Wprowadzamy dane do ScienceON
Zgodnie z Komunikatem Prorektora UŁ ds. nauki dotyczącym systemu ScienceON od 15.09.2023 r. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego wprowadza dane o wszystkich publikacjach wydanych przez siebie...
Teoria sprawiedliwości Johna Rawlsa, podobnie jak i jego filozofia polityki, nie są łatwe do intelektualnego przyswojenia. Mimo że był filozofem amerykańskim i ewidentnie bliska była mu anglosaska tradycja analityczna w filozofii, która odznacza się dążeniem do jasności stylu i ogólnej klarowności intelektualnej, to jednak czytelnik jego Teorii sprawiedliwości i w nieco mniejszej mierze innych prac z pewnością nie ma łatwego zadania. Śledzenie meandrów myśli Rawlsa jest bowiem trudne i wymaga wielkiej koncentracji. W tym sensie wprowadzenie do jego teorii sprawiedliwości i filozofii polityki to rzecz z pewnością bardzo potrzebna, więc projekt Krzysztofa Kędziory należy przywitać z radością. Jego wykonanie także budzi szacunek i uznanie.
Z recenzji prof. Andrzeja Szahaja
A Companion to Rawls, J. Mandle, D. A. Reidy (red.), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester 2014.
View in Google Scholar
Ackerman B., Political Liberalisms, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1994, t. 97, nr 7, s. 364– 386, https://doi.org/10.2307/2940935.
View in Google Scholar
Ackerman B., Social Justice in the Liberal State, Yale University Press, New Haven 1980.
View in Google Scholar
Anderson E. S., What is the Point of Equality?, „Ethics” 1999, t. 109, nr 2, s. 287–337, https://doi.org/10.1086/233897.
View in Google Scholar
Andryszczak P., Droga do sprawiedliwego społeczeństwa w ujęciu Johna Rawlsa i Alasdaira MacIntyre’a: analiza krytyczna, Scriptum, Kraków 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Anti-Theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism, S. G. Clarke, E. Simpson (red.), State University of New York Press, Albany NY 1989.
View in Google Scholar
Arneson R. J., From Primary Goods to Capabilities to Well-being, „Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy” 2013, t. 16, nr 2, s. 179–195, https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.757910.
View in Google Scholar
Arneson R. J., Primary Goods Reconsidered, „Noûs” 1990, t. 24, nr 3, s. 429–454, https://doi.org/10.2307/2215774.
View in Google Scholar
Arrow K. J., Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls’s Theory of Justice, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1973, t. 70, nr 9, s. 245–263, https://doi.org/10.2307/2025006.
View in Google Scholar
Audard C., John Rawls, Acumen, Stocksfield 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Bagnoli C., Constructivism in Metaethics, [w:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), E. N. Zalta (red.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/constructivism-metaethics/ (dostęp: 4.02.2019).
View in Google Scholar
Baier K., Justice and the Aims of Political Philosophy, „Ethics” 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 771–790, https://doi.org/10.1086/293121.
View in Google Scholar
Bankovsky M., Perfecting Justice in Rawls, Habermas and Honneth. A Deconstructive Perspective, Bloomsbury Academic, London 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Barry B., John Rawls and the Priority of Liberty, „Philosophy Public Affairs” 1973, t. 2, nr 3, s. 274–290.
View in Google Scholar
Barry B., John Rawls and the Search for Stability, „Ethics” 1995, t. 105, nr 4, s. 874–915, https://doi.org/10.1086/293756.
View in Google Scholar
Barry B., Justice as Impartiality, Oxford University Press, New York 1995.
View in Google Scholar
Barry B., The Liberal Theory of Justice. Critical Examination of the Principal Doctrines in A Theory of Justice by John Rawls, Oxford University Press, New York 1973.
View in Google Scholar
Barry Ch., Redistribution, [w:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), E. N. Zalta (red.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/redistribution/ (dostęp: 4.02.2019).
View in Google Scholar
Bates S., The Motivation to be Just, „Ethics” 1974, t. 85, nr 1, s. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1086/291935.
View in Google Scholar
Baynes K., Constructivism and Practical Reason in Rawls, „Analyse & Kritik” 1992, t. 14, nr 1, s. 18–32, https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1992-0102.
View in Google Scholar
Beatty J., The Rationality of the „Original Position”: A Defense, „Ethics” 1983, t. 93, nr 3, s. 484–495, https://doi.org/10.1086/292461.
View in Google Scholar
Beitz Ch. R., Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1979.
View in Google Scholar
Benhabib S., The Methodological Illusions of Modern Political Theory. The Case of Rawls and Habermas, „Neue Hefte Fuer Philosophie” 1982, t. 21, s. 47–74.
View in Google Scholar
Besch T. M., Constructing Practical Reason: O’Neill on the Grounds of Kantian Constructivism, „The Journal of Value Inquiry” 2008, t. 42, nr 1, s. 55–76, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-008-9097-9.
View in Google Scholar
Bohman J., Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism: Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflict, „Political Theory” 1995, t. 23, nr 2, s. 253–279, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591795023002004.
View in Google Scholar
Brandt R. B., The Science of Man and Wide Reflective Equilibrium, „Ethics” 1990, t. 100, nr 2, s. 259–278, https://doi.org/10.1086/293176.
View in Google Scholar
Brighouse H., Political Equality in Justice as Fairness, „Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition” 1997, t. 86, nr 2, s. 155–184, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017942221913.
View in Google Scholar
Brink D. O., Rawlsian Constructivism in Moral Theory, „Canadian Journal of Philosophy” 1987, t. 17, nr 1, s. 71–90.
View in Google Scholar
Brower B. W., The Limits of Public Reason, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1994, t. 91, nr 1, s. 5–26, https://doi.org/10.2307/2940948.
View in Google Scholar
Brudney D., Hypothetical Consent and Moral Force, „Law and Philosophy” 1991, t. 10, nr 3, s. 235–270, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00149798.
View in Google Scholar
Brun G., Reflective Equilibrium Without Intuitions?, „Ethical Theory and Moral Practice” 2014, t. 17, nr 2, s. 237–252, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9432-5.
View in Google Scholar
Buchanan A., Distributive Justice and Legitimate Expectations, „Philosophical Studies” 1975, t. 28, nr 6, s. 419–425, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00372903.
View in Google Scholar
Buchanan J. M., A Hobbesian Interpretation of the Rawlsian Difference Principle, „Kyklos” 1976, t. 29, nr 1, s. 5–25, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1976.tb01958.x.
View in Google Scholar
Carter A., The Evolution of Rawls’s Justification of Political Compliance: Part 1 of The Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls’s Theories of Justice, „Journal of Moral Philosophy” 2006, t. 3, nr 1, s. 7–21, https://doi.org/10.1177/1740468106063280.
View in Google Scholar
Carter A., The Evolution of Rawls’s Justification of Political Compliance: Part 2 of The Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls’s Theories of Justice, „Journal of Moral Philosophy” 2006, t. 3, nr 2, s. 135–157, https://doi.org/10.1177/1740468106065489.
View in Google Scholar
Charney E., Political Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and the Public Sphere, „American Political Science Review” 1998, t. 92, nr 1, s. 97–110, https://doi.org/10.2307/2585931.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen G. A., On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen G. A., Rescuing Justice and Equality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2008.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen G. A., Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen J., A More Democratic Liberalism, „Michigan Law Review” 1994, t. 92, nr 6, s. 1503–1546, https://doi.org/10.2307/1289593.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen J., Democratic Equality, „Ethics” 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 727–751, https://doi.org/10.1086/293119.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen J., Pluralism and Proceduralism, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 589–618.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen J., Taking People as They Are?, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 2001, t. 30, nr 4, s. 363–386, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00363.x.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen J., The Economic Basis of Deliberative Democracy, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 1989, t. 6, nr 2, s. 25–50, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265052500000625.
View in Google Scholar
Crocker L., Equality, Solidarity, and Rawls’ Maximin, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1977, t. 6, nr 3, s. 262–266.
View in Google Scholar
Daniels N., Equality of What: Welfare, Resources, or Capabilities?, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 1990, t. 50, suplement, s. 273–296, https://doi.org/10.2307/2108044.
View in Google Scholar
Daniels N., Justice and Justification. Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
View in Google Scholar
Daniels N., Moral Theory and the Plasticity of Persons, „The Monist” 1979, t. 62, nr 3, s. 265–287, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197962318.
View in Google Scholar
Darwall S. L., Two Kinds of Respect, „Ethics” 1977, t. 88, nr 1, s. 36–49, https://doi.org/10.1086/292054.
View in Google Scholar
De Marneffe P., Liberalism, Liberty, and Neutrality, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1990, t. 19, nr 3, s. 253–274.
View in Google Scholar
De Marneffe P., Rawls’s Idea of Public Reason, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1994, t. 75, nr 3–4, s. 232–250, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00129.x.
View in Google Scholar
Deigh J., Shame and Self-Esteem: A Critique, „Ethics” 1983, t. 93, nr 2, s. 225–245, https://doi.org/10.1086/292431.
View in Google Scholar
Delaney C. F., Rawls on Method, „Canadian Journal of Philosophy” 1977, t. 7, nr 3, 153– 161, https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1977.10717045.
View in Google Scholar
DeLue S. M., Aristotle, Kant and Rawls on Moral Motivation in a Just Society, „American Political Science Review” 1980, t. 74, nr 2, s. 385–393, https://doi.org/10.2307/1960634.
View in Google Scholar
DeMarco J. P., Richmond S. A., A Note on the Priority of Liberty, „Ethics” 1977, t. 87, nr 3, s. 272–275, https://doi.org/10.1086/292041.
View in Google Scholar
Depaul M. R., Balance and Refinement. Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry, Routledge, London 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Development and Main Outlines in Rawls’s Theory of Justice, tom 1; The Two Principles and Their Justifications, tom 2; Opponents and Implications of A Theory of Justice, tom 3; Moral Psychology and Community, tom 4.
View in Google Scholar
Diggs B. J., A Contractarian View of Respect for Persons, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 1981, t. 18, nr 4, s. 273–283.
View in Google Scholar
Dombrowski D. A., Rawls and Religion. The Case for Political Liberalism, SUNY Press, New York 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Dworkin R., Biorąc prawa poważnie, tłum. T. Kowalski, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1998.
View in Google Scholar
Eberle Ch. J., Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.
View in Google Scholar
Edmundson W. A., John Rawls. Reticent Socialist, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017.
View in Google Scholar
Eggleston B., Accounting for the Data Intuitions in Moral Theory Selection, „Ethical Theory and Moral Practice” 2014, t. 17, nr 4, s. 761–774, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9478-4.
View in Google Scholar
Elgin C. Z., Considered Judgment, Princeton University Press, Princenton 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Elster J., Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992.
View in Google Scholar
Eng S., Why Reflective Equilibrium? II: Following Up on Rawls’s Comparison of His Own Approach with a Kantian Approach, „Ratio Juris” 2014, t. 27, nr 2, s. 288–310, https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12039.
View in Google Scholar
Eng S., Why Reflective Equilibrium? III: Reflective Equilibrium as a Heuristic Tool, „Ratio Juris” 2014, t. 27, nr 3, s. 440–459, https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12052.
View in Google Scholar
Equality and Liberty. Analyzing Rawls and Nozick, J. A. Corlett (red.), Palgrave Macmillan, London 1991.
View in Google Scholar
Esheté A., Contractarianism and the Scope of Justice, „Ethics” 1974, t. 85, nr 1, s. 38–49, https://doi.org/10.1086/291937.
View in Google Scholar
Estlund D., Liberalism, Equality, and Fraternity in Cohen’s Critique of Rawls, „Journal of Political Philosophy” 1998, t. 6, nr 1, s. 99–112, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00048.
View in Google Scholar
Estlund D., The Insularity of the Reasonable: Why Political Liberalism Must Admit the Truth, „Ethics” 1998, t. 108, nr 2, s. 252–275, https://doi.org/10.1086/233804.
View in Google Scholar
Fallon R. H., A Constructivist Coherence Theory of Constitutional Interpretation, „Harvard Law Review” 1987, t. 100, nr 6, s. 1189–1286, https://doi.org/10.2307/1341158.
View in Google Scholar
Fishkin J., Justice and Rationality: Some Objections to the Central Argument in Rawls’s Theory, „American Political Science Review” 1975, t. 69, nr 2, s. 615–629, https://doi.org/10.2307/1959092.
View in Google Scholar
Forst R., Contexts of Justice. Political Philosophy beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism, tłum. J. M. M. Farell, University of California Press, Berkeley 2002.
View in Google Scholar
Forst R., Justification and Critique. Towards a Critical Theory of Politics, tłum. C. Cronin, Polity Press, Cambridge 2014.
View in Google Scholar
Forst R., Political Liberalism: A Kantian View, „Ethics” 2017, t. 128, nr 1, s. 123–144, https://doi.org/10.1086/692945.
View in Google Scholar
Forst R., The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice, tłum. J. Flynn, Columbia University Press, New York 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Fotion N., Theory vs. Anti-Theory in Ethics. A Misconceived Conflict, Oxford University Press, New York 2014.
View in Google Scholar
Franklin R. M., In Pursuit of a Just Society: Martin Luther King, Jr., and John Rawls, „Journal of Religious Ethics” 1990, t. 18, nr 2.
View in Google Scholar
Freeman S., Contractualism, Moral Motivation, and Practical Reason, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1991, t. 88, nr 6, s. 281–303, https://doi.org/10.2307/2026686.
View in Google Scholar
Freeman S., Justice and the Social Contract. Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy, Oxford University Press, New York 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Freeman S., Original Meaning, Democratic Interpretation, and the Constitution, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1992, t. 21, nr 1, s. 3–42.
View in Google Scholar
Freeman S., Political Liberalism and the Possibilty of a Just Democratic Constitution, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 619–668.
View in Google Scholar
Freeman S., Rawls, Routledge, London 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Freeman S., Reason and Agreement in Social Contract Views, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1990, t. 19, nr 2, s. 122–157.
View in Google Scholar
Freeman S., The Burdens of Public Justification: Constructivism, Contractualism, and publicity, „Politics, Philosophy & Economics” 2007, t. 6, nr 1, s. 5–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594x07073003.
View in Google Scholar
Galston W. A., Cele liberalizmu, tłum. A. Pawelec, Znak, Kraków 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Galston W. A., Moral Personality and Liberal Theory, „Political Theory” 1982, t. 10, nr 4, s. 492–519, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591782010004002.
View in Google Scholar
Galston W. A., Pluralism and Social Unity, „Ethics” 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 711–726, https://doi.org/10.1086/293118.
View in Google Scholar
Gauthier D., Morals by Agreement, Oxford University Press, New York 1986.
View in Google Scholar
Gauthier D., The Social Contract as Ideology, „Philosophy & Public Aff s” 1977, t. 6, nr 2, s. 130–164.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbard A., Disparate Goods and Rawls’ Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment, „Theory and Decision” 1979, t. 11, nr 3, s. 267–288, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00126381.
View in Google Scholar
Greenawalt K., From the Bottom Up. Selected Essays, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.
View in Google Scholar
Greenawalt K., On Public Reason, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 669–689.
View in Google Scholar
Griffin S. M., Political Philosophy versus Political Theory: The Case of Rawls, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 691–707.
View in Google Scholar
Gustafsson J. E., The Difference Principle Would Not Be Chosen behind the Veil of Ignorance, „The Journal of Philosophy” 2018, t. 115, nr 11, https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20181151134.
View in Google Scholar
Guyer P., Principles of Justice, Primary Goodsand Categories of Right: Rawlsand Kant, „Kantian Review” 2018, t. 23, nr 4, s. 581–613, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415418000419.
View in Google Scholar
Habermas and Rawls. Disputing the Political, J. G. Finlayson, F. Freyenhagen (red.), Routledge, London 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Habermas J., „Rozumne” versus „prawdziwe” – albo moralność obrazów świata, [w:] idem, Uwzględniając Innego…, s. 85–110.
View in Google Scholar
Habermas J., Pojednanie przez publiczne użycie rozumu, [w:] idem, Uwzględniając Innego, tłum. A. Romaniuk, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2009.
View in Google Scholar
Hampton J., Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory?, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1980, t. 77, nr 6, s. 315–338, https://doi.org/10.2307/2025640.
View in Google Scholar
Hampton J., Should Political Philosophy by Done without Metaphysics?, „Ethics” 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 791–814, https://doi.org/10.1086/293122.
View in Google Scholar
Harman G., Three Trends in Moral and Political Philosophy, „The Journal of Value Inquiry” 2003, t. 37, nr 3, s. 415–425, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:INQU.0000013350.42507.c6.
View in Google Scholar
Harsanyi J. C., Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory, „American Political Science Review” 1975, t. 69, nr 2, s. 594–606, https://doi.org/10.2307/1959090.
View in Google Scholar
Hart H. L. A., Pojęcie prawa, tłum. J. Woleński, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1998.
View in Google Scholar
Haslett D. W., What Is Wrong with Reflective Equilibria?, „The Philosophical Quarterly” 1987, t. 37, s. 305–311, https://doi.org/10.2307/2220400.
View in Google Scholar
Hauser M. D., Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong, Harper Collins, New York 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Hauser M. D., Young L., Cushman F., On Misreading the Linguistic Analogy: Response to Jesse Prinz and Ron Mallon, [w:] Moral Psychology. Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (red.), MIT Press, Cambridge MA 2008, s. 171–179.
View in Google Scholar
Hauser M. D., Young L., Cushman F., Reviving Rawls’s Linguistic Analogy: Operative Principles and the Causal Structure of Moral Actions, [w:] Moral Psychology…, s. 107–143.
View in Google Scholar
Hedrick T., Rawls and Habermas: Reason, Pluralism, and the Claims of Political Philosophy, Stanford University Press, Stanford 2010.
View in Google Scholar
Held V., On Rawls and Self-Interest, „Midwest Studies In Philosophy” 1976, t. 1, nr 1, s. 57–60, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1976.tb00011.x.
View in Google Scholar
Hill T. E., Autonomy and Self-Respect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991.
View in Google Scholar
Hill T. E., Kantian Constructivism in Ethics, „Ethics”, 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 752–770, https://doi.org/10.1086/293120.
View in Google Scholar
Hill T. E., The Stability Problem in Political Liberalism, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1994, t. 75(3–4), s. 333–352, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00134.x.
View in Google Scholar
Holt J. P., The Requirements of Justice and Liberal Socialism, „Analyse & Kritik” 2017, t. 39, nr 1, s. 171–194, https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2017-0011.
View in Google Scholar
Huemer M., Rawls’s Problem of Stability, „Social Theory and Practice” 1996, t. 22, nr 3, s. 375–395, https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract199622311.
View in Google Scholar
James A., Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 2005, t. 33, nr 3, s. 281–316, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00034.x.
View in Google Scholar
John Rawls’ Theory of Social Justice: An Introduction, H. G. Blocker, E. H. Smith (red.), Ohio University Press, Athens OH 1980.
View in Google Scholar
Johnson C., ActualV. (Rawlsian) Hypothetical-Consent, „Philosophical Studies” 1975, t. 28, nr 1, s. 41–48, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00356609.
View in Google Scholar
Johnson M., There is no Moral Faculty, „Philosophical Psychology” 2012, t. 25, nr 3, s. 409–432, https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.579423.
View in Google Scholar
Jones L. G., Should Christians Affirm Rawls’ Justice as Fairness? A Response to Professor Beckley, „Journal of Religious Ethics” 1988, t. 16, nr 2, s. 251–271.
View in Google Scholar
Junker-Kenny M., Religion and Public Reason. A Comparison of the Positions of John Rawls, Jürgen Habermas and Paul Ricoeur, De Gruyter, Berlin 2014.
View in Google Scholar
Kaufman A., Rawls and Kantian Constructivism, „Kantian Review” 2012, t. 17, nr 2, s. 227–256, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415412000040.
View in Google Scholar
Kaufman A., Rawls’s Practical Conception of Justice: Opinion, Tradition and Objectivity in Political Liberalism, „Journal of Moral Philosophy” 2006, t. 3, nr 1, s. 23–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/1740468106063281.
View in Google Scholar
Kędziora K., Henry Sidgwick i John Rawls o neutralności normatywnej teorii moralnej, „Etyka” 2008, t. 41, s. 130–146.
View in Google Scholar
Kelly E., McPherson L., On Tolerating the Unreasonable, „Journal of Political Philosophy” 2001, t. 9, nr 1, s. 38–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00117.
View in Google Scholar
Keyt D., The Social Contract as an Analytic, Justificatory, and Polemic Device, „Canadian Journal of Philosophy” 1974, t. 4, nr 2, s. 241–252.
View in Google Scholar
Klosko G., Political Constructivism in Rawl’s Political Liberalism, „American Political Science Review” 1997, t. 91, nr 3, s. 635–646, https://doi.org/10.2307/2952079.
View in Google Scholar
Klosko G., Rawls’s Argument from Political Stability, „Columbia Law Review” 1994, t. 94, nr 6, s. 1882–1897, https://doi.org/10.2307/1123184.
View in Google Scholar
Kok-Chor T., Justice and Personal Pursuits, „The Journal of Philosophy” 2004, t. 101, nr 7, s. 331–362.
View in Google Scholar
Korsgaard Ch. M., The Constitution of Moral Agency, Oxford University Press, New York 2008.
View in Google Scholar
Korsgaard Ch. M., The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
View in Google Scholar
Krasnoff L., Consensus, Stability, and Normativity in Rawl’s Political Liberalism, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1998, t. 95, nr 6, s. 269–292, https://doi.org/10.2307/2564560.
View in Google Scholar
Krasnoff L., How Kantian is Constructivism?, „Kant-Studien” 1999, t. 90, nr 4, s. 385–409, https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1999.90.4.385.
View in Google Scholar
Krzynówek A., Rozum a porządek polityczny, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2010.
View in Google Scholar
Kukathas Ch., Pettit P., Rawls: A Theory of Justice and Its Critics, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1990.
View in Google Scholar
Kymlicka W., Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality, „Ethics” 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 883–905, https://doi.org/10.1086/293125.
View in Google Scholar
Kymlicka W., Współczesna filozofia polityczna, tłum. A. Pawelec, Aletheia, Warszawa 2009.
View in Google Scholar
Ladenson R. F., Rawls’ Principle of Equal Liberty, „Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition” 1975, t. 28, nr 1, s. 49–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00356610.
View in Google Scholar
Langvatn S. A., Legitimate, but Unjust; Just, but Illegitimate: Rawls on Political Legitimacy, „Philosophy & Social Criticism” 2015, t. 42, nr 2, s. 132–153, https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453715615386.
View in Google Scholar
Larmore Ch., Political Liberalism, „Political Theory” 1990, t. 18, nr 3, s. 339–360, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591790018003001.
View in Google Scholar
Larmore Ch., The Morals of Modernity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
View in Google Scholar
Lehning P. B., The Idea of Public Reason: Can It Fulfill Its Task? AReply to Catherine Audard, „Ratio Juris” 1995, t. 8, nr 1, s. 30–39, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1995.tb00195.x.
View in Google Scholar
Lessnoff M., Barry on Rawls’ Priority of Liberty, „Philosophy Public Affairs” 1974, t. 4, nr 1, s. 100–114.
View in Google Scholar
Lessnoff M., Social Contract, Macmillan, Houndmills 1986.
View in Google Scholar
Lloyd S. A., Relativizing Rawls, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 709–735.
View in Google Scholar
Lovett F., Rawls’s A Theory of Justice. A Reader’s Guide, Continuum, London 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Macedo S., Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls, „Ethics” 1995, t. 105, nr 3, s. 468–496, https://doi.org/10.1086/293723.
View in Google Scholar
Mallon R., Reviving Rawls’s Linguistic Analogy Inside and Out, [w:] Moral Psychology…, s. 145–155.
View in Google Scholar
Mandle J., Having It Both Ways, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1994, t. 75, nr 3–4, s. 295–317, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00132.x.
View in Google Scholar
Mandle J., Rawls’s A Theory of Justice. An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.
View in Google Scholar
Marshall J., The Failure Of Contract as Justification, „Social Theory and Practice” 1975, t. 3, nr 4, s. 441–459.
View in Google Scholar
Martin R., Rawls’s New Theory of Justice, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 737–761.
View in Google Scholar
Massey S. J., Is Self-Respect a Moral or a Psychological Concept?, „Ethics” 1983, t. 93, nr 2, s. 246–261, https://doi.org/10.1086/292432.
View in Google Scholar
McCarthy T., Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue, „Ethics” 1994, t. 105, nr 1, s. 44–63, https://doi.org/10.1086/293678.
View in Google Scholar
McClennen E. F., Justice and the Problem of Stability, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1989, t. 18, nr 1, s. 3–30.
View in Google Scholar
McMahon Ch., Reasonable Disagreement. A Theory of Political Morality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.
View in Google Scholar
McPherson T., The Methodological Irrelevance of Reflective Equilibrium, [w:] The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods, C. Daly (red.), Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmills 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Michelman F. I., „Constitution (Written or Unwritten)”: Legitimacy and Legality in the Thought John Rawls, „Ratio Juris” 2018, t. 31, nr 4, s. 379–395, https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12222.
View in Google Scholar
Michelman F. I., In Pursuit of Constitutional Welfare Rights: One View of Rawls’ Theory of Justice, „University of Pennsylvania Law Review” 1973, t. 121, nr 5, s. 962–1019, https://doi.org/10.2307/3311279.
View in Google Scholar
Mikhail J., Chomsky and Moral Philosophy, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky, J. McGilvray (red.), wydanie drugie, Oxford University Press, New York 2017, s. 235–253.
View in Google Scholar
Mikhail J., Elements of Moral Cognition. Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Milo R., Contractarian Constructivism, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1995, t. 92, nr 4, s. 181–204, https://doi.org/10.2307/2940922.
View in Google Scholar
Moore R., Rawls On Constitution-Making, „Nomos” 1979, t. 20, s. 238–268.
View in Google Scholar
Nagel T., Justice and Nature, „Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 1997, t. 17, nr 2, s. 303– 321, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/17.2.303.
View in Google Scholar
Nelson E., From Primary Goods to Capabilities: Distributive Justice and the Problem of Neutrality, „Political Theory” 2008, t. 36, nr 1, s. 93–122, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707310088.
View in Google Scholar
Nielsen K., Considered Judgements Again, „Human Studies” 1982, t. 5, nr 1, s. 109–118, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02127671.
View in Google Scholar
Nozick R., Anarchia, państwo, utopia, tłum. P. Maciejko, M. Szczubiałka, Aletheia, Warszawa 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Nussbaum M. C., Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2006.
View in Google Scholar
O’Neill O., Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990.
View in Google Scholar
O’Neill O., Ethical Reasoning and Ideological Pluralism, „Ethics” 1988, t. 98, nr 4, s. 705–722, https://doi.org/10.1086/293000.
View in Google Scholar
O’Neill O., Political Liberalism and Public Reason: A Critical Notice of John Rawls Political Liberalism, „Philosophical Review” 1997, t. 106, nr 3, s. 411–428, https://doi.org/10.2307/2998399.
View in Google Scholar
Päivänsalo V., Balancing Reasonable Justice: John Rawls and Crucial Steps Beyond, Ashgate, Aldershot 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Papish L., The Changing Shape of Korsgaard’s Understanding of Constructivism, „The Journal of Value Inquiry” 2011, t. 45, nr 4, s. 451–463, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-011-9295-8.
View in Google Scholar
Parfit D., Later Selves and Moral Principles, [w:] Philosophy and Personal Relations, A. Montefiore (red.), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1973, s. 137–169.
View in Google Scholar
Parijs P. van, Rawlsians, Christians and Patriots: Maximin Justice and Individual Ethics, „European Journal of Philosophy” 1993, t. 1, nr 3, s. 309–342, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.1993.tb00088.x.
View in Google Scholar
Parijs P. van, Why Surfers Should be Fed: The Liberal Case for an Unconditional Basic Income, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1991, t. 20, nr 2, s. 101–131.
View in Google Scholar
Parker R. B., The Jurisprudential Uses of John Rawls, „Nomos” 1979, t. 20, s. 269–295.
View in Google Scholar
Pogge T., John Rawls, His Life and Theory of Justice, tłum. M. Kosch, Oxford University Press, New York 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Pogge T., Realizing Rawls, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1989. Porębski Cz., Umowa społeczna. Renesans idei, Znak, Kraków 1991.
View in Google Scholar
Prinz J. J., Resisting the Linguistic Analogy: A Commentary on Hauser, Young, and Cushman, [w:] Moral Psychology…, s. 157–170.
View in Google Scholar
Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond, M. O’Neill, T. Williamson (red.), Blackwell Publishing, Chichester 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Prostak R., Rzecz o sprawiedliwości: komunitarystyczna krytyka współczesnego liberalizmu amerykańskiego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2004.
View in Google Scholar
Rawls and religion, T. Bailey, V. Gentile (red.), Columbia University Press, New York 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Raz J., Disagreement in Politics, „The American Journal of Jurisprudence” 1998, t. 43, nr 1, s. 25–52, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/43.1.25.
View in Google Scholar
Raz J., Facing Diversity. The Case of Epistemic Abstinence, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 1990, t. 19, nr 1, s. 3–46.
View in Google Scholar
Reading Rawls. Critical Studies on Rawls’ A Theory of Justice, N. Daniels (red.), Basic Books, New York 1975.
View in Google Scholar
Reidy D. A., Rawls’s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough, „Res Publica” 2000, t. 6, nr 1, s. 49–72, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009628330727.
View in Google Scholar
Reidy D. A., Rawlson Philosophy and Democracy: Lessons from the Archived Papers, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 2017, t. 78, nr 2, s. 265–274, https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2017.0014.
View in Google Scholar
Reidy D. A., Reciprocity and Reasonable Disagreement: From Liberal to Democratic Legitimacy, „Philosophical Studies” 2006, t. 132, nr 2, s. 243–291, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-2216-6.
View in Google Scholar
Richards D. A., Public Reason and Abolitionist Dissent, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 787–842.
View in Google Scholar
Rorty R., Pierwszeństwo demokracji wobec filozofii, [w:] idem, Obiektywność, relatywizm i prawda, tłum. J. Margański, Aletheia, Warszawa 1999, s. 261–291.
View in Google Scholar
Rorty R., Pierwszeństwo demokracji wobec filozofii, tłum. J. Margański, [w:] idem, Obiektywność, relatywizm i prawda. Pisma filozoficzne. Tom 1, Aletheia, Warszawa 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Rousseau J. J., Umowa społeczna. Uwagi o rządzie polskim. List o widowiskach, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii, PWN, Warszawa 1966.
View in Google Scholar
Rupniewski M., Prawo jako narzędzie sprawiedliwej kooperacji w społeczeństwie demokratycznym: filozofia polityczna Johna Rawlsa z perspektywy prawniczej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Sachs D., How to Distinguish Self-Respect from Self-Esteem, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1981, t. 10, nr 4, s. 346–360.
View in Google Scholar
Sadurski W., Teoria sprawiedliwości. Podstawowe zagadnienia, PWN, Warszawa 1988.
View in Google Scholar
Sandel M. J., Liberalizm a granice sprawiedliwości, tłum. A. Grobler, Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, Warszawa 2009.
View in Google Scholar
Sandel M., Political Liberalism, „Harvard Law Review” 1994, t. 107, s. 1765–1794, https://doi.org/10.2307/1341828.
View in Google Scholar
Scanlon T. M., Justice, Responsibility, and the Demands of Equality, [w:] The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen, Ch. Sypnowich (red.), Oxford University Press, New York 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Scanlon T. M., Moral Theory: Understanding and Disagreement, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 1995, t. 55, nr 2, s. 343–356, https://doi.org/10.2307/2108551.
View in Google Scholar
Scanlon T. M., The Aims and Authority of Moral Theory, „Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 1992, t. 12, nr 1, s. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/12.1.1.
View in Google Scholar
Scanlon T. M., What We Owe to Each Other, Harvard University Press, Harvard 1998.
View in Google Scholar
Schaller W. E., Rawls, the Difference Principle, and Economic Inequality, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1998, t. 79, nr 4, s. 368–391.
View in Google Scholar
Scheffler S., Moral Independence and the Original Position, „Philosophical Studies” 1979, t. 35, nr 4, s. 397–403, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368054.
View in Google Scholar
Scheffler S., Moral Scepticism and Ideals of the Person, „The Monist” 1979, t. 62, nr 3, s. 288–303, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197962322.
View in Google Scholar
Scheffler S., The Appeal of Political Liberalism, „Ethics” 1994, t. 105, nr 1, s. 4–22, https://doi.org/10.1086/293676.
View in Google Scholar
Scheffler S., What is Egalitarianism?, „Philosophy Public Affairs” 2003, t. 31, nr 1, s. 5–39, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00005.x.
View in Google Scholar
Schroeter F., Reflective Equilibrium and Antitheory, „Noûs” 2004, t. 38, nr 1, s. 110–134, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2004.00464.x.
View in Google Scholar
Schwartz A., Moral Neutrality and Primary Goods, „Ethics” 1973, t. 83, nr 4, s. 294–307, https://doi.org/10.1086/291888.
View in Google Scholar
Sencerz S., Moral Intuitions and Justification in Ethics, „Philosophical Studies” 1986, t. 50, nr 1, s. 77–95, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355162.
View in Google Scholar
Sepczyńska D., Problematyczny status prawdy w polityce: Strauss, Rawls, Habermas, Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych „Universitas”, Kraków 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Sher G., Effort, Ability, and Personal Desert, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1979, t. 8, nr 4, s. 361–376.
View in Google Scholar
Shue H., Liberty and Self-Respect, „Ethics” 1975, t. 85, nr 3, s. 195–203, https://doi.org/10.1086/291957.
View in Google Scholar
Sidgwick H., The Methods of Ethics, wydanie siódme, Macmillan, London 1907.
View in Google Scholar
Singer P., Ethics and Intuitions, „The Journal of Ethics” 2005, t. 9, nr 3/4, s. 331–352, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-005-3508-y.
View in Google Scholar
Singer P., Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium, „The Monist” 1974, t. 57, s. 490–517, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197458330.
View in Google Scholar
Slote M. A., Desert, Consent, and Justice, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1973, t. 2, nr 4, s. 323–347.
View in Google Scholar
Solum L. B., Inclusive Public Reason, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1994, t. 75, nr 3–4, s. 217–231, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00128.x.
View in Google Scholar
Solum L. B., Situating Political Liberalism, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 549–588.
View in Google Scholar
Stark C. A. Hypothetical Consent and Justification, „The Journal of Philosophy” 2000, t. 97, nr 6, s. 313–334, https://doi.org/10.2307/2678406.
View in Google Scholar
Stoner I., Swartwood J., Fanciful Examples, „Metaphilosophy” 2017, t. 48, nr 3, s. 325–344, https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12234.
View in Google Scholar
Strasnick S., Social Choice and the Derivation of Rawls’s Difference Principle, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1976, t. 73, nr 4, s. 85–99, https://doi.org/10.2307/2025509.
View in Google Scholar
Sullivan D., Rules, Fairness, and Formal Justice, „Ethics” 1975, t. 85, nr 4, s. 322–331, https://doi.org/10.1086/291971.
View in Google Scholar
Svein E., Why Reflective Equilibrium? I: Reflexivity of Justification, „Ratio Juris” 2014, t. 27, nr 1, s. 138–154, https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12035.
View in Google Scholar
Szahaj A., Jednostka czy wspólnota: spór liberałów z komunitarystami a „sprawa polska”, Aletheia, Warszawa 2000.
View in Google Scholar
Taylor R. S., Rawls’s Defense of the Priority of Liberty: A Kantian Reconstruction, „Philosophy Public Affairs” 2003, t. 31 nr 3, s. 246–271, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00246.x.
View in Google Scholar
Tersman F., Recent Work on Reflective Equilibrium and Method in Ethics, „Philosophy Compass” 2018, t. 13, nr 6, e12493 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12493.
View in Google Scholar
The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, S. Freeman (red.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003.
View in Google Scholar
The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, J. Mandle, D. Reidy (red.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
View in Google Scholar
The Philosophy of Rawls. A Collection of Essays, H. S. Richardson, P. J. Weithman (red.), Garland, New York 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Thomas A., Republic of Equals. Predistribution and Property-Owning Democracy, Oxford University Press, New York 2017.
View in Google Scholar
Timmons M., Foundationalism and the Structure of Ethical Justification, „Ethics” 1987, t. 97, nr 3, s. 595–609, https://doi.org/10.1086/292868.
View in Google Scholar
Timmons M., The Limits of Moral Constructivism, „Ratio” 2003, t. 16, nr 4, s. 391–423, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9329.2003.00230.x.
View in Google Scholar
Tugendhat E., Comments on some Methodological Aspects of Rawls’ „Theory of Justice”, „Analyse & Kritik” 1979, t. 1, nr 1, s. 77–89, https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1979-0106.
View in Google Scholar
VanDeVeer D., Of Beasts, Persons, and the Original Position, „The Monist” 1979, t. 62, nr 3, s. 368–377, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197962325.
View in Google Scholar
Waldron J., Disagreements about Justice, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1994, t. 75, nr 3–4, s. 372–387, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00136.x.
View in Google Scholar
Waldron J., Law and Disagreement, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Walzer M., Sfery sprawiedliwości. Obrona pluralizmu i równości, tłum. M. Szczubiałka, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Weber E. T., Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism. On the Epistemology of Justice, Continuum, London 2010.
View in Google Scholar
Weithman P. J., Religion and the Obligations of Citizenship, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.
View in Google Scholar
Weithman P., Autonomy and Disagreement about Justice in Political Liberalism, „Ethics” 2017, t. 128, nr 1, s. 95–122, https://doi.org/10.1086/692943.
View in Google Scholar
Weithman P., Why Political Liberalism? On John Rawls’s Political Turn, Oxford University Press, New York 2010.
View in Google Scholar
Williams A., Incentives, Inequality, and Publicity, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1998, t. 27, nr 3, s. 225–247, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00069.x.
View in Google Scholar
Wolff J., Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1998, t. 27, nr 2, s. 97–122, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00063.x.
View in Google Scholar
Young I. M., Rawls’s Political Liberalism, „Journal of Political Philosophy” 1995, t. 3, nr 2, s. 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.1995.tb00034.x.
View in Google Scholar
Żardecka-Nowak M., Rozum i obywatel. Idea rozumu politycznego oraz koncepcja jednostki we współczesnej filozofii polityki, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, Rzeszów 2007.
View in Google Scholar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Zgodnie z Komunikatem Prorektora UŁ ds. nauki dotyczącym systemu ScienceON od 15.09.2023 r. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego wprowadza dane o wszystkich publikacjach wydanych przez siebie...