The Psychology of Art

Adams R. B., Krrussl R., Navone M. A. i Verwijmeren P. (2017), Is gender in the eye of the beholder? Identifying cultural attitudes with art auction prices, „SSRN Electronic Journal” (grudzień), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3083500
View in Google Scholar

Alva N. (2011), Art and the limits of neuroscience, „The New York Times”, pobrano z http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/art-and-the-limits-of-neuroscience/?_r=0
View in Google Scholar

Appleton J. (1996), The Experience of Landscape, Wiley, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Barrett L. F., Mesquita B., Ochsner K. N. i Gross J. J. (2006), The experience of emotion, „Annual Review of Psychology”, nr 58, s. 373–403, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709
View in Google Scholar

Bellingham D. (2012), Attribution and the market: The case of Frans Hals, [w:] M. Aldrich i J. Hackford-Jones (red.), Art and Authenticity (s. 22–36), Lund Humphries, Farnham.
View in Google Scholar

Biederman I. (1987), Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding, „Psychological Review”, nr 94 (2), s. 115–147.
View in Google Scholar

Boden M. A. (2010), Creativity and Art: Three Roads to Surprise, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Brieber D., Nadal M. i Leder H. (2015), In the white cube: Museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art, „Acta Psychologica”, nr 154, s. 36–42, https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.actpsy.2014.11.004
View in Google Scholar

Bullot N. J. (2019), A psychohistorical philosophy for the science of the arts, [w:] S. Wuppuluri, D. Wu (red.), On Art and Science (s. 223–245), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27577-8_14
View in Google Scholar

Burghardt G. M. (2014), Play in fishes, frogs and reptiles, „Current Biology”, nr 25 (1), R9–R10, https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12312
View in Google Scholar

Carbon C.-C. (2017), Art perception in the museum: How we spend time and space in art exhibitions, „i-Perception”, nr 8 (1).
View in Google Scholar

Cavanagh P. (2005), The artist as neuroscientist, „Nature”, nr 434 (7031), s. 301–307, https://doi.org/10.1038/434301a
View in Google Scholar

Chipp H. B. (1968), Theories of Modern Art: A Source Book for Artists and Critics, University of California Press.
View in Google Scholar

Clegg H., Nettle D. i Miell D. (2011), Status and mating success amongst visual artists, „Frontiers in Psychology”, nr 2 (październik), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00310
View in Google Scholar

Cohen L., Gray F., Meyrignac C., Dehaene S. i Degos J. D. (1994), Selective deficit of visual size perception: Two cases of hemimicropsia, „Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry”, nr 57 (1), s. 73–78, https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.L73
View in Google Scholar

Corballis M. C. (2014), Left brain, right brain: Facts and fantasies, „PLoS Biology”, nr 12 (1), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001767
View in Google Scholar

Cunningham M. R., Roberts A. R., Barbee A. P., Druen P. B. i Wu C. H. (1995), „Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, nr 68 (2), s. 261–279, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261
View in Google Scholar

Cutting J. E. (2003), Gustave Caillebotte, French impressionism, and mere exposure, „Psychonomic Bulletin & Review”, nr 10 (2), s. 319–343, pobrano z: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12921411
View in Google Scholar

Dutton D. (2010), Instynkt sztuki, Bloomsbury Press, London.
View in Google Scholar

Elgammal A., Liu B., Elhoseiny M. i Mazzone M. (2017), CAN: Creative adversarial networks, generating „Art” by learning about styles and deviating from style norms, pobrano z: http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07068
View in Google Scholar

Elias M. i Cotte P. (2008), Multispectral camera and radiative transfer equation used to depict Leonardo’s sfumato in Mona Lisa, „Applied Optics”, nr 47 (12), s. 2146–2154, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.47.002146
View in Google Scholar

Ellamil M., Dobson C., Beeman M. i Christoff K. (2012), Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process, „NeuroImage”, nr 59 (2), s. 1783–1794, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008
View in Google Scholar

Faris J. C. (1988), „ART/artifact”: On the museum and anthropology, „Current Anthropology”, nr 29 (5), s. 775–779.
View in Google Scholar

Feist G. J. (1998), A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity, „Personality and Social Psychology Review”, nr 2 (4), s. 290–309, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
View in Google Scholar

Forder L., Bosten J., He X. i Franklin A. (2017), A neural signature of the unique hues, „Scientific Reports”, nr 7 (1), s. 1–8, pobrano z: www.nature.com/articles/srep42364
View in Google Scholar

Galton F. (1882), Conventional representation of the horse in motion, „Nature”, nr 26 (662), s. 228–229, https://doi.org/10.1038/026228a0
View in Google Scholar

Gibson J. J. (1950), The Perception of the Visual World, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
View in Google Scholar

Goldin C., Rouse C. (2000), Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of „blind” auditions on female musicians, „American Economic Review”, nr 90 (4), s. 715–741, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.715
View in Google Scholar

Gould S. J. (1991), Exaptation: A crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology, „Journal of Social Issues”, nr 47 (3), s. 43–65, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01822.x
View in Google Scholar

Graham D. J., Redies C. (2010), Statistical regularities in art: Relations with visual coding and perception, „Vision Research”, nr 50 (16), s. 1503–1509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.002
View in Google Scholar

Gruner S., Specker E. i Leder H. (2019), Effects of context and genuineness in the experience of art, „Empirical Studies of the Arts”, nr 37 (2), s. 138–152, https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418822896
View in Google Scholar

Hampton J. A. (2012), Thinking intuitively: The rich (and at times illogical) world of concepts, „Current Directions in Psychological Science”, nr 21 (6), s. 398–402, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412457364
View in Google Scholar

Harman O., Dietrich M. R. (red.), (2013), Outsider Scientists: Routes to Innovation in Biology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
View in Google Scholar

Hering E. (1964), Outlines of a Theory of the Light Sense, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
View in Google Scholar

Hockney D. (2001), Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the lost techniques of the Old Masters, Thames & Hudson, London [wydanie polskie: (2006), Wiedza tajemna: Sekrety technik malarskich Dawnych Mistrzów, Universitas, Kraków].
View in Google Scholar

Huang M., Bridge H., Kemp M. J. i Parker A. J. (2011), Human cortical activity evoked by the assignment of authenticity when viewing works of art, „Frontiers in Human Neuroscience”, nr 5 (listopad), s. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00134
View in Google Scholar

Hughes R. (1990), Nothing if Not Critical: Selected Essays on Art and Artists, Harvill Press, London.
View in Google Scholar

Hummel J. E. (2013), Object recognition, [w:] D. Reisburg (red.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology (s. 32–46), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Hutton N., Kelly L. (2013), Where lines are drawn, „Science”, nr 341 (wrzesień), s. 1453–1454.
View in Google Scholar

Ishizu T., Zeki S. (2013), The brain’s specialized systems for aesthetic and perceptual judgment, „European Journal of Neuroscience”, nr 37 (9), s. 1413–1420, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12135
View in Google Scholar

Ittelson W. H. (1951), Size as a cue to distance: Static localization, „The American Journal of Psychology”, nr 64 (1), s. 54–67, https://doi.org/10.2307/1418595
View in Google Scholar

Jauk E., Benedek M., Dunst B. i Neubauer A. C. (2013), The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection, „Intelligence”, nr 41 (4), s. 212–221, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003
View in Google Scholar

Kaufman S. C., Kozbelt A., Silvia P., Kaufman J. C., Ramesh S. i Feist J. G. (2014), Who finds Bill Gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement, „Jour¬nal of Creative Behavior”, nr 50 (4), s. 294–307, https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.78
View in Google Scholar

Keltner D., Haidt J. (2003), Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion, „Cognition and Emotion”, nr 17 (2), s. 297–314, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297
View in Google Scholar

Kemp M. (1990), The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat, Yale University Press, New Haven.
View in Google Scholar

Kemp M. (2014), Art in History, Profile Books, London.
View in Google Scholar

Kidd C., Hayden B. Y. (2015), The psychology and neuroscience of curiosity, „Neuron”, nr 88 (3), s. 449–460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.010
View in Google Scholar

Lanthony P. (1995), Les peintres gauchers, „Revue Neurologique”, nr 151 (3), s. 165–170.
View in Google Scholar

Lilienfeld S. O., Lynn S. J., Ruscio J. i Beyerstein B. L. (2010), The top ten myths of popular psychology, „Skeptic Magazine”, nr 15 (3), s. 36–43.
View in Google Scholar

Little S. (2004), -isms: Understanding Art, Bloomsbury, London [wydanie polskie: (2007), Sztuka. Kierunki, mistrzowie, arcydzieła, Publicat].
View in Google Scholar

Locher P. J., Dolese M. (2004), A comparison of the perceived pictorial and aesthetic qualities of original paintings and their postcard images, „Empirical Studies of the Arts”, nr 22 (2), s. 129–142, https://doi.org/10.2190/eqtc-09lf-jrha-xkjt
View in Google Scholar

Locher P. J., Smith J. K. i Smith L. F. (2001), The influence of presentation format and viewer training in the visual arts on the perception of pictorial and aesthetic qualities of paintings, „Perception”, nr 30 (4), s. 449–465, https://doi.org/10.1068/p3008
View in Google Scholar

MacDonald L., Moroviç J. (1995), Assessing the effects of gamut compression in the reproduction of fine art paintings, „Final Program and Proceedings – IS and T/SID Color Imaging Conference”, s. 194–200.
View in Google Scholar

Mackay D. M. (1957), Moving visual images produced by regular stationary patterns, „Nature”, nr 180, s. 849–850, pobrano z: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/181362c0.pdf
View in Google Scholar

MacNeil L., Driscoll A. i Hunt A. N. (2015), What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching, „Innovative Higher Education”, nr 40 (4), s. 291–303, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
View in Google Scholar

Mandelbrot B. B. (1967), How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension, „Science”, nr 156 (3775), s. 636–638.
View in Google Scholar

Marmor M. F., Ravin J. G. (2009), The Artist’s Eyes: Vision and the History of Art, Abrams, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Marr D., Nishihara H. K. (1978), Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes, „Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B”, nr 200 (1140), s. 269–294, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1978.0020
View in Google Scholar

Mather G. (2014a), Essentials of Sensation and Perception, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315787275
View in Google Scholar

Mather G. (2014b), The Psychology of Visual Art: Eye, Brain and Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Mather G. (2016), Foundations of Sensation and Perception (3 wyd.), Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672236
View in Google Scholar

Mather G. (2018), Visual image statistics in the history of western art, „Art and Perception”, nr 6 (2–3), s. 97–115, https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-20181092
View in Google Scholar

Mayer A. (2010), The physiological circus: Knowing, representing, and training horses in motion in nineteenth-century France, „Representations”, nr 111 (lato), s. 88–120, pobrano z: https://rep.ucpress.edu/content/111/1/88.short
View in Google Scholar

McMillan K. (2019), Representation of Female Artists in Britain during 2018, pobrane z: www.freelandsfoundation.co.uk/research/representation-of-female-artists-in-britain-2018
View in Google Scholar

Mendez M. F. (2004), Dementia as a window to the neurology of art, „Medical Hypotheses”, nr 63 (1), s. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2004.03.002
View in Google Scholar

Miller G. F. (2001), Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria, „Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts”, nr 2, s. 20–25, pobrano z: www.unm.edu/~gfmiller/new_papers2/miller2001aesthetic.doc
View in Google Scholar

Mollon J. (2006), Monge: The Verriest lecture, Lyon, lipiec 2005, „Visual Neuroscience”, nr 23, s. 297–309.
View in Google Scholar

Montague P. R., Berns G. S. (2002), Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation, „Neuron”, nr 36 (2), s. 265–284, pobrano z: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12383781
View in Google Scholar

Murakami I., Kitaoka A. i Ashida H. (2006), A positive correlation between fixation instability and the strength of illusory motion in a static display, „Vision Research”, nr 46 (15), s. 2421–2431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.030
View in Google Scholar

Nesse R. M. (1990), Evolutionary explanations of emotions, „Human Nature”, nr 1 (3), s. 261–289.
View in Google Scholar

Nettle D., Clegg H. (2006), Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans, „Proceedings of the Royal Society B”, nr 273 (1586), s. 611–615, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3349
View in Google Scholar

Nilsson D. E., Pelger S. (1994), A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve, „Proceedings of the Royal Society B”, nr 256 (1345), s. 53–58, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0048
View in Google Scholar

Nochlin L. (1971), Why have there been no great women artists?, [w:] A. Jones (red.), (2010), The Feminism and Visual Culture Reader (s. 229–233), Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar

Paris J. (2017), Is psychoanalysis still relevant to psychiatry?, „Canadian Journal of Psychiatry”, nr 62 (5), s. 308–312, https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743717692306
View in Google Scholar

Parraga C. A., Troscianko T. i Tolhurst D. J. (2000), The human visual system is optimised for processing the spatial information in natural visual images, „Current Biology”, nr 10 (1), s. 35–38, pobrano z: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10660301
View in Google Scholar

Pearce M. T., Zaidel D. W., Vartanian O., Skov M., Leder H., Chatterjee A. i Nadal M. (2016), Neuroaesthetics: The cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience, „Perspectives on Psychological Science”, nr 11 (2), s. 265–279, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621274
View in Google Scholar

Pelowski M., Forster M., Tinio P. P. L., Scholl M. i Leder H. (2017), Beyond the lab: An examination of key factors influencing interaction with „Real” and museum-based art, „Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts”, nr 11 (3), s. 245–264, https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000141
View in Google Scholar

Pepperell R. (2017), Imaging human vision: An artistic perspective, „IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging”, s. 261–267.
View in Google Scholar

Pepperell R., Haertel M. (2014), Do artists use linear perspective to depict visual space?, „Perception”, nr 43 (5), s. 395–416.
View in Google Scholar

Perry G. (2014), Playing to the Gallery, Penguin, London.
View in Google Scholar

Pidgeon L. M., Grealy M., Duffy A. H. B., Hay L., McTeague C., Vuletic T., Gilbert S. J. (2016), Functional neuroimaging of visual creativity: A systematic review and meta-analysis, „Brain and Behavior”, nr 6, e00540, https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.540
View in Google Scholar

Pinker S. (1997), How the Mind Works, W.W. Norton, New York [wydanie polskie: (2022), Jak działa umysł, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań].
View in Google Scholar

Pirenne M. H. (1952), The scientific basis of Leonardo da Vinci’s theory of perspective, „The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science”, nr 3 (10), s. 169–185.
View in Google Scholar

Pridmore R. W. (2006), 14th century example of the four unique hues, „Color Research and Application”, nr 31 (4), s. 364–365, https://doi.org/10.1002/col.20229
View in Google Scholar

Rankin K. P., Liu A. A., Howard S., Slama H., Hou C. E., Shuster K. i Miller B. L. (2007), A case-controlled study of altered visual art production in Alzheimer’s and FTLD, „Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology”, nr 20 (1), s. 48–61, https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0b013e31803141dd
View in Google Scholar

Rogers B. J., Naumenko O. (2016), Perception of straightness and parallelism with minimal distance information, „Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics”, s. 1381–1391, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1083-x
View in Google Scholar

Sayim B., Cavanagh P. (2011), What line drawings reveal about the visual brain, „Frontiers in Human Neuroscience”, nr 5 (październik), s. 118, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00118
View in Google Scholar

Schaedelin F. C., Taborsky M. (2009), Extended phenotypes as signals, „Biological Reviews”, nr 84, s. 293–313, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00075.x
View in Google Scholar

Scott-Phillips T. C., Dickins T. E. i West S. A. (2011), Evolutionary theory and the ultimate-proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences, „Perspectives on Psychological Science”, nr 6 (1), s. 38–47, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393528
View in Google Scholar

Seidel A., Prinz J. (2018), Great works: A reciprocal relationship between spatial magnitudes and aesthetic judgment, „Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts”, nr 12 (1), s. 2–10, https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000100
View in Google Scholar

Solomon S. G., Lennie P. (2007), The machinery of colour vision, „Nature Reviews Neuroscience”, nr 8 (4), s. 276–286, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2094
View in Google Scholar

Taylor R. P., Micolich A. i Jonas D. (1999), Fractal analysis of Pollock’s drip paintings, „Nature”, nr 399 (czerwiec), s. 422, pobrano z: www.mag.keio.ac.jp/~asako/Aethetics/03June1999pollock.doc
View in Google Scholar

Ullman S. (1989), Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition, „Cognition”, nr 32 (3), s. 193–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90036-X
View in Google Scholar

van der Feen F. E., Zickert N., Groothuis T. G. G. i Geuze R. H. (2019), Does hand skill asymmetry relate to creativity, developmental and health issues and aggression as markers of fitness?, „Laterality”, s. 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1619750
View in Google Scholar

Vartanian O. i Skov M. (2014), Neural correlates of viewing paintings: Evidence from a quantitative meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, „Brain and Cognition”, nr 87 (1), s. 52–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.004
View in Google Scholar

Vessel E. A., Starr G. G. i Rubin N. (2012), The brain on art: Intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network, „Frontiers in Human Neuroscience”, nr 6 (kwiecień), s. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00066
View in Google Scholar

Vishwanath D., Girshick A. R. i Banks M. S. (2005), Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place, „Nature Neuroscience”, nr 8 (10), s. 1401–1410, https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1553
View in Google Scholar

Wapner W., Judd T. i Gardner H. (1978), Visual agnosia in an artist, „Cortex”, nr 14 (3), s. 343–364, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80062-8
View in Google Scholar

Westheimer G. (2001), The Fourier theory of vision, „Perception”, nr 30 (5), s. 531–541, https://doi.org/10.1068/p3193
View in Google Scholar

Wynne F. (2006), I was Vermeer: The rise and fall of the twentieth century’s greatest forger, Bloomsbury Press, London [wydanie polskie: (2018), To ja byłem Vermeerem: Narodziny i upadek największego fałszerza XX wieku, Rebis, Poznań].
View in Google Scholar

Zanker J. M., Walker R. (2004), A new look at op art: Towards a simple explanation of illusory motion, „Naturwissenschaften”, nr 91 (kwiecień), s. 149–156, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0511-2
View in Google Scholar

Zeki S. (1999), Art and the brain, „Journal of Consciousness Studies”, nr 6 (6–7), s. 76–96.
View in Google Scholar

Zeki S. (2013), Clive Bell’s „Significant Form” and the neurobiology of aesthetics, „Frontiers in Human Neuroscience”, nr 7 (listopad), s. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00730
View in Google Scholar