., Rause V., 2001, Why God Won’t Go Away. Brain Science & the Biology of Belief, New York: Ballantine Books.
View in Google Scholar

Newell R. B., Broder A., 2008, Cognitive processes, models and metaphors in decision research, „Judgement and Decision Making”, 3(3), s. 195−204.
View in Google Scholar

Niebert K., Gropengießer H., 2011, ‘CO2 causes a hole in the atmosphere.’ Using laypeople’s conceptions as a starting point to communicate climate change, [w:] W. Leal (red.), The economic, social and political elements of climate change, Berlin: Springer, s. 603−622.
View in Google Scholar

Niebert K., Marsch S., Treagust D. F., 2012, Understanding Needs Embodiment: A Theory-Guided Reanalysis of the Role of Metaphors and Analogies in Understanding Science, „Science Education” Wiley Periodicals, Inc., 96(5), s. 849−877.
View in Google Scholar

Nonaka I., Nishiguchi T., (red.), 2001, Knowledge emergence: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation, New York: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Nonaka I., Takeuchi H., 1995, The knowledge creating company, New York: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Oakes L. M., Coppage D. J., Dingel, A., 1997, By land or by sea: The role of perceptual similarity in infants’ categorization of animals, „Developmental Psychology”, 33, s. 396−407.
View in Google Scholar

Ortony A., 1979, Beyond Literal Similarity. „Psychological Review”, 86, s. 160−180.
View in Google Scholar

Ortony A., 1980, Metaphor: A Multidimensional Problem, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 1−19.
View in Google Scholar

Osborne J. F., 1996, Beyond constructivism, „Science Education”, 80 (1), s. 53−82.
View in Google Scholar

Ottati V., Rhoads S., Graesser A. C., 1999, The effect of metaphor on processing style in a Persuasion task: Amotivational Resonance Model, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 77, s. 688−697, https://www.surrey.ac.uk/politics/research/researchareasofstaff/isppsummeracademy/instructors%20/The%20effect%20of%20Metaphor.pdf (dostęp 21.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Paavola S., Hakkarainen K., 2009, From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts – A trialogical approach to CSCL, [w:] C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann i A. Dimitracopoulou (red.), „Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices: CSCL2009 ConferenceProceeding”, s. 83−89, http://www.helsinki.fi/science/networkedlearning/texts/paavola-hakkarainen-2009-trialogical-cscl.pdf (dostęp 14.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Pawełczyk P., 2000, Socjotechniczne aspekty gry politycznej, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar

Pearce S. S., 1996, Flash of insight: Metaphor and narrative in therapy, Needham Heights: MA: Allyn and Bacon.
View in Google Scholar

Peirce C. S., 1997, Wybór pism semiotycznych, (tłum. R. Mirek, A. Nowak), Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Pelc J., 1964, Zastosowanie funkcji semantycznych do analizy pojęcia metafory, [w:] Rozprawy logiczne. Księga Pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Kazimierza Ajdukiewicza, Warszawa, PWN, s. 123−153.
View in Google Scholar

Pepper S., 1942, World Hypotheses, Berkeley: University of California Press (za: Klamer, Leaonard).
View in Google Scholar

Periyakoil V. S., 2008, Using Metaphors in Medicine, „Journal of Palliative Medicine”, 11(6), s. 842−844.
View in Google Scholar

Petrie H. G., 1993, Metaphor and learning, [w:] A. Ortony (red.) Metaphor and thought, s. 438−461.
View in Google Scholar

Philips B., McQuarrie E. F., 2004, Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising, „Making Theory”, 4(1/2), s. 113–136, DOI:10.1177/1470593104044089, https://courses.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/course-material/4482592/22.3_MT2004Phillips.pdf (dostęp 05.07.17).
View in Google Scholar

Philips B., McQuarrie E. F., 2002, The development, change, and transformation of rhetorical style in magazine advertisements 1954−1999, „Journal of Advertising”, 31(4), s. 1−13.
View in Google Scholar

Phillips B., 2000, The Impact of Verbal Anchoring on Consumer Response to Image Ads, „Journal of Advertising”, 29(1), s. 15−24.
View in Google Scholar

Piaget J., 1973, To Understand is to invent: The Future of Education, Grossman Publishers, Viking Press, New York, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0000/000061/006133eo.pdf (dostęp 21.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Pierce K. A., Gholson B., 1994, Surface similarity and relational similarity in the development of analogical problem solving: isomorphic and nonisomorphic transfer, „Developmental Psychology”, 30(5), s. 724−737.
View in Google Scholar

Pinker S., 1984, Language Learnability & Language Development, Harvard University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Pinker S., 2000, The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language, New York: Perennial Classics.
View in Google Scholar

Platon, 1986, Timajos Kritias, PWN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Pragglejaz Group, 2007, MIP (Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse), „Metaphor and Symbol”, 22(1), s. 2−39.
View in Google Scholar

Proctor T., Proctor S., Papasolomou I., 2005, Visualizing the metaphor, „Journal of Marketing Communication”, 11(1), s. 55−72, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1352726042000284455?src=recsys&journalCode=rjmc20 (dostęp 20.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Przerwa-Tetmajer K., 1974, Poezje, PIW Warszawa, s. 39.
View in Google Scholar

Quinn N., 1991, The Cultural Basis of Metaphor, [w:] J. Fernandez (red.), Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology, Stanford, C.A.: Stanford University Press, s. 56−93.
View in Google Scholar

Rattermann M. J., Gentner D., 1998, The effect of language on similarity: The use of relational labels improves young children’s performance in a mapping task, [w:] K. Holyoak, D. Gentner, B. Kokinov (red.), Advances in analogy research: Integration of theory & data from the cognitive, computational, and neural sciences, Sophia: New Bulgarian University, s. 274−282.
View in Google Scholar

Read S. J., Cesa I. L., Jones D. K., Collins N. L., 1990, When is the federal budget like a baby? Metaphor in political rhetoric, „Metaphor and Symbolic Activity”, 5, s. 125−149 (za: Sopory Dillard 2002b).
View in Google Scholar

Recanati F., 1995, The alleges priority of literal interpretation, „Cognitive Science”, 19, s. 207−232.
View in Google Scholar

Reddy J. M., 1979, The Conduit Metaphor – A case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 284−310.
View in Google Scholar

Reimer M., Camp E., 2006, Metaphor, [w:] E. Lepore, B. Snith (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Langauge, New York: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Reiner M., Slotta J., Chi M., Resnick L., 2000, Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based Conception, „Cognition and Instruction”, 18(1), s. 1−34.
View in Google Scholar

Reinsch N. L. Jr., 1974, Figurative language and source credibility: A preliminary investigation and reconceptualization, „Human Communication Research”, 1, s. 75−80 (za: Sopory, Dillard 2002b).
View in Google Scholar

Rescorla M., 2009, Cognitive maps and the language of thought, „British Journal for the Philosophy of Science”, 60, s. 377−407.
View in Google Scholar

Richards I. A., 1936, The Philosophy of Rhetoric, Oxford University Press, London, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Ricouer P., 1978, The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language, London Routledge.
View in Google Scholar

Ritchie L. D., 2013, Metaphor: Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Ritchie S. M., 1994, Metaphor as a tool for constructivist science teaching, „International Journal of Science Education”, 16(3), s. 293−303.
View in Google Scholar

Roeckelein J. E., 2006, Elsevier’s Dictionary of Psychological Theories, Elsevier, s. 623.
View in Google Scholar

Rotter J., 1966, Generalized expentancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, „Psychological Monographs”, 80, s. 1−20.
View in Google Scholar

Rotter J., 1954, Social learning and clinical psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
View in Google Scholar

Rozik E., 1998, Ellipsis and the surface structures of verbal and nonverbal metaphor, „Semiotica”, 119(1/2), s. 77−103.
View in Google Scholar

Rozik E., 1994, Pictorial metaphors, „Kodikas/codes”, 17, s. 203–218.
View in Google Scholar

Rumelhart D., McClelland J., 1988, Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs, and exercises, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
View in Google Scholar

Russell J. A., 1991, Culture and the categorization of emotions, „Psychological Bulletin”, 110, s. 426−450.
View in Google Scholar

Russell J. A., 1994, Is There Universal Recognition of Emotion From Facial Expression? A Review of Cross-Cultural Studies, „Psychological Bulletin”, 115(1), s. 102−141.
View in Google Scholar

Rutherford J., McGuffin P., Katz R. J., Murray R. M., 1993, Genetic influences on eating attitudes in a normal female twin population, „Psychological Medicine”, 23, s. 425−436.
View in Google Scholar

Rutter M., 2005, Genes and Behaviour, Oxford: Blackwell.
View in Google Scholar

Rybarkiewicz D., 1997, Three Aspects of Metaphor, „Logica Trianguli”, 1, s. 93−103.
View in Google Scholar

Rybarkiewicz D., 1998, The Structure of Metaphor: Towards a Pragmatic Approach, „Logica Trianguli”, 2, s. 103−115.
View in Google Scholar

Ryle G., 1970 [1949], Czym jest umysł, (tłum. W. Marciszewski), PWN.
View in Google Scholar

Samuelson P. A., 1970, Maximum Principles in Analytical Economics, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Nobel Memorial Lecture, http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1970/samuelson-lecture.pdf (dostęp 02.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Scacco J., 2009, Shaping Economic Reality: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of President Barack Obama’s Economic Language During His First 100 Days, „Gnovis: Georgetown University Journal of Communication, Culture & Technology”, http://www.gnovisjournal.org/2009/12/22/shaping-economic-reality-critical-metaphor-analysis-president-barack-obama-s-economic-langua/ (dostęp 12.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Schein E. H., 2017, Organizational Culture and Leadership, John Wiley & Sons Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey.
View in Google Scholar

Schilperoord J., Maes A., Ferdinandusse H., 2009, Perceptual and conceptual visual rhetoric. The case of symmetric object alignment, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 24, 155–173.
View in Google Scholar

Schmidt S. R., 2012, Extraordinary Memories for Exceptional Events, Psychology Press: Taylor & Francis Group, New York, London.
View in Google Scholar

Schmitt R., 2005, Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research, „The Qualitative Report”, 10(2), s. 358−394.
View in Google Scholar

Schön D. A., 1993 [1979], Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought (wyd. drugie) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Mass, s. 137−163.
View in Google Scholar

Schrödinger E., 1948, What is Life?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 72, http://whatislife.stanford.edu/LoCo_files/What-is-Life.pdf (dostęp 05.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Schumpeter J. A., 2008, The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, (tłum. z niemieckiego [1911] na angielski Redvers Opie), New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.): Transaction Publisher.
View in Google Scholar

Schwitzgebel E., 2015, Belief, [w:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/ (dostęp 14.12.17).
View in Google Scholar

Scott L. M., 1994, Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric, „Journal of Consumer Research”, 21(2), s. 252–273.
View in Google Scholar

Searle J. R., 1980, Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 92−124.
View in Google Scholar

Seifert J., 1997, What is Life? The Originality, Irreducibility, and Value of Life, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
View in Google Scholar

Semino E., Heywood J., Short M., 2004, Methodological problems in the analysis of metaphors in a corpus of conversations about cancer, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 36, s. 1271−1294.
View in Google Scholar

Sfard A., 1998, On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Danger of Choosing Just One, „Educational Researcher”, 27, s. 4−13.
View in Google Scholar

Shewmon D. A., Shewmon E. S., 2004, Semiotics of Death and its Medical Implications, [w:] C. Machado, D. A. Shewmon (red.), Brain Death and Disorders of Consciousness, Springer Science & Business Media, s. 89 –114.
View in Google Scholar

Shewmon D. A., 2001, The brain and somatic integration: insights into the standard biological rationale for equating „brain death” with death, „Journal of Medicine and Philosophy”, 26(5), s. 457−478.
View in Google Scholar

Shinohara K., Matsunaka Y., 2009, Pictorial metaphors of emotion in Japanese comics, [w:] C. Forceville, E. Urios-Aparisi, s. 265−293.
View in Google Scholar

Siegelman E. Y., 1990, Metaphor and meaning in psychotherapy, New York: Guilford.
View in Google Scholar

Siltanen S. A., 1990, Effects of Explicitness on Children’s Metaphor Comprehension, „Metaphor and Symbolic Activityl”, 5(1), s. 1−20.
View in Google Scholar

Siltanen S. A., 1981, The persuasiveness of metaphor: A replication and extension, „Southern Speech Communication Journal”, 47, s. 67−83 (za: Sopory, Dillard 2002b).
View in Google Scholar

Simon H. A., 1990, Invariants of human behavior, „Annual Review of Psychology”, 41, s. 1−19.
View in Google Scholar

Smith M. R., 2007, Levels of Metaphor in Persuasive Legal Writing, „Mercer Law Review”, Vol. 58, s. 919−948.
View in Google Scholar

Sontag S., 1989, AIDS and Metaphor, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York (wydanie polskie: Chorba Jako metafora. AIDS I jego metafory, (tłum. J. Anders), Karakter, Kraków 2016).
View in Google Scholar

Sontag S., 1978, Illness and Metaphor, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York (wydanie polskie: Chorba Jako metafora. AIDS I jego metafory, (tłum. J. Anders), Karakter, Kraków 2016).
View in Google Scholar

Sopory P., Dillard J. P., 2002a, Figurative Language and Persuasion, [w:] J. P. Dillard, M. Pfau (red.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice, Thousand Oaks, Ca, SAGE, s. 407−426.
View in Google Scholar

Sopory P., Dillard J. P., 2002b, The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis, „Human Communication Research”, 28(3), s. 382−419.
View in Google Scholar

Sopory P., 1999, Metaphor and Persuasion, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison (za: Sopory, Dillard 2002b).
View in Google Scholar

Spencer A., 2012, The Social Construction of Terrorism: Media, Metaphor, and Policy Implications, „Journal of International Relations and Development”, 15(3), s. 393−419, http://www.gsi.uni-muenchen.de/personen/wiss_mitarbeiter/spencer/publ_spencer/jird_spencer_post_print.pdf (dostęp 21.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Sperber D., Wilson D., 1995, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, (wyd. 2)., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Spitzer M., 2003, Metaphor and Musical Thought, University of Chicago Press.
View in Google Scholar

Srivastva S., Barrett F. J., 1988, The transforming nature of metaphors in group development: A study in group theory, „Human Relations”, 41, s. 31−64 (za: Bushe, Storch)
View in Google Scholar

Stein Z., 2015, Minding Your Metaphors About the Mind, „Independent School”, 75(1), s. 26−32.
View in Google Scholar

Stewart J. Q., Warntz W., 1958, Physics of Population Distribution, „Journal of Regional Science”, 1, s. 99−123.
View in Google Scholar

Su L. I., 2002, What Can Metaphors Tell Us About Culture?, „Language and Linguistics”, 3(3), s. 589−613.
View in Google Scholar

Sulmasy D. P., 1993, What so Special About Medicine?, „Theoretical Medicine”, 14, s. 27−42, https://pmr.uchicago.edu/sites/pmr.uchicago.edu/files/uploads/Sulmasy,%20What’s%20so%20special%20about%20medicine,%20Theor%20Med,%201993.pdf (dostęp 23.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Sut A., 2015, Paradygmat poznawczy etologicznej Szkoły Lorenza-Tinbergena, „Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe”, 36/2, s. 61−71, http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-b2f97751-3b35-4b49-8f63-ad805ea50ed2 (dostęp 12.12.17)
View in Google Scholar

Tan S. C., So H. J., Yeo J., 2014, Knowledge Creation in Education, Springer, Singapore New York.
View in Google Scholar

Tarzia F., 2013, Metaphor in the Collective Imaginary, [w:] F. Ervas, E. Gola, Metaphor in Focus: Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor Use, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, s. 9−21.
View in Google Scholar

Taylor J., Mbense T., 1998, Red dogs and rotten mealies: How Zulus talk about anger, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
View in Google Scholar

Tendahl M., 2009, A hybrid theory of metaphor: Relevance theory and cognitive linguistics, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar

Thagard P., 1999, How scientist explain disease, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, http://campus.uni-muenster.de/uploads/media/06_15-06_RefKo_A_Explain_Diseases_Thagard.pdf (dostęp 06.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Tinbergen N., 1976, Badania nad instynktem, (tłum. G. Bujalska-Grüm, L. Grüm), Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa (The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press,1951).
View in Google Scholar

Tinbergen N., 1963, On aims and methods of ethology, „Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie”, 20, s. 410−433, http://www.esf.edu/efb/faculty/documents/tinbergen1963onethology.pdf (dostęp 23.07.17).
View in Google Scholar

Tolman E. C., 1925, Purpose and cognition: The determiners of animal learning, „Psychological Review”, 32, s. 285−297.
View in Google Scholar

Truog R. D., 1997, Is it time to abandon brain death?, „Hastings Center Report”, 27(1), s. 29−37 (za: Shewmon et al.).
View in Google Scholar

Tsfati Y., Meyers O., Peri Y., 2006, What is a Good Journalism? Comparing Israeli Public and Journalists’ Perspectives, „Journalism”, 7(2), s. 152−173.
View in Google Scholar

Tuggy D., 1993, Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 4, s. 273– 290 (za: Borbely).
View in Google Scholar

Tversky A., 1977, Features of Similarity, „Psychological Review”, 84, s. 327−52.
View in Google Scholar

Ungerer F., Schmid H. J., 1996, An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics, Longman, London, s. 1−160.
View in Google Scholar

Valentine T., Ferrara A., 1991, Typicality in categorization, recognition and identification: Evidence from face recognition, „British Journal of Psychology”, 82, s. 87–102.
View in Google Scholar

Van Dijk T. A., 2006, Discourse and Manipulation, „Discourse and Society”, 17, s. 359−383, http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Discourse%20and%20manipulation.pdf (dostęp 15.06.17).
View in Google Scholar

Van Gogh V., 1970, Listy do brata, Czytelnik Warszawa, s. 141.
View in Google Scholar

Van Weelden L., Maes A., Schilperoord J., Cozijn, R., 2011, The role of shape in comparing objects: How perceptual similarity may affect visual metaphor processing, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 26, s. 272–298.
View in Google Scholar

Veatch R. M., 2006, How Philosophy of Medicine Has Changes Medical Ethics, „Journal of Medicine and Philosophy”, 31(6), s. 585−600, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03605310601009315 (dostęp 13.07.17).
View in Google Scholar

Von Krogh G., Ishijo K., Nonaka I., 2000, Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Vosniadou S., 1987, Children and Metaphors, „Child Development”, 58(3), s. 870−885.
View in Google Scholar

Vosniaudou S., Brewer W. F., 1992, Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood, „Cognitive Psychology”, 24, s. 535−585.
View in Google Scholar

Vroom V. H., 1964, Work and motivation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
View in Google Scholar

Vygotsky L. S., 1978, Interaction between learning and development, [w:] M. Gauvain, M. Cole (red.), Readings on the Development of Children, New York Scientific American Books, s. 34-40.
View in Google Scholar

Walsh M., 1990, Text, ‘Text’, and Swift’s A Tale of a Tub, „Modern Language Review”, 85, s. 290−303.
View in Google Scholar

Warnick B. R., 2004, Technological Metaphors and Moral Education. The Hacker Ethic and the Computational Experience, „Studies in Philosophy and Education”, 23, s. 265−281.
View in Google Scholar

Weaver D. H., 1998, The Global Journalist. News People around the World, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
View in Google Scholar

Weiner B., 1991, Metaphor in Motivation and Attribution, „American Psychologist”, 46(9), s. 921−930.
View in Google Scholar

Weinreich U., 1966, Explorations in Semantic Theory, [w:] T. A. Sebeok (red.), Current Trends in Linguistics: Theoretical Foundations, The Hague: Mouton Press, t. 3, s. 395–477.
View in Google Scholar

Whaley B. B., 1991, Toward a comprehensive model of analogy in persuasion: A test of the persuasive roles of analogy, „Dissertation Abstracts International”, 53 (01A): 20 (za: Sopory, Dillard 2002b).
View in Google Scholar

Wheelwright P., 1968, Metaphor and Reality, Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Whittock T., 1990, Metaphor and Film, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Whittock T., 1992, The Role of Metaphor in Dance, „British Journal of Aesthetics”, 32(3), s. 242−249.
View in Google Scholar

Wilbers J., Duit R., 2001, On the micro-structure of analogical reasoning: The case of understanding chaotic systems, [w:] H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit,W. Graber, M. Komorek, A. Kross, P. Reiska (red.), Research in science education–past, present, and future, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, s. 205−210.
View in Google Scholar

Wilbers J., Duit R., 2006, Post-festum and heuristic analogies, [w:] P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, S. M. Ritchie (red.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, s. 37−49.
View in Google Scholar

Wills J., Lee R., 2014, Geographies of Economies, Routledge, London, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Wilson T. D., 2002, Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconsciousness, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Wormeli R., 2009, Metaphors and Analogies: Power Tools for Teaching Any Subject, Stenhouse Publishers.
View in Google Scholar

Wright K. J. T., 1976, Metaphor and symptom: A study of integration and its failure, „International Review of Psychoanalysis”, 3, s. 97−109 (za: McMullen).
View in Google Scholar

Wright S., 1964, Stochastic processes in evolution, [w:] J. Gurland (red.), Stochastic Models in Medicine and Biology, t. 25, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison WI, s. 199−241 (za: Frank).
View in Google Scholar

Wright S., 1988, Surfaces of selective value revisited, „The American Naturalist”, 131, s. 115−123 (za: Kaplan).
View in Google Scholar

Wright S., 1932, The roles of mutation, imbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution, [w:] The sixth international congress of genetics, t. 1, s. 356−366 (za: Kaplan).
View in Google Scholar

Wyatt S., 2004, Danger! Metaphors at work in Economics, Geophysiology, and the Internet, „Science, Technologies, & Human Values”, 29(2), s. 242−261, http://www.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/internationalexeter/documents/iss/Wyatt_danger-metaphors_(3).pdf (dostęp 13.11.17).
View in Google Scholar

Yu N., 1995, Metaphorical expression of anger and happiness in English and Chinese, „Metaphor and Symbolic Activity”, 10, s. 223−245.
View in Google Scholar

Yus F., 2009, Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account, [w:] C. Forceville, E. Urios-Aparisi (red.), Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 147−172.
View in Google Scholar

Zanini P., 1997, Significati del confine. I limiti naturali, storici, mentali, Milano: Bruno Mondadori (za Tarzia, 2013).
View in Google Scholar

Zeki S., 2011, Blaski i cienie pracy mózgu: O miłości, sztuce i pogoni za szczęściem, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, (tłum. Anna i Marek Binder: Splendors and Miseries of the Brain. Love, Creativity and the Quest for Human Happiness, Wiley-Blackwell, MA-Oxford, 2009).
View in Google Scholar