John Rawls. Uzasadnienie, sprawiedliwość i rozum publiczny

A Companion to Rawls, J. Mandle, D. A. Reidy (red.), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester 2014.

Ackerman B., Political Liberalisms, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1994, t. 97, nr 7, s. 364– 386, https://doi.org/10.2307/2940935.

Ackerman B., Social Justice in the Liberal State, Yale University Press, New Haven 1980.

Anderson E. S., What is the Point of Equality?, „Ethics” 1999, t. 109, nr 2, s. 287–337, https://doi.org/10.1086/233897.

Andryszczak P., Droga do sprawiedliwego społeczeństwa w ujęciu Johna Rawlsa i Alasdaira MacIntyre’a: analiza krytyczna, Scriptum, Kraków 2015.

Anti-Theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism, S. G. Clarke, E. Simpson (red.), State University of New York Press, Albany NY 1989.

Arneson R. J., From Primary Goods to Capabilities to Well-being, „Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy” 2013, t. 16, nr 2, s. 179–195, https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.757910.

Arneson R. J., Primary Goods Reconsidered, „Noûs” 1990, t. 24, nr 3, s. 429–454, https://doi.org/10.2307/2215774.

Arrow K. J., Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls’s Theory of Justice, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1973, t. 70, nr 9, s. 245–263, https://doi.org/10.2307/2025006.

Audard C., John Rawls, Acumen, Stocksfield 2007.

Bagnoli C., Constructivism in Metaethics, [w:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), E. N. Zalta (red.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/constructivism-metaethics/ (dostęp: 4.02.2019).

Baier K., Justice and the Aims of Political Philosophy, „Ethics” 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 771–790, https://doi.org/10.1086/293121.

Bankovsky M., Perfecting Justice in Rawls, Habermas and Honneth. A Deconstructive Perspective, Bloomsbury Academic, London 2013.

Barry B., John Rawls and the Priority of Liberty, „Philosophy Public Affairs” 1973, t. 2, nr 3, s. 274–290.

Barry B., John Rawls and the Search for Stability, „Ethics” 1995, t. 105, nr 4, s. 874–915, https://doi.org/10.1086/293756.

Barry B., Justice as Impartiality, Oxford University Press, New York 1995.

Barry B., The Liberal Theory of Justice. Critical Examination of the Principal Doctrines in A Theory of Justice by John Rawls, Oxford University Press, New York 1973.

Barry Ch., Redistribution, [w:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), E. N. Zalta (red.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/redistribution/ (dostęp: 4.02.2019).

Bates S., The Motivation to be Just, „Ethics” 1974, t. 85, nr 1, s. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1086/291935.

Baynes K., Constructivism and Practical Reason in Rawls, „Analyse & Kritik” 1992, t. 14, nr 1, s. 18–32, https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1992-0102.

Beatty J., The Rationality of the „Original Position”: A Defense, „Ethics” 1983, t. 93, nr 3, s. 484–495, https://doi.org/10.1086/292461.

Beitz Ch. R., Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1979.

Benhabib S., The Methodological Illusions of Modern Political Theory. The Case of Rawls and Habermas, „Neue Hefte Fuer Philosophie” 1982, t. 21, s. 47–74.

Besch T. M., Constructing Practical Reason: O’Neill on the Grounds of Kantian Constructivism, „The Journal of Value Inquiry” 2008, t. 42, nr 1, s. 55–76, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-008-9097-9.

Bohman J., Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism: Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflict, „Political Theory” 1995, t. 23, nr 2, s. 253–279, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591795023002004.

Brandt R. B., The Science of Man and Wide Reflective Equilibrium, „Ethics” 1990, t. 100, nr 2, s. 259–278, https://doi.org/10.1086/293176.

Brighouse H., Political Equality in Justice as Fairness, „Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition” 1997, t. 86, nr 2, s. 155–184, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017942221913.

Brink D. O., Rawlsian Constructivism in Moral Theory, „Canadian Journal of Philosophy” 1987, t. 17, nr 1, s. 71–90.

Brower B. W., The Limits of Public Reason, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1994, t. 91, nr 1, s. 5–26, https://doi.org/10.2307/2940948.

Brudney D., Hypothetical Consent and Moral Force, „Law and Philosophy” 1991, t. 10, nr 3, s. 235–270, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00149798.

Brun G., Reflective Equilibrium Without Intuitions?, „Ethical Theory and Moral Practice” 2014, t. 17, nr 2, s. 237–252, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9432-5.

Buchanan A., Distributive Justice and Legitimate Expectations, „Philosophical Studies” 1975, t. 28, nr 6, s. 419–425, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00372903.

Buchanan J. M., A Hobbesian Interpretation of the Rawlsian Difference Principle, „Kyklos” 1976, t. 29, nr 1, s. 5–25, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1976.tb01958.x.

Carter A., The Evolution of Rawls’s Justification of Political Compliance: Part 1 of The Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls’s Theories of Justice, „Journal of Moral Philosophy” 2006, t. 3, nr 1, s. 7–21, https://doi.org/10.1177/1740468106063280.

Carter A., The Evolution of Rawls’s Justification of Political Compliance: Part 2 of The Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls’s Theories of Justice, „Journal of Moral Philosophy” 2006, t. 3, nr 2, s. 135–157, https://doi.org/10.1177/1740468106065489.

Charney E., Political Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and the Public Sphere, „American Political Science Review” 1998, t. 92, nr 1, s. 97–110, https://doi.org/10.2307/2585931.

Cohen G. A., On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2011.

Cohen G. A., Rescuing Justice and Equality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2008.

Cohen G. A., Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995.

Cohen J., A More Democratic Liberalism, „Michigan Law Review” 1994, t. 92, nr 6, s. 1503–1546, https://doi.org/10.2307/1289593.

Cohen J., Democratic Equality, „Ethics” 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 727–751, https://doi.org/10.1086/293119.

Cohen J., Pluralism and Proceduralism, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 589–618.

Cohen J., Taking People as They Are?, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 2001, t. 30, nr 4, s. 363–386, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00363.x.

Cohen J., The Economic Basis of Deliberative Democracy, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 1989, t. 6, nr 2, s. 25–50, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265052500000625.

Crocker L., Equality, Solidarity, and Rawls’ Maximin, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1977, t. 6, nr 3, s. 262–266.

Daniels N., Equality of What: Welfare, Resources, or Capabilities?, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 1990, t. 50, suplement, s. 273–296, https://doi.org/10.2307/2108044.

Daniels N., Justice and Justification. Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.

Daniels N., Moral Theory and the Plasticity of Persons, „The Monist” 1979, t. 62, nr 3, s. 265–287, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197962318.

Darwall S. L., Two Kinds of Respect, „Ethics” 1977, t. 88, nr 1, s. 36–49, https://doi.org/10.1086/292054.

De Marneffe P., Liberalism, Liberty, and Neutrality, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1990, t. 19, nr 3, s. 253–274.

De Marneffe P., Rawls’s Idea of Public Reason, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1994, t. 75, nr 3–4, s. 232–250, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00129.x.

Deigh J., Shame and Self-Esteem: A Critique, „Ethics” 1983, t. 93, nr 2, s. 225–245, https://doi.org/10.1086/292431.

Delaney C. F., Rawls on Method, „Canadian Journal of Philosophy” 1977, t. 7, nr 3, 153– 161, https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1977.10717045.

DeLue S. M., Aristotle, Kant and Rawls on Moral Motivation in a Just Society, „American Political Science Review” 1980, t. 74, nr 2, s. 385–393, https://doi.org/10.2307/1960634.

DeMarco J. P., Richmond S. A., A Note on the Priority of Liberty, „Ethics” 1977, t. 87, nr 3, s. 272–275, https://doi.org/10.1086/292041.

Depaul M. R., Balance and Refinement. Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry, Routledge, London 2001.

Development and Main Outlines in Rawls’s Theory of Justice, tom 1; The Two Principles and Their Justifications, tom 2; Opponents and Implications of A Theory of Justice, tom 3; Moral Psychology and Community, tom 4.

Diggs B. J., A Contractarian View of Respect for Persons, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 1981, t. 18, nr 4, s. 273–283.

Dombrowski D. A., Rawls and Religion. The Case for Political Liberalism, SUNY Press, New York 2001.

Dworkin R., Biorąc prawa poważnie, tłum. T. Kowalski, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1998.

Eberle Ch. J., Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.

Edmundson W. A., John Rawls. Reticent Socialist, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017.

Eggleston B., Accounting for the Data Intuitions in Moral Theory Selection, „Ethical Theory and Moral Practice” 2014, t. 17, nr 4, s. 761–774, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9478-4.

Elgin C. Z., Considered Judgment, Princeton University Press, Princenton 1999.

Elster J., Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992.

Eng S., Why Reflective Equilibrium? II: Following Up on Rawls’s Comparison of His Own Approach with a Kantian Approach, „Ratio Juris” 2014, t. 27, nr 2, s. 288–310, https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12039.

Eng S., Why Reflective Equilibrium? III: Reflective Equilibrium as a Heuristic Tool, „Ratio Juris” 2014, t. 27, nr 3, s. 440–459, https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12052.

Equality and Liberty. Analyzing Rawls and Nozick, J. A. Corlett (red.), Palgrave Macmillan, London 1991.

Esheté A., Contractarianism and the Scope of Justice, „Ethics” 1974, t. 85, nr 1, s. 38–49, https://doi.org/10.1086/291937.

Estlund D., Liberalism, Equality, and Fraternity in Cohen’s Critique of Rawls, „Journal of Political Philosophy” 1998, t. 6, nr 1, s. 99–112, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00048.

Estlund D., The Insularity of the Reasonable: Why Political Liberalism Must Admit the Truth, „Ethics” 1998, t. 108, nr 2, s. 252–275, https://doi.org/10.1086/233804.

Fallon R. H., A Constructivist Coherence Theory of Constitutional Interpretation, „Harvard Law Review” 1987, t. 100, nr 6, s. 1189–1286, https://doi.org/10.2307/1341158.

Fishkin J., Justice and Rationality: Some Objections to the Central Argument in Rawls’s Theory, „American Political Science Review” 1975, t. 69, nr 2, s. 615–629, https://doi.org/10.2307/1959092.

Forst R., Contexts of Justice. Political Philosophy beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism, tłum. J. M. M. Farell, University of California Press, Berkeley 2002.

Forst R., Justification and Critique. Towards a Critical Theory of Politics, tłum. C. Cronin, Polity Press, Cambridge 2014.

Forst R., Political Liberalism: A Kantian View, „Ethics” 2017, t. 128, nr 1, s. 123–144, https://doi.org/10.1086/692945.

Forst R., The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice, tłum. J. Flynn, Columbia University Press, New York 2012.

Fotion N., Theory vs. Anti-Theory in Ethics. A Misconceived Conflict, Oxford University Press, New York 2014.

Franklin R. M., In Pursuit of a Just Society: Martin Luther King, Jr., and John Rawls, „Journal of Religious Ethics” 1990, t. 18, nr 2.

Freeman S., Contractualism, Moral Motivation, and Practical Reason, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1991, t. 88, nr 6, s. 281–303, https://doi.org/10.2307/2026686.

Freeman S., Justice and the Social Contract. Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy, Oxford University Press, New York 2007.

Freeman S., Original Meaning, Democratic Interpretation, and the Constitution, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1992, t. 21, nr 1, s. 3–42.

Freeman S., Political Liberalism and the Possibilty of a Just Democratic Constitution, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 619–668.

Freeman S., Rawls, Routledge, London 2007.

Freeman S., Reason and Agreement in Social Contract Views, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1990, t. 19, nr 2, s. 122–157.

Freeman S., The Burdens of Public Justification: Constructivism, Contractualism, and publicity, „Politics, Philosophy & Economics” 2007, t. 6, nr 1, s. 5–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594x07073003.

Galston W. A., Cele liberalizmu, tłum. A. Pawelec, Znak, Kraków 1999.

Galston W. A., Moral Personality and Liberal Theory, „Political Theory” 1982, t. 10, nr 4, s. 492–519, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591782010004002.

Galston W. A., Pluralism and Social Unity, „Ethics” 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 711–726, https://doi.org/10.1086/293118.

Gauthier D., Morals by Agreement, Oxford University Press, New York 1986.

Gauthier D., The Social Contract as Ideology, „Philosophy & Public Aff s” 1977, t. 6, nr 2, s. 130–164.

Gibbard A., Disparate Goods and Rawls’ Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment, „Theory and Decision” 1979, t. 11, nr 3, s. 267–288, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00126381.

Greenawalt K., From the Bottom Up. Selected Essays, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.

Greenawalt K., On Public Reason, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 669–689.

Griffin S. M., Political Philosophy versus Political Theory: The Case of Rawls, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 691–707.

Gustafsson J. E., The Difference Principle Would Not Be Chosen behind the Veil of Ignorance, „The Journal of Philosophy” 2018, t. 115, nr 11, https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20181151134.

Guyer P., Principles of Justice, Primary Goodsand Categories of Right: Rawlsand Kant, „Kantian Review” 2018, t. 23, nr 4, s. 581–613, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415418000419.

Habermas and Rawls. Disputing the Political, J. G. Finlayson, F. Freyenhagen (red.), Routledge, London 2013.

Habermas J., „Rozumne” versus „prawdziwe” – albo moralność obrazów świata, [w:] idem, Uwzględniając Innego…, s. 85–110.

Habermas J., Pojednanie przez publiczne użycie rozumu, [w:] idem, Uwzględniając Innego, tłum. A. Romaniuk, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2009.

Hampton J., Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory?, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1980, t. 77, nr 6, s. 315–338, https://doi.org/10.2307/2025640.

Hampton J., Should Political Philosophy by Done without Metaphysics?, „Ethics” 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 791–814, https://doi.org/10.1086/293122.

Harman G., Three Trends in Moral and Political Philosophy, „The Journal of Value Inquiry” 2003, t. 37, nr 3, s. 415–425, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:INQU.0000013350.42507.c6.

Harsanyi J. C., Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory, „American Political Science Review” 1975, t. 69, nr 2, s. 594–606, https://doi.org/10.2307/1959090.

Hart H. L. A., Pojęcie prawa, tłum. J. Woleński, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1998.

Haslett D. W., What Is Wrong with Reflective Equilibria?, „The Philosophical Quarterly” 1987, t. 37, s. 305–311, https://doi.org/10.2307/2220400.

Hauser M. D., Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong, Harper Collins, New York 2006.

Hauser M. D., Young L., Cushman F., On Misreading the Linguistic Analogy: Response to Jesse Prinz and Ron Mallon, [w:] Moral Psychology. Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (red.), MIT Press, Cambridge MA 2008, s. 171–179.

Hauser M. D., Young L., Cushman F., Reviving Rawls’s Linguistic Analogy: Operative Principles and the Causal Structure of Moral Actions, [w:] Moral Psychology…, s. 107–143.

Hedrick T., Rawls and Habermas: Reason, Pluralism, and the Claims of Political Philosophy, Stanford University Press, Stanford 2010.

Held V., On Rawls and Self-Interest, „Midwest Studies In Philosophy” 1976, t. 1, nr 1, s. 57–60, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1976.tb00011.x.

Hill T. E., Autonomy and Self-Respect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991.

Hill T. E., Kantian Constructivism in Ethics, „Ethics”, 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 752–770, https://doi.org/10.1086/293120.

Hill T. E., The Stability Problem in Political Liberalism, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1994, t. 75(3–4), s. 333–352, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00134.x.

Holt J. P., The Requirements of Justice and Liberal Socialism, „Analyse & Kritik” 2017, t. 39, nr 1, s. 171–194, https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2017-0011.

Huemer M., Rawls’s Problem of Stability, „Social Theory and Practice” 1996, t. 22, nr 3, s. 375–395, https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract199622311.

James A., Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 2005, t. 33, nr 3, s. 281–316, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00034.x.

John Rawls’ Theory of Social Justice: An Introduction, H. G. Blocker, E. H. Smith (red.), Ohio University Press, Athens OH 1980.

Johnson C., ActualV. (Rawlsian) Hypothetical-Consent, „Philosophical Studies” 1975, t. 28, nr 1, s. 41–48, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00356609.

Johnson M., There is no Moral Faculty, „Philosophical Psychology” 2012, t. 25, nr 3, s. 409–432, https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.579423.

Jones L. G., Should Christians Affirm Rawls’ Justice as Fairness? A Response to Professor Beckley, „Journal of Religious Ethics” 1988, t. 16, nr 2, s. 251–271.

Junker-Kenny M., Religion and Public Reason. A Comparison of the Positions of John Rawls, Jürgen Habermas and Paul Ricoeur, De Gruyter, Berlin 2014.

Kaufman A., Rawls and Kantian Constructivism, „Kantian Review” 2012, t. 17, nr 2, s. 227–256, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415412000040.

Kaufman A., Rawls’s Practical Conception of Justice: Opinion, Tradition and Objectivity in Political Liberalism, „Journal of Moral Philosophy” 2006, t. 3, nr 1, s. 23–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/1740468106063281.

Kędziora K., Henry Sidgwick i John Rawls o neutralności normatywnej teorii moralnej, „Etyka” 2008, t. 41, s. 130–146.

Kelly E., McPherson L., On Tolerating the Unreasonable, „Journal of Political Philosophy” 2001, t. 9, nr 1, s. 38–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00117.

Keyt D., The Social Contract as an Analytic, Justificatory, and Polemic Device, „Canadian Journal of Philosophy” 1974, t. 4, nr 2, s. 241–252.

Klosko G., Political Constructivism in Rawl’s Political Liberalism, „American Political Science Review” 1997, t. 91, nr 3, s. 635–646, https://doi.org/10.2307/2952079.

Klosko G., Rawls’s Argument from Political Stability, „Columbia Law Review” 1994, t. 94, nr 6, s. 1882–1897, https://doi.org/10.2307/1123184.

Kok-Chor T., Justice and Personal Pursuits, „The Journal of Philosophy” 2004, t. 101, nr 7, s. 331–362.

Korsgaard Ch. M., The Constitution of Moral Agency, Oxford University Press, New York 2008.

Korsgaard Ch. M., The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.

Krasnoff L., Consensus, Stability, and Normativity in Rawl’s Political Liberalism, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1998, t. 95, nr 6, s. 269–292, https://doi.org/10.2307/2564560.

Krasnoff L., How Kantian is Constructivism?, „Kant-Studien” 1999, t. 90, nr 4, s. 385–409, https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1999.90.4.385.

Krzynówek A., Rozum a porządek polityczny, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2010.

Kukathas Ch., Pettit P., Rawls: A Theory of Justice and Its Critics, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1990.

Kymlicka W., Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality, „Ethics” 1989, t. 99, nr 4, s. 883–905, https://doi.org/10.1086/293125.

Kymlicka W., Współczesna filozofia polityczna, tłum. A. Pawelec, Aletheia, Warszawa 2009.

Ladenson R. F., Rawls’ Principle of Equal Liberty, „Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition” 1975, t. 28, nr 1, s. 49–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00356610.

Langvatn S. A., Legitimate, but Unjust; Just, but Illegitimate: Rawls on Political Legitimacy, „Philosophy & Social Criticism” 2015, t. 42, nr 2, s. 132–153, https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453715615386.

Larmore Ch., Political Liberalism, „Political Theory” 1990, t. 18, nr 3, s. 339–360, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591790018003001.

Larmore Ch., The Morals of Modernity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.

Lehning P. B., The Idea of Public Reason: Can It Fulfill Its Task? AReply to Catherine Audard, „Ratio Juris” 1995, t. 8, nr 1, s. 30–39, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1995.tb00195.x.

Lessnoff M., Barry on Rawls’ Priority of Liberty, „Philosophy Public Affairs” 1974, t. 4, nr 1, s. 100–114.

Lessnoff M., Social Contract, Macmillan, Houndmills 1986.

Lloyd S. A., Relativizing Rawls, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 709–735.

Lovett F., Rawls’s A Theory of Justice. A Reader’s Guide, Continuum, London 2011.

Macedo S., Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls, „Ethics” 1995, t. 105, nr 3, s. 468–496, https://doi.org/10.1086/293723.

Mallon R., Reviving Rawls’s Linguistic Analogy Inside and Out, [w:] Moral Psychology…, s. 145–155.

Mandle J., Having It Both Ways, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1994, t. 75, nr 3–4, s. 295–317, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00132.x.

Mandle J., Rawls’s A Theory of Justice. An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.

Marshall J., The Failure Of Contract as Justification, „Social Theory and Practice” 1975, t. 3, nr 4, s. 441–459.

Martin R., Rawls’s New Theory of Justice, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 737–761.

Massey S. J., Is Self-Respect a Moral or a Psychological Concept?, „Ethics” 1983, t. 93, nr 2, s. 246–261, https://doi.org/10.1086/292432.

McCarthy T., Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue, „Ethics” 1994, t. 105, nr 1, s. 44–63, https://doi.org/10.1086/293678.

McClennen E. F., Justice and the Problem of Stability, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1989, t. 18, nr 1, s. 3–30.

McMahon Ch., Reasonable Disagreement. A Theory of Political Morality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.

McPherson T., The Methodological Irrelevance of Reflective Equilibrium, [w:] The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods, C. Daly (red.), Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmills 2015.

Michelman F. I., „Constitution (Written or Unwritten)”: Legitimacy and Legality in the Thought John Rawls, „Ratio Juris” 2018, t. 31, nr 4, s. 379–395, https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12222.

Michelman F. I., In Pursuit of Constitutional Welfare Rights: One View of Rawls’ Theory of Justice, „University of Pennsylvania Law Review” 1973, t. 121, nr 5, s. 962–1019, https://doi.org/10.2307/3311279.

Mikhail J., Chomsky and Moral Philosophy, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky, J. McGilvray (red.), wydanie drugie, Oxford University Press, New York 2017, s. 235–253.

Mikhail J., Elements of Moral Cognition. Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011.

Milo R., Contractarian Constructivism, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1995, t. 92, nr 4, s. 181–204, https://doi.org/10.2307/2940922.

Moore R., Rawls On Constitution-Making, „Nomos” 1979, t. 20, s. 238–268.

Nagel T., Justice and Nature, „Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 1997, t. 17, nr 2, s. 303– 321, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/17.2.303.

Nelson E., From Primary Goods to Capabilities: Distributive Justice and the Problem of Neutrality, „Political Theory” 2008, t. 36, nr 1, s. 93–122, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707310088.

Nielsen K., Considered Judgements Again, „Human Studies” 1982, t. 5, nr 1, s. 109–118, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02127671.

Nozick R., Anarchia, państwo, utopia, tłum. P. Maciejko, M. Szczubiałka, Aletheia, Warszawa 1999.

Nussbaum M. C., Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2006.

O’Neill O., Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990.

O’Neill O., Ethical Reasoning and Ideological Pluralism, „Ethics” 1988, t. 98, nr 4, s. 705–722, https://doi.org/10.1086/293000.

O’Neill O., Political Liberalism and Public Reason: A Critical Notice of John Rawls Political Liberalism, „Philosophical Review” 1997, t. 106, nr 3, s. 411–428, https://doi.org/10.2307/2998399.

Päivänsalo V., Balancing Reasonable Justice: John Rawls and Crucial Steps Beyond, Ashgate, Aldershot 2007.

Papish L., The Changing Shape of Korsgaard’s Understanding of Constructivism, „The Journal of Value Inquiry” 2011, t. 45, nr 4, s. 451–463, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-011-9295-8.

Parfit D., Later Selves and Moral Principles, [w:] Philosophy and Personal Relations, A. Montefiore (red.), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1973, s. 137–169.

Parijs P. van, Rawlsians, Christians and Patriots: Maximin Justice and Individual Ethics, „European Journal of Philosophy” 1993, t. 1, nr 3, s. 309–342, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.1993.tb00088.x.

Parijs P. van, Why Surfers Should be Fed: The Liberal Case for an Unconditional Basic Income, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1991, t. 20, nr 2, s. 101–131.

Parker R. B., The Jurisprudential Uses of John Rawls, „Nomos” 1979, t. 20, s. 269–295.

Pogge T., John Rawls, His Life and Theory of Justice, tłum. M. Kosch, Oxford University Press, New York 2006.

Pogge T., Realizing Rawls, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1989. Porębski Cz., Umowa społeczna. Renesans idei, Znak, Kraków 1991.

Prinz J. J., Resisting the Linguistic Analogy: A Commentary on Hauser, Young, and Cushman, [w:] Moral Psychology…, s. 157–170.

Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond, M. O’Neill, T. Williamson (red.), Blackwell Publishing, Chichester 2012.

Prostak R., Rzecz o sprawiedliwości: komunitarystyczna krytyka współczesnego liberalizmu amerykańskiego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2004.

Rawls and religion, T. Bailey, V. Gentile (red.), Columbia University Press, New York 2015.

Raz J., Disagreement in Politics, „The American Journal of Jurisprudence” 1998, t. 43, nr 1, s. 25–52, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/43.1.25.

Raz J., Facing Diversity. The Case of Epistemic Abstinence, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 1990, t. 19, nr 1, s. 3–46.

Reading Rawls. Critical Studies on Rawls’ A Theory of Justice, N. Daniels (red.), Basic Books, New York 1975.

Reidy D. A., Rawls’s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough, „Res Publica” 2000, t. 6, nr 1, s. 49–72, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009628330727.

Reidy D. A., Rawlson Philosophy and Democracy: Lessons from the Archived Papers, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 2017, t. 78, nr 2, s. 265–274, https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2017.0014.

Reidy D. A., Reciprocity and Reasonable Disagreement: From Liberal to Democratic Legitimacy, „Philosophical Studies” 2006, t. 132, nr 2, s. 243–291, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-2216-6.

Richards D. A., Public Reason and Abolitionist Dissent, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 787–842.

Rorty R., Pierwszeństwo demokracji wobec filozofii, [w:] idem, Obiektywność, relatywizm i prawda, tłum. J. Margański, Aletheia, Warszawa 1999, s. 261–291.

Rorty R., Pierwszeństwo demokracji wobec filozofii, tłum. J. Margański, [w:] idem, Obiektywność, relatywizm i prawda. Pisma filozoficzne. Tom 1, Aletheia, Warszawa 1999.

Rousseau J. J., Umowa społeczna. Uwagi o rządzie polskim. List o widowiskach, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii, PWN, Warszawa 1966.

Rupniewski M., Prawo jako narzędzie sprawiedliwej kooperacji w społeczeństwie demokratycznym: filozofia polityczna Johna Rawlsa z perspektywy prawniczej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2015.

Sachs D., How to Distinguish Self-Respect from Self-Esteem, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1981, t. 10, nr 4, s. 346–360.

Sadurski W., Teoria sprawiedliwości. Podstawowe zagadnienia, PWN, Warszawa 1988.

Sandel M. J., Liberalizm a granice sprawiedliwości, tłum. A. Grobler, Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, Warszawa 2009.

Sandel M., Political Liberalism, „Harvard Law Review” 1994, t. 107, s. 1765–1794, https://doi.org/10.2307/1341828.

Scanlon T. M., Justice, Responsibility, and the Demands of Equality, [w:] The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen, Ch. Sypnowich (red.), Oxford University Press, New York 2006.

Scanlon T. M., Moral Theory: Understanding and Disagreement, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 1995, t. 55, nr 2, s. 343–356, https://doi.org/10.2307/2108551.

Scanlon T. M., The Aims and Authority of Moral Theory, „Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 1992, t. 12, nr 1, s. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/12.1.1.

Scanlon T. M., What We Owe to Each Other, Harvard University Press, Harvard 1998.

Schaller W. E., Rawls, the Difference Principle, and Economic Inequality, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1998, t. 79, nr 4, s. 368–391.

Scheffler S., Moral Independence and the Original Position, „Philosophical Studies” 1979, t. 35, nr 4, s. 397–403, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368054.

Scheffler S., Moral Scepticism and Ideals of the Person, „The Monist” 1979, t. 62, nr 3, s. 288–303, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197962322.

Scheffler S., The Appeal of Political Liberalism, „Ethics” 1994, t. 105, nr 1, s. 4–22, https://doi.org/10.1086/293676.

Scheffler S., What is Egalitarianism?, „Philosophy Public Affairs” 2003, t. 31, nr 1, s. 5–39, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00005.x.

Schroeter F., Reflective Equilibrium and Antitheory, „Noûs” 2004, t. 38, nr 1, s. 110–134, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2004.00464.x.

Schwartz A., Moral Neutrality and Primary Goods, „Ethics” 1973, t. 83, nr 4, s. 294–307, https://doi.org/10.1086/291888.

Sencerz S., Moral Intuitions and Justification in Ethics, „Philosophical Studies” 1986, t. 50, nr 1, s. 77–95, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355162.

Sepczyńska D., Problematyczny status prawdy w polityce: Strauss, Rawls, Habermas, Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych „Universitas”, Kraków 2015.

Sher G., Effort, Ability, and Personal Desert, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1979, t. 8, nr 4, s. 361–376.

Shue H., Liberty and Self-Respect, „Ethics” 1975, t. 85, nr 3, s. 195–203, https://doi.org/10.1086/291957.

Sidgwick H., The Methods of Ethics, wydanie siódme, Macmillan, London 1907.

Singer P., Ethics and Intuitions, „The Journal of Ethics” 2005, t. 9, nr 3/4, s. 331–352, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-005-3508-y.

Singer P., Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium, „The Monist” 1974, t. 57, s. 490–517, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197458330.

Slote M. A., Desert, Consent, and Justice, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1973, t. 2, nr 4, s. 323–347.

Solum L. B., Inclusive Public Reason, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1994, t. 75, nr 3–4, s. 217–231, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00128.x.

Solum L. B., Situating Political Liberalism, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1994, t. 69, nr 3, s. 549–588.

Stark C. A. Hypothetical Consent and Justification, „The Journal of Philosophy” 2000, t. 97, nr 6, s. 313–334, https://doi.org/10.2307/2678406.

Stoner I., Swartwood J., Fanciful Examples, „Metaphilosophy” 2017, t. 48, nr 3, s. 325–344, https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12234.

Strasnick S., Social Choice and the Derivation of Rawls’s Difference Principle, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1976, t. 73, nr 4, s. 85–99, https://doi.org/10.2307/2025509.

Sullivan D., Rules, Fairness, and Formal Justice, „Ethics” 1975, t. 85, nr 4, s. 322–331, https://doi.org/10.1086/291971.

Svein E., Why Reflective Equilibrium? I: Reflexivity of Justification, „Ratio Juris” 2014, t. 27, nr 1, s. 138–154, https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12035.

Szahaj A., Jednostka czy wspólnota: spór liberałów z komunitarystami a „sprawa polska”, Aletheia, Warszawa 2000.

Taylor R. S., Rawls’s Defense of the Priority of Liberty: A Kantian Reconstruction, „Philosophy Public Affairs” 2003, t. 31 nr 3, s. 246–271, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00246.x.

Tersman F., Recent Work on Reflective Equilibrium and Method in Ethics, „Philosophy Compass” 2018, t. 13, nr 6, e12493 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12493.

The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, S. Freeman (red.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003.

The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, J. Mandle, D. Reidy (red.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.

The Philosophy of Rawls. A Collection of Essays, H. S. Richardson, P. J. Weithman (red.), Garland, New York 1999.

Thomas A., Republic of Equals. Predistribution and Property-Owning Democracy, Oxford University Press, New York 2017.

Timmons M., Foundationalism and the Structure of Ethical Justification, „Ethics” 1987, t. 97, nr 3, s. 595–609, https://doi.org/10.1086/292868.

Timmons M., The Limits of Moral Constructivism, „Ratio” 2003, t. 16, nr 4, s. 391–423, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9329.2003.00230.x.

Tugendhat E., Comments on some Methodological Aspects of Rawls’ „Theory of Justice”, „Analyse & Kritik” 1979, t. 1, nr 1, s. 77–89, https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1979-0106.

VanDeVeer D., Of Beasts, Persons, and the Original Position, „The Monist” 1979, t. 62, nr 3, s. 368–377, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197962325.

Waldron J., Disagreements about Justice, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 1994, t. 75, nr 3–4, s. 372–387, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00136.x.

Waldron J., Law and Disagreement, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.

Walzer M., Sfery sprawiedliwości. Obrona pluralizmu i równości, tłum. M. Szczubiałka, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2007.

Weber E. T., Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism. On the Epistemology of Justice, Continuum, London 2010.

Weithman P. J., Religion and the Obligations of Citizenship, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.

Weithman P., Autonomy and Disagreement about Justice in Political Liberalism, „Ethics” 2017, t. 128, nr 1, s. 95–122, https://doi.org/10.1086/692943.

Weithman P., Why Political Liberalism? On John Rawls’s Political Turn, Oxford University Press, New York 2010.

Williams A., Incentives, Inequality, and Publicity, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1998, t. 27, nr 3, s. 225–247, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00069.x.

Wolff J., Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1998, t. 27, nr 2, s. 97–122, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00063.x.

Young I. M., Rawls’s Political Liberalism, „Journal of Political Philosophy” 1995, t. 3, nr 2, s. 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.1995.tb00034.x.

Żardecka-Nowak M., Rozum i obywatel. Idea rozumu politycznego oraz koncepcja jednostki we współczesnej filozofii polityki, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, Rzeszów 2007.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.