Powstanie i rozwój standardów sprawozdawczości zrównoważonego rozwoju w świetle teorii koalicji rzeczniczych

Jan Michalak

doi:10.18778/8331-939-1

Keywords: sustainable development, reporting standards, Global Reporting Initiative, European Sustainability Reporting Standards, International Sustainability Reporting Standards Board

Published: 24 November 2025

Categories: Economics and management, Open Access

Downloads

PDF (Polish)

The monograph addresses sustainable development reporting standards development, analyzing their origins, structure, and interrelationships from the perspective of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). The starting point is the evolution of the idea of sustainable development at the UN and EU forums. An important tool for implementing this idea are reporting systems, which enable the assessment of the effectiveness of actions and transparency towards stakeholders. In this context, three sustainable development reporting standards systems play a special role: GRI, EFRAG, and ISSB.
Author or the monograph advances the thesis that the development of reporting standards is not solely technical in nature, but is in fact a political and institutional process shaped by the clash of two advocacy coalitions: the precautionary coalition and the economic growth coalition. The research methods applied include comparative analysis of the standards, case studies of the organizations responsible for their development, and content analysis of comment letters submitted during public consultations.
The findings reveal substantial differences in the processes of developing GRI, EFRAG, and ISSB standards. These differences, in turn, translated into divergences in the final shape of the standards in terms of their purpose, target user groups, mandatory versus voluntary nature, scope of required disclosures, and approaches to materiality and time horizons. The monograph contributes to the scholarly literature by demonstrating that the formation of sustainability reporting standards should be understood as the outcome of interactions between advocacy coalitions and their influence on the design of sustainability reporting frameworks.

Aamodt, S. (2018). The ability to influence: A comparative analysis of the role of advocacy coalitions in Brazilian climate politics. Review of Policy Research, 35(3), 372–397.

Adams, C.A., Mueller, F. (2022). Academics and policymakers at odds: The case of the IFRS Foundation trustees’ consultation paper on sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(6), 1310–1333.

Adams, C.A., Alhamood, A., He, X., Tian, J., Wang, L., Wang, Y. (2021). The double-materiality concept. Application and issues. Wersja pobrana z: https://pureadmin.qub.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/250711076/GRI_The_double_materiality_concept.pdf (dostęp: 30.01.2025).

Alexander, D., Zeff, S., Ignatowski, R. (2018). Global Financial Reporting. The Past, Present and a Likely Future. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Nieoczywiste.

Allen, A., Ramanna, K. (2013). Towards an understanding of the role of standard setters in standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 66–90.

Alon, A., Dwyer, P.D. (2016). SEC’s acceptance of IFRS-based financial reporting: An examination based in institutional theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 48, 1–16.

Aras, G. (2020). Finance, sustainability, and business legitimacy. W: J.D.W. Rendtorff (red.), Handbook of Business Legitimacy: Responsibility, Ethics and Society (s. 1131–1145). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Baumüller, J., Sopp, K. (2021). Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: Review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 8–28.

Becker, K., Gronewold, U., Weiß, K. (2024). Using legitimacy strategies to secure organisational survival over time: The case of EFRAG. Accounting and Business Research, 1–31.

Birkland, T.A. (red.), (1998). Theories of the Policy Process. New York: Routledge.

Birkland, T..A. (2019). An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making. New York: Routledge.

Brooks, E. (2018). Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework to understand EU pharmaceutical policy. European Journal of Public Health, 28(suppl_3), 11–14.

Brown, H.S., De Jong, M., Lessidrenska, T. (2009). The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: A case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18(2), 182–200.

De Francesco, F., Pattyn, V., Salamon, H. (2024). The monitoring and evaluation challenges of the sustainable development goals: An assessment in three European countries. Sustainable Development, 32(3), 1913–1924.

de Villiers, C., Dimes, R., La Torre, M., Molinari, M. (2024). The International Sustainability Standards Board’s (ISSB) past, present, and future: Critical reflections and a research agenda. Pacific Accounting Review, 36(2), 255–273.

De Vries, C.E., Hobolt, S.B., Walter, S. (2021). Politicizing international cooperation: The mass public, political entrepreneurs, and political opportunity structures. International Organization, 75(2), 306–332.

Dragomir, V.D., Dumitru, M., Chersan, I.C., Gorgan, C., Păunescu, M. (2025). Double materiality disclosure as an emerging practice: The assessment process, impacts, risks, and opportunities. Accounting in Europe, 22(1), 103–140.

Dyczkowska, J., Szalacha, P. (2025). Double materiality concept in practice: Impact in a construction company. Management Decision. Case Report | February 20 2025.

Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.

Elkington, J. (June 25, 2018). 25 years ago I coined the phrase „triple bottom line”. Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review.

E-Vahdati, S., Aripin, N. (2023). Una revisión de la investigación de Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) con in-formes de sostenibilidad: conjunto de datos 1999–2020. Revista de Contabilidad, 26(2) (A Review of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Research with SustainabilityReporting: 1999–2020 dataset), 274–290.

Flower, J. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 1–17.

Fogarty, T.J., Hussein, M.E., Ketz, J.E. (1994). Political aspects of financial accounting standard setting in the USA. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(4), 24–46.

Giner, B., Arce, M. (2012). Lobbying on accounting standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on share-based payments. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 655–691.

Godfrey, J.M., Langfield-Smith, I.A. (2005). Regulatory capture in the globalisation of accounting standards. Environment and Planning A, 37(11), 1975–1993.

Gray, R., Bebbington, J., Walters, D. (1993). Accounting for the Environment. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Grushina, S.V. (2017). Collaboration by design: Stakeholder engagement in GRI sustainability reporting guidelines. Organization & Environment, 30(4), 366–385.

Higgins, C., Larrinaga, C. (2014). Sustainability reporting: Insights from institutional theory. W: J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, B. O’Dwyer (red.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (s. 273–285). New York: Routledge.

Ignatowski, R. (2009). Instytucjonalne uwarunkowania i otoczenie globalnych standardów rachunkowości. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Ingold, K. (2022). Studying EU politics through the ACF – Key challenges. W: Elgar Encyclopedia of European Union Public Policy (s. 567–574). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Jenkins-Smith, H. (1990). Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis. Brooks/Cole.

Jenkins-Smith, H.C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C.M., Ingold, K. (2018). The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program. Theories of the Policy Process, 4, 135–171.

Kamiński, R. (2022). Zrównoważony rozwój przedsiębiorstw jako przedmiot raportowania niefinansowego. Regulacje prawne i doświadczenia praktyczne w Unii Europejskiej i Polsce. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.

Kelman, S. (1987). Making Public Policy. New York: Basic Books.

Kolk, A. (1999). Evaluating corporate environmental reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(4), 225–237.

Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in sustainability reporting by the fortune global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 279–291.

Kolk, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 51–64.

Krasodomska, J. (2014). Informacje niefinansowe w sprawozdawczości spółek. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie. Seria Specjalna, Monografie, 232.

Kulczycka, J. (2019). Gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym w polityce i badaniach naukowych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo IGSMiE PAN.

Kulik, A., Dobler, M. (2023). Stakeholder participation in the ISSB’s standard-setting process: The consultations on the first exposure drafts on sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(7), s. 349–380.

Kwok, W.C.C., Sharp, D. (2005). Power and international accounting standard setting: Evidence from segment reporting and intangible assets projects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(1), 74–99.

Leeson, R., Kuszewski, J. (2023). GRI and stakeholder engagement: Setting standards in the public interest. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(4), 877–883.

Martens, W., Bui, C.N.M. (2023). An exploration of legitimacy theory in accounting literature. Open Access Library Journal, 10, 1–20.

Mattli, W. (2001). The politics and economics of international institutional standards setting: an introduction. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), 328–344.

Maystadt, P. (2013). Should IFRS Standards be more European? Mission to Reinforce the EU’s Contribution to the Development of International Accounting Standards. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST%2015614%202013%20INIT/EN/pdf (dostęp: 30.01.2025).

McDougall, L. (2016). Power and politics in the global health landscape: Beliefs, competition and negotiation among global advocacy coalitions in the policy-making process. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 5(5), 309.

Metz, F., Ingold, K. (2017). Politics of the precautionary principle: Assessing actors’ preferences in water protection policy. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 721–743.

Michnowski, L. (2008). Odnowiona Strategia Trwałego Rozwoju Unii Europejskiej: co z niej wynika dla Polski? Problemy Ekorozwoju, 3(2), 89–128.

Miles, S. (2019). Stakeholder theory and accounting. W: The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory (s. 173–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mintrom, M., Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.

Moneva, J.M., Archel, P., Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum, 30(2), 121–137.

Mulholland, E., Dimitrova, A., Hametner, M. (2018). SDG indicators and monitoring: Systems and processes at the global, European, and national level. ESDN Quarterly Report.

Munro, G.D., Ditto, P.H., Lockhart, L.K., Fagerlin, A., Gready, M., Peterson, E. (2002). Biased assimilation of sociopolitical arguments: Evaluating the 1996 US presidential debate. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 15–26.

O’Connor, M.K., Netting, F.E. (2011). Analyzing Social Policy: Multiple Perspectives for Critically Understanding and Evaluating Policy. John Wiley & Sons.

Pesci, C., Vola, P., Gelmini, L. (2023). Flattening or addressing complexity? The future role of GRI in light of the sustainability accounting (r)evolution. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(4), 792–814.

Pierce, J.J., Peterson, H.L., Jones, M.D., Garrard, S.P., Vu, T. (2017). There and back again: A tale of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 45(S1), S13–S46.

Ramanna, K. (2015). Thin political markets: The soft underbelly of capitalism. California Management Review, 57(2), 5–19.

Roberts, N.C., King, P.J. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), 147–175.

Rosicki, R. (2010). Międzynarodowe i europejskie koncepcje zrównoważonego rozwoju. Przegląd Naukowo-Metodyczny, 4, s. 44–56.

Sabatier, P.A., Weible, C.M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. W: P. Sabatier (red.), Theories of the Policy Process (s. 189–220). New York: Routledge.

Samelak, J. (2013). Ramy koncepcyjne zintegrowanego sprawozdania jako formy raportowania CSR. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 314, 155–165.

Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sewell, G.C. (2005). Actors, Coalitions, and the Framework Convention on Climate Change. Unpublished dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/33743/65177601-MIT.pdf?sequence=2 (dostęp: 30.01.2025).

Szarfenberg, R. (2016). Polityka publiczna – zagadnienia i nurty teoretyczne. Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 9(1), 45–75.

Tschopp, D., Huefner, R.J. (2015). Comparing the evolution of CSR reporting to that of financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 565–577.

Vola, P., Cantino, G., Gransinigh, S. (2025). Stakeholder theory and sustainability disclosure: A comparative analysis of different approaches. Corporate Ownership & Control, 22(2), 63–74.

von Malmborg, F. (2024). Explaining differences in policy learning in the EU „Fit for 55” climate policy package. European Policy Analysis, 10(3), 412–448.

Wagner, P., Ylä-Anttila, T. (2018). Who got their way? Advocacy coalitions and the Irish climate change law. Environmental Politics, 27(5), 872–891.

Wagner, R., Seele, P. (2017). Uncommitted deliberation? Discussing regulatory gaps by comparing GRI 3.1 to GRI 4.0 in a political CSR perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 146, 333–351.

Weible, C.M., Sabatier, P.A. (2007). A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. W: F. Fischer, G. Miller (red.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

Zeff, S. (1978). The rise of economic consequences. Journal of Accountancy, 146(6).

Zeff, S.A. (2002). „Political” lobbying on proposed standards: A challenge to the IASB. Accounting Horizons, 16(1), 43–54.

Zeff, S.A. (2010). Political lobbying on accounting standards – US, UK and international experience. Comparative International Accounting, 12, 624.

Deklaracja z Rio w sprawie środowiska i rozwoju, https://libr.sejm.gov.pl/tek01/txt/inne/1992.html (dostęp: 30.01.2025).

Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2022/2464 z dnia 14 grudnia 2022 r. w sprawie zmiany rozporządzenia (UE) nr 537/2014, dyrektywy 2004/109/WE, dyrektywy 2006/43/WE oraz dyrektywy 2013/34/UE w odniesieniu do sprawozdawczości przedsiębiorstw w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju.

Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2024/1760 z dnia 13 czerwca 2024 r. w sprawie należytej staranności przedsiębiorstw w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju oraz zmieniająca dyrektywę (UE) 2019/1937 i rozporządzenie (UE) 2023/2859 (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Dalej CSDDD lub Dyrektywa ws. Należytej Staranności).

EPRS 2015 The precautionary principle Definitions, applications and Governance | European Parliamentary Research Service Ramowa Konwencja Narodów Zjednoczonych w sprawie zmian klimatu, United Nations (UN), Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC) Paris Agreement, 2015.

Rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2020/852 z dnia 18 czerwca 2020 r. w sprawie ustanowienia ram ułatwiających zrównoważone inwestycje.

UNEP (2008). Sustainable Building, & Construction Initiative. The Kyoto protocol, the clean development mechanism, and the building and construction sector: A report for the UNEP sustainable buildings and construction initiative. UNEP/Earthprint.

UNEP-WCMC UNDP (2021). Creating a nature-positive future: The contribution of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures.

Wytyczne ONZ na temat biznesu i praw człowieka United Nations (UN), Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations.

Wytyczne Organizacji Współpracy Gospodarczej i Rozwoju (OECD) dla przedsiębiorstw wielonarodowych (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, 2011).

Wytyczne Organizacji Współpracy Gospodarczej i Rozwoju (OECD) Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct, 2018.

Komunikat Komisji do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady Europejskiej, Rady, Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów Europejski Zielony Ład COM/2019/640 fi al, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52019DC0640&qid=1653851156228 (dostęp: 20.01.2025).

http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf (dostęp: 15.01.2025).

https://climate-pact.europa.eu/about/about-pact_pl (dostęp: 10.02.2025). https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/energy-and-green-deal_pl (dostęp: 10.02.2025).

https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/finance-and-green-deal_pl (dostęp: 10.02.2025).

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/attachment/859390/Sustainable_industry_pl.pdf.pdf (dostęp: 10.02.2025).

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/pl/qanda_21_3662/QA)NDA_21_3662_EN.pdf (dostęp: 10.02.2025).

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_614 (dostęp: 30.06.2025).

https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/1_PL_ACT_part1_v1.pdf (dostęp: 20.01.2025).

https://efrag-website.azurewebsites.net/News/Public-371/Closing-of-the-EFRAG-public-consultation-on-the-Draft-ESRS-EDs- (dostęp: 15.09.2025).

https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-effi cy/energy-performance-buildings/renovation-wave_en (dostęp: 10.02.2025).

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0400 (dostęp 10.02.2025).

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0572 (dostęp: 10.02.2025).

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:300E:0487:0491:PL:PDF (dostęp: 13.06.2025).

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:5e601657-3b06-11eb-b27b-01aa75ed71a1.0013.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (dostęp: 10.02.2025).

https://libr.sejm.gov.pl/tek01/txt/inne/1992.html (dostęp: 30.01.2025).

https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-research-and-innovation/environment-and-climate/european-green-deal_en?prefLang=pl (dostęp: 10.02.2025).

https://sasb.ifrs.org/find-your-industry/ (dostęp: 12.06.2025).

https://tellus.org/about/the-institute (dostęp: 8.03.2025).

https://unfccc.int/first-biennial-transparency-reports (dostęp: 13.06.2025).

https://unfccc.int/NDCREG (dostęp: 13.06.2025).

https://www.cdsb.net/priorities/consistency-project/case-consistency (dostęp: 6.06.2025).

https://www.cdsb.net/sites/default/files/ccandir.pdf (dostęp: 6.06.2025).

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/02/24/council-adopts-position-on-the-corporate-sustainability-reporting-directive-csrd/ (dostęp: 21.06.2025).

https://www.efrag.org/en/about-us/governance/efrag-sustainability-reporting-board (dostęp: 30.06.2025).

https://www.efrag.org/en/news-and-calendar/news/efrag-releases-progress-report-on-esrs-simplification (dostęp: 30.06.2025).

https://www.efrag.org/en/news-and-calendar/news/press-release-efrag-shares-revised-esrs-exposure-drafts-and-launches-60day-public-consultation (dostęp: 15.09.2025).

https://www.efrag.org/en/sustainability-reporting/esrs-workstreams/sectorspecific-eres (dostęp: 30.06.2025).

https://www.efrag.org/system/files/sites/webpublishing/Project%20Documents/2106151549247651/EFRAG%20DPP%20for%20Sustainability%20Standard-Setting%20-%20Approved%20by%20GA%2016-03-2023.pdf (dostęp: 30.06.2025).

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/pl/sheet/293547/strategia-od-pola-do-stolu (dostęp: 10.02.2025).

https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/governance/ (dostęp: 30.06.2025).

https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/governance/stakeholder-council/ (dostęp: 15.09.2025).

https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/global-sustainability-standards-board/gssb-due-process/ (dostęp: 10.09.2025).

https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/global-sustainability-standards-board/gssb-members/ (dostęp: 30.06.2025).

https://www.gov.pl/web/fundusze-regiony/dyrektywa-w-sprawie-nalezytej-starannosci (dostęp: 6.06.2025).

https://www.ifrs.org/academics/ (dostęp: 10.06.2025).

https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/about-us/legal-and-governance/constitution-docs/due-process-handbook-2020.pdf (dostęp: 20.06.2025).

https://www.ifrs.org/groups/international-sustainability-standards-board/#members (dostęp: 30.06.2025).

https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements/ (dostęp: 25.06.2025).

https://www.ifrs.org/use-around-the-world/use-of-ifrs-standards-by-jurisdiction/#use-of-ifrs-accounting-standards-by-jurisdiction (dostęp: 28.06.2025).

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/experiment-equivalency-gri-esrs-david-baxter-66gpe/ (dostęp: 15.09.2025).

https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/double-materiality-what-is-it-and-why-does-it-matter/ (dostęp: 30.06.2025).

https://www.pism.pl/publikacje/szczyt-przyszlosci-onz-a-cele-zrownowazonego-rozwoju (dostęp: 7.04.2025).

https://www.un.org.pl/ (dostęp: 7.04.2025).

https://www.un.org/pga/wp-content/uploads/sites/109/2024/09/The-Pact-for-the-Future-final.pdf (dostęp: 7.04.2025).

https://www.unep.org/who-we-are/about-us (dostęp: 20.01.2025).

https://www.weforum.org/publications/toward-common-metrics-and-consistent-reporting-of-sustainable-value-creation/ (dostęp: 1.06.2025).

www.ceres.org/about (dostęp: 8.03.2025).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Michalak, Jan. 2025. The Development of Sustainability Reporting Standards in the Lens of Advocacy Coalition Theory. Management. Poland: Lodz University Press. https://doi.org/10.18778/8331-939-1.