Metakolaż: O kanonie myślenia metaforycznego

Abbate J., 1994, Analogy is destiny: The role of metaphor in defining a new technology, MEPHISTOS conference, Cambridge, MA, February, (za: Wyatt, 2004), http://www.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/internationalexeter/documents/iss/Wyatt_danger-metaphors_(3).pdf (dostęp 13.05.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Addleson M., 1998, Language of Possessing and Participation: Traps, Tropes and Trapezes of Organizational Discourse, „Proceedings of the Conference Held at the Management Centre King’s College”, s. 1–42.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Anderson M. L., 2003, Embodied Cognition: A Field Guide, „Artificial Intelligence”, 149(1), s. 91–130.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Arendt H., 1989, O myśleniu, Aletheia, Wydawnictwo Europa, Londyn, (tłum. H. Buczyńska-Garewicz).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bailer-Jones D., 2001, Models, Metaphors, and Analogies, [w:] P. Machamer, M. Silberstein (red.), Guide to the Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Blacwell Publishers, s. 108–127.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bailer-Jones D., 2009, Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press, http://digital.library.pitt.edu/cgi-bin/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=pittpress;cc=pittpress;q1=2012;rgn1=citation;idno=31735062137009;rgn=works;didno=31735062137009;view=image;seq=11;node=31735062137009%3A1;page=root;size=s;frm=frameset (dostęp 20.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Balkin J. M., 2002, (1998), Cultural Software: A theory of Ideology, Yale University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bańka J., 2008, O dwuświatowej ontologii w „Enneadach” Plotyna, „Lingua ac Communitas”, s. 115–125, http://www.lingua.amu.edu.pl/Lingua_9/BANKA.pdf (dostęp 08.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Barberousse A., Pascal L., 2009, Fictions and Models, [w:] M. Suárez (red.), Fictions in Science, Philosophical Essays on Modelling and Idealisation, London: Routledge, s. 56–75.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Barnden J. A., Wallington A. M., 2010, Metaphor and its unparalleled meaning and truth, [w:] A. Burkhardt, B. Nerlich (red.), Tropical Truths: The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes, De Gruyter, Berlin, s. 85–121.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Barnes B., Bloor D., 1993, Relatywizm, racjonalizm a socjologia wiedzy, (tłum. J. Niżnik), [w:] B. Barnes, D. Bloor, Mocny program socjologii wiedzy, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo IFIs PAN, s. 1–37.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Barnes T. J., 1997, Theories of Accumulation and Regulation: Bringing Life Back into Economic Geography Introduction to Section Three, [w:] Wills J., Lee R. (red.), Geographies of Economies, London: Arnold, s. 231–248.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Barsalou L. W., 1999, Perceptual symbol systems, „Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, 22, s. 577–666.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Barsalou L. W., 2008, Grounded cognition, „Annual Review of Psychology”, 59, s. 617–645.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bateman J., Hois J., Ross R., Tenbrink T., 2010, A Linguistic Ontology of Space for Natural Language Processing, „Artificial Intelligence”, 17(14), s. 1027–1071.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bayram F., 2010, Ideology and Political Discourse: a Critical Discourse Analysis of Erdogan’s Political Speech, „Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences”, 7, s. 23–40.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Beardsley M. C., 1958, Aesthetics, Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Beardsley M. C., 1962, The metaphorical twist, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research”, 22(3), s. 293–307, https://doi.org/10.2307/2104415.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Behe M., 1996, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, New York: Touchstone.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bell D., 1960, The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ben-Jacob E., Becker I., Shapira Y., Levine H., 2004, Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence, „Trends Microbiol” 12(8), s. 366–372.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Berdayes V., Esposito L., Murphy J. W., 2004, The Body in Human Inquiry: Interdisciplinary Explorations of Embodiment, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bergmann M., 1982, Metaphorical Assertions, „The Philosophical Review”, 91(2), s. 229–245.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bhushan B., 2012, Biomimetics Bioinspired Hierarchical-Structured Surfaces for Green Science and Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Black M., 1962a, Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Models and Metaphors, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, s. 25–47.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Black M., 1962b, Models and Archetypes, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, s. 219–243.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Black M., 1979, More about Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 19–41.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Blackburn S., 1984, Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bloor D., 1993, Wittgenstein i Mannheim o socjologii matematyki, (tłum. W. Szydłowska, Z. Jankiewicz), [w:] Silny program socjologii wiedzy, Wyd. IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Blumenberg H., 2010, Paradigms for a Metaphorology, Cornell University Press: Ithaca, New York, s. 178; (tłumacz. z niemieckiego Robert Savage), oryginał niemiecki: 1960, Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie, Suhrkamp Verlag Frankfurt am Main.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Boers F., 1999, When a Bodily Source Domain Becomes Prominent: the Joy of Counting Metaphors in the Socio-Economic Domain, [w:] R. W. Gibbs, G. Steen (red.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, s. 47–56.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bohm D., 1988, Ukryty porządek, Pusty Obłok, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bohm D., Hiley B., 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge, London.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Borbely A. F., 2008, Metaphor and Psychotherapy, [w:]: R. W. Jr. Gibbs (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 412–424.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Boroditsky L., 2000, Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors, „Cognition”, 75(1), s. 1–28.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Boroditsky L., 2001, Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time, „Cognitive Psychology”, 43(1), s. 1–22.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Boroditsky L., Ramscar M., 2002, The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought, „Psychological Science”, 13(2), s. 185–189.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bowdle B., Gentner D., 1997, Informativity and asymmetry in comparisons, „Cognitive Psychology”, 34(3), s. 244–286.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bowdle B., Gentner D., 2005, The Career of Metaphor, „Psychological Review”, 112(1), s. 193–216, http://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/gentner/papers/BowdleGentner05.pdf (dostęp 23.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Braithwaite R., 1954, The Nature of Theoretical Concepts and the Role of Models in an Advanced Science, „Revue Internationale de Philosophie”, 8(1/2), s. 34–40.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Brandl M. S., Metaphor(m) and Foundational Metaphors in Vincent van Gogh, http://www.metaphorandart.com/articles/vangoghmet.html (dostęp 08.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Breakwell G. M., 2001, Mental models and social representations of hazards: The significance of identity processes, „Journal of Risk Research”, 4, s. 341–351.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bronk R., 2009, The Romantic Economist: Imagination in Economics, Cambridge University Press, New York, zob. także Richard Bronk, Cover Interview of May 22, 2009, http://rorotoko.com/interview/20090522_bronk_richard_romantic_economist_imagination_economics/?page=4 (dostęp 12.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Brown T. L., 2003a, Making Truth: Metaphor in Science, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bunge M., 1973, Philosophy of Physics, Dordrecht: Reidel, s. 126.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Burkhardt A., 1990, Speech Acts, Meaning, and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John Searle, Berlin and New York: W. de Gruyter.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bushe G. R., 2013, Generative process, generative outcome: The transformational potential of appreciative inquiry, [w:] D. L. Cooperrider, D. P. Zandee, L. N. Godwin, M. Avital, B. Boland (red.), Organizational Generativity: The Appreciative Inquiry Summit and a Scholarship of Transformation (Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, vol. 4, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, s. 89–113.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bushman B. J., 2002, Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger and aggressive responding, „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, 28(6), s. 724–731.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Calbris G., 1990, The Semiotics of French Gestures, Bloomington, IN: IU Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Calbris G., 2003, L’expression gestuelle de la homme politique, Paris: CNRS Éditions, Collection CNRS pensée d’un Communication.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Calbris G., Porcher L., 1989, Geste et communication, Paris: Hatier-Crédif.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Caldwell J., Caldwell P., 1987, The Cultural Context of High Fertility in sub-Saharan Africa, „Population and Development Review” 13(3), s. 409–437.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Caldwell J., Caldwell P., Quiggin P., 1989, The Social Context of AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa, „Population and Development Review”, 17, s. 185–234.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Carnap R., 1938, Foundations of Logic and Mathematics, [w:] O. Neurath, C. Morris and R. Carnap (red.), International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science, vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s. 139–213.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Casasanto D., 2007, Space for Thinking, [w:] Vyvyan Evans, Paul Chilton (red.), Language, Cognition and Space: the state of the art and new directions, Equinox Publishing, London.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Charteris-Black J., 2005, (2011) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Charteris-Black J., 2004, Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Chase W. G., Simon H. A., 1973, Perception in chess, „Cognitive Psychology”, 4, s. 55–81.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Chilton P., Lakoff G., 1995, Foreign policy by metaphor, [w:] C. Schäffner, A. Wenden (red.), Language and Peace, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, s. 37–60.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Chlewiński Z., 1999, Umysł. Dynamiczna organizacja pojęć, Biblioteka Psychologii Współczesnej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Chomsky N., 2011, Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, oprac. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, Paul Portner, Walter de Gruyter, s. 466.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Cienki A., 1997, Motion in the metaphorical spaces of morality and reasoning as expressed in language and gesture, „International Journal of Communication”, 7, s. 85–98.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Cienki A., 1998, Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphorical expressions, [w:] J. P. Koenig (red.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, s. 189–204.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Cienki A., Müller C., 2008, Metaphor, gesture and thought, [w:] R. W. Gibbs Jr. (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 483–501.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Clark H. H., 1973, Space, time, semantics, and the child, [w:] T. E. Moore (red.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, New York: Academic Press, s. 27–83, (za: Boroditsky, 2000).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Clark A., 2008, Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension, New York: Oxford University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Cohen J., 1967, Psychological time in health and disease, Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Contessa G., 2010, Scientific models and fictional objects, „Synthese”, 172(2), s. 215–229, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9503-2.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Cooke N., 1999, Knowledge elicitation, [w:] F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, S. T. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, T. J. Perfect (red.), Handbook of applied cognition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, s. 479–509.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Coulehan J., 2003, Metaphor and Medicine: Narrative in Clinical Practice, „Humanities and Medicine, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 76, s. 87–95.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Cowart M., Embodied Cognition, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.iep.utm.edu/embodcog/ (dostęp 14.02.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Craik K. J. W., 1943, The nature of explanation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Csordas T., 1994, Embodiment and Experience. The existential ground for culture and self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Damasio A. R., 1999, The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness, New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Damasio A. R., 2003, Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain, New York: Hartcourt, Inc.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Danblon E., 2010, Persuasion: between trope and truth, [w:] A. Burkhardt, B. Nerlich, Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes, s. 73–84.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Davidson D., 1978, What Metaphors Mean, On Metaphor, Sacks, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s. 29–45.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Davidson D., 1992, Eseje o prawdzie, języku i umyśle, PWN, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Dawkins R., 2012, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Samolubny gen, (tłum. M. Skoneczny), Prószyński i Spółka.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Deacon T. W., 2012, Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter, Norton & Company, New York, London.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

DeLong A. J., 1981, Phenomenological space-time toward an experimental relativity, „Science”, 213, s. 681–681.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Derrida J., 1986, Biała mitologia: metafora w tekście filozoficznym, „Pamiętnik Literacki”, 77/3, s. 283–318, (tłum. W. Krzemień, według: J. Derrida, Marges de la philosophie, Paris, 1972, s. 247–324), http://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media//files/ (dostęp 07.03.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

De Vreese C., 2005, News framing: Theory and typology, „Information and Design Journal”, 13, s. 51–62.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

DeYoung D. B., Hobbs D., 2009, Discovery of Design: Searching Out the Creator’s Secrets, New Leaf Publishing Group.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Dirven R., Frank R., (red.), 2001, Language and Ideology, vol. II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Dove J. E., Everett L. A., Preece P. F., 1999, Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawings, „International Journal of Science Education”, 21, s. 485–497.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Eagleton T., 1991, Ideology. An Introduction, London–New York: Verso.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Efland A. D., 2002, Art and cognition: integrating the visual arts in the curriculum, New York: Teachers College Press, (za: D. Serig).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Eliasmith C., 2010, How We Ought to Describe Computation in the Brain, „Studies in History and Philosophy of Science”, 41, s. 313–320.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Evans V., 2004, The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fairclough N., 1989, Language and Power, London: Longman.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fairclough N., 1992, Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fauconnier G., Turner M., 1998, Conceptual integration networks, „Cognitive Science”, 22(2), s. 133–187.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fauconnier G., Turner M., 2002, The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities, New York: Basic Books.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Feldman J. A., 2006, From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language, A Bradford Book The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Feser E., (red.), 2013, Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics, Palgrave Macmillan, London, New York.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fillmore C., 1976, Topics in lexical semantics, [w:] P. Cole (red.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, s. 76–138.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fillmore C., 1982a, Frame semantics, [w:] Linguistic Society of Korea, Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Seoul: Hashin, s. 111–138.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fillmore C., 1982b, Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis, [w:] R. J. Jarvell, W. Klein (red.), Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, London: Wiley, s. 31–59.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fillmore C., 1985, Frames and the semantics of understanding, „Quaderni Di Semantica”, 6, s. 222–254.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fine A., 1993, Fictionalism, „Midwest Studies in Philosophy”, 18, s. 1–18, http://faculty.washington.edu/afine/Fictionalism.pdf (dostęp 06.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Flusberg S. J., Matlock T., Thibodeau P. H., 2017, Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change, „Environmental Communication”, 11(6), s. 769–783, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111 (dostęp 25.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fojt T., 2009, The Construction of Scienti Knowledge through Metaphor, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Forceville C., Urios-Aparisi E., 2009, Multimodal Metaphor, Walter de Gruyer.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Forster M., 2004, Theories, Models and Curves, http://philosophy.wisc.edu/forster/520/Chapter%202.pdf (dostęp 15.02.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fowler R., 1987, The Intervention of the Media in the Reproduction of Power, [w:] I. M. Zavala, T. A. Van Dijk, M. Diaz-Diocaretz, (red.), Approaches to discourse, poetics and psychiatry, Amsterdam: Benjamins, s. 67–80.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Frigg R., 2010a, Fiction in Science, [w:] John Woods (red.), Fictions and Models: New Essays, Munich: Philosophia Verlag, s. 247–287.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Frigg R., 2010b, Models and Fiction, „Synthese”, 172(2), s. 251–268.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Frigg R., Hartmann S., 2012, Models in Science, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/models-science/#OntWhaMod (dostęp 11.03.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gallistel C. R., 1993, The organization of learning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gay W. C., 1992, Ricoeur on Metaphor and Ideology, „Darshana International”, 32(1), s. 59–70, http://www.philosophy.uncc.edu/wcgay/pubricoeur.htm (dostęp 21.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Geeraerts D., Grondelaers S., 1995, Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns, [w:] J. R. Taylor, R. E. MacLaury (red.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 153–179 (za: Kövecses, 2010, s. 171).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Geertz C., 2005, Ideologia jako system kulturowy, Interpretacja kultur, (tłum. M. M. Piechaczek), Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, s. 225–267.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gentner D., 2002, Psychology of Mental models, [w:] N. J. Smelser, P. B. Bates (red.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, s. 9683–9687.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gentner D., Gentner D. R., 1983, Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity, [w:] D. Gentner, A. L. Stevens (red.), Mental models, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, s. 99–129.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gentner D., Bowdle B. F., Wolff P., Borobat C., 2001, Metaphor is like analogy, [w:] D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, B. K. Kokinov (red.), Perspectives from cognitive science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, s. 199–254.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gevaert C., 2001, Anger in Old and Middle English: a ‘hot’ topic? „Belgian Essays on Language and Literature”, s. 9–101 (za: Kövecses, 1995).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gevaert C., 2005, The ANGER IS HEAT question: Detecting cultural influence, [w:] N. Deelbecque, J. van der Auwera, D. Geeraerts (red.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 195–208.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1992, Categorization and metaphor understanding, „Psychological Review”, 99(3), s. 572–577.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1994a, The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language and understanding, Cambridge University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1994b, Figurative thought and figurative language, [w:] M. Gernsbacher (red.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, s. 411–446.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1996, Why many concepts are metaphorical, „Cognition”, s. 61, 309–319, http://psychology.illinoisstate.edu/jccutti/psych480_24/readings/gibbs1996.pdf (dostęp 23.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1999, Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world, [w:] R. W. Gibbs Jr., G. J. Steen (red.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, s. 145–166.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 2006, Embodiment and Cognitive Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 2008, The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 474.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 2011, Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory, „Discourse Processes”, 48(8), s. 529–562.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gibbs R. W. Jr., Colston H., 1995, The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 6, s. 347–378.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Giere R. N., 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s. 78–86.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Giere R. N., 2006, Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gierulanka D., 1962, Zagadnienie swoistości poznania matematycznego, PWN, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gillespie N. C., 1990, Divine Design and the Industrial Revolution: William Paley’s Abortive Reform of Natural Theology, „Isis”, 81, s. 214–229 (za: Recker).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Glenberg A. M., Robertson D. A., 2000, Symbol grounding and meaning, A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning, „Journal of Memory and Language”, 43, s. 379–401.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Glennan S., 2000, A Model of Models, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1134/1/Models1.4.pdf? (dostęp 18.02.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Glicksohn J., 2001, Temporal Cognition and the Phenomenology of Time: A Multiplicative Function for Apparent Duration, „Consciousness and Cognition”, 10(1), s. 1–25.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Glucksberg S., 2001, Understanding Figurative Language: from Metaphors to Idioms, New York: Oxford University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Glucksberg S., Haught C., 2006a, Can Florida become like the next Florida? When metaphoric comparisons fail, „Psychological Science”, 17, s. 935–938.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Glucksberg S., Haught C., 2006b, On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails, Mind and Language, 21(3), s. 360–378.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Glucksberg S., Keysar B., 1990, Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity, „Psychological Review”, 97, s. 3–18.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Goatly A., 2007, Washing Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gobet F., Clarkson G., 2004, Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four… or is it two?, „Memory”, 12, s. 732–747.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith P., 2006, The Strategy of Model-based Science, „Biology and Philosophy”, 21, s. 725–740.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith P., 2009, Models and Fictions in Science, „Philosophical Studies”, 143, s. 101–116.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gold B., 2001, ‘Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being’, http://www.maa.org/reviews/wheremath.html (dostęp 04.05.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Goodman N., 1976, Languages of Art: An Approach to A theory of Symbols, (2 wydanie) Indianopolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gould S. J., Vrba E. S., 1982, Exaptation-A Missing Term in the Science of Form, „Paleobiology”, 8(1), s. 4–15, http://www2.hawaii.edu/~khayes/Journal_Club/fall2006/Gould_&_Vrb_1982_Paleobio.pdf (dostęp 05.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Grady J., 1997a, Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes, University of California at Berkeley (unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Grady J., 1997b, THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 8(4), s. 267– 290, https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Grady J., 1999, A typology for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance, [w:] R. W. Gibbs, G. Steen (red.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins, s. 79–100.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Grady J., 2005, Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 37, s. 1595–1614, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Grice P., 1975, Logic and conversation, [w:] P. Cole, J. L. Morgan (red.), Syntax and semantics, 5(3), New York: Academic Press, s. 41–58; (tłumaczenie polskie: Logika i konwersacja, 1977, „Przegląd Humanistyczny”, 6, s. 85–99 oraz 1980, [w:] B. Stanosz (red.), Język w świetle nauki, Czytelnik, Warszawa, s. 91–114), http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Griesemer J., 1990, Modeling in the Museum: On the Role of Remnant Models, „Biology and Philosophy”, 5, s. 3–36.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Groseclose T., Milyo J., 2005, A Measure of Media Bias, „The Quaterly Journal of Ecnomics”, 120(4), s. 1191–1237.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gruber J., 1965, Studies in Lexical Relations, MIT, Cambridge.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Haglund J., 2013, Collaborative and self-generated analogies in science education, „Studies in Science Education”, 49(1), s. 35–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.801119 http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:621708/FULLTEXT01.pdf (dostęp 13.06. 18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hall R. I., Aitchison P. W., Kocay W. L., 1994, Causal policy maps of managers: formal methods for elicitation and analysis, „Systems Dynamics Review”, 10, s. 337–360.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hawk O., Johnsrude J., Pulvermüller F., 2004, Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex, „Neuron”, 41(2), s. 301–307.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hawking S., Mlodinow L., 2010, The Grand Design, New York: Bantam Books.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hedblom M. M., Kutz O., Neuhaus F., 2016, Image schemas in computational conceptual blending, „Cognitive Systems Research”, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys (dostęp 12.01.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hefferman P., 1976, Jobs for the Environment: The Coming Green Collar Revolution, [w:] Jobs and Prices in the West Coast Region: Hearing before the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Heisenberg W., 1970, Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science, Harper & Row, Fizyka a filozofia, (tłum. S. Amsterdamski), http://filozofiauw.wdfiles.com/local--fi.%20C%20-%20Fizyka%20a%20fi zofia.pdf (dostęp 02.03.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hellingwerf K. J., 2005, Bacterial observations: a rudimentary form of intelligence? „Trends Microbiol”, 13(4), s. 152–158.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Helmreich S., 2011, What is Life? Answers from Three Limit Biologies, Critical „Inquiry”, 37, University of Chicago, s. 671– 696.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hempel C. G., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Free Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Henderson D. W., 2002, Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being, „The Mathematical Intelligencer”, 24(1), s. 75–76.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Henderson W., 1982, Metaphor in economics, „Economics”, 18, s. 147–157.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hesse M. B., 1953, Models in Physics, „British Journal for the Philosophy of Science”, 4, s. 198–214.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hesse M. B., 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame, Ind. University of Notre Dame Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Heßler M., 2006, (red.), Konstruierte Sichtbarkeiten. Wissenschafts und Technikbilder seit der Frühen Neuzeit, Verlagsort: München.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Higgins E. T., 1996, Knowledge Activation: Accessibility, Applicability, and Salience, [w:] E. T. Higgins, A. Kruglansky (red.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, New York: Guilford Presss, s. 133–168.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Himma K. E., 2005, The Application-Conditions for Design Inferences: Why the Design Arguments Need the Help of Other Arguments for God’s Existence, „International Journal for Philosophy of Religion”, 57, s. 1–33 (za: Recker).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hinman L. M., 1982, Nietzsche, Metaphor, and Truth, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research”, 43(2), s. 179–199.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hintzman D. L., 1986, Schema Abstraction’ in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model, „Psychological Review”, 93, s. 328–338.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hiraga M., 1991, Metaphors Japanese women live by, „Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism” 1(1), s. 38–57, (AILA Commission on Language and Gender).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hodgkinson G. P., Maule A. J., Brown N., 2004, Causal cognitive mapping in the organizational strategy field: A comparison of alternative elicitation procedures, „Organizational Research Methods”, 7, s. 3–26.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hofstadter D. R., 2001, Epilogue: Analogy as the Core of Cognition, [w:] D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, B. K. Kokinov (red.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, s. 499–539.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hofstadter D. R., 2013, The nature of categories and concepts, Stanford Symbolic Systems Distinguished Speaker Lecture (opublikowany 07.03.2014), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr3QDMkMGmQ&list=RDKr3QDMkMGmQ#t=4341 (dostęp 21.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Holyoak K. J., Thagard P., 1995, Mental Leaps, Analogy in Creative Thought. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Horgan J., 1999, Koniec nauki, czyli o granicach wiedzy schyłku ery naukowej, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Humphreys P., 2002, Computational Models, „Philosophy of Science”, 69, s. 1–11. Hutcheon P. D., 2012, A Critique of ‘Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA’ http://www.humanists.net/pdhutcheon/humanist%20articles/lewontn.htm (dostęp 08.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

James W., 1890, Principles of Psychology, vol. I, London: Macmillan.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

James W., 1974, Pragmatism and Four Essays from The Meaning of Truth, New American Library, New York, reprint: Pragmatism (1907) oraz The Meaning of Truth (1909); (tłum. W. N. Kozłowski), Pragmatyzm. Kraków, vis-a-vis/Etiuda, 2016, Znaczenie prawdy, (tłum. Michał Szczubiałka), Warszawa: KR, 2000.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Johanson M., Papafragou A., 2014, What does children’s spatial language reveal about spatial concepts? Evidence from the use of containment expressions, „Cognitive Science”, 38(5), s. 881–910.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Johnson M., 1987, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Johnson M., 2007, The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Johnson P. E., 1991, Darwin on Trial, Washington DC: Regnery Gateway Publishing Company, 1991, http://www.maxddl.org/Creation/Darwin%20On%20Trial.pdf (dostęp 14.05.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird P. N., 2004, The history of mental models, [w:] K. Manktelow, M. C. Chun (red.), Psychology of Reasoning: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives, New York: Psychology Press, s. 179–212. http://mentalmodels.princeton.edu/papers/2005HistoryMentalModels.pdf (2005) (dostęp 15.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird P. N., 2005, Mental models in thought, [w:] K. Holyoak, R. J. Sternberg (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, s. 179–212.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird P. N., 2010, Mental models and human reasoning, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1012933107 (dostęp 14.02.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Jones N. A., Ross H., Lynam T., Perez P., Leitch A., 2011, Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Method, „Ecology and Society”, 16(1), art. 46, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/ (dostęp 13.05.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kampis G., 1991, Self-modifying systems in biology and cognitive science. A New Framework for Dynamics, Information and Complexity, Pergamon Press, Oxford (za: Marques i Brito, s. 81).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kauffman S. A., 2000, Investigations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Keller E. F., 1995, Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth century Biology, Columbia University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kelley R. E., 1985, The Gold-Collar Worker: Harnessing the Brainpower of the New Work Force, Reading, MASS: Addison-Wesley.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kelling G., 1991, Crime and Metaphor: Towards a New Concept of Policing, „City Journal” 1, www.city-journal.org/html/issue1 (dostęp 08.05.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kendall J. E., Kendall K. E., 1993, Metaphors and Methodologies: Living Beyond The System Machine, „MIS (Management Information System) Quarterly”, 17(2), s. 149–171.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kintsch W., 2000, Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory, „Psychonomic Bulletin & Review”, 7, s. 257–266.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kittay E. F., Lehrer, A., 1981, Semantic fields and the structure of metaphor, „Studies in Language”, 5, 31–63, https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.5.1.03kit.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Klamer A., Leonard T. C., 1994, So what’s an economic metaphor?, [w:] P. Mirowski (red.), Natural Images in Economic Thought: Markets Read in Tooth and Claw, Cambridge University Press, s. 20–52, https://www.princeton.edu/~tleonard/papers/metaphor.pdf (dostęp 06.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kleider H. M., Pezdek K., Goldinger S. D., Kirk A., 2008, Schema-driven source misattribution errors: Remembering the expected from a witnessed event, „Applied Cognitive Psychology”, 22(1), s. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1361.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Klein G., 1998, Sources of Power, How People Make Decisions, MIT Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Knuuttila T., Loettgers A., 2012, The productive tension, [w:] P. Humphreys, C. Imbert, (red.), Models, Simulations and Representations, London: Routledge.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Knuuttila T., 2009, Isolating Representations vs. Credible Constructions?, „Erkenntnis”, 70, s. 59–80.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Knuuttila T., 2011, Modelling and Representing, „Studies in History and Philosophy of Science”, 42, s. 262–271.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Koestler A., 1964, The Act of Creation, London: Hutchinson & Co. (przedruk: Penguin Books: Arcana, 1989).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Koller V., 2004, Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kövecses Z., 1995, Anger: Its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural evidence, [w:] J. R. Taylor, R. E. MacLaury (red.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 79–92.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kövecses Z., 2000, Metaphor and Emotion, Cambridge University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kövecses Z., 2005, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation, New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kövesces Z., 2006, Language, Mind and Culture, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Krąpiec M. A., 1993, Teoria analogii bytu, Dzieła, t. I, Lublin, s. 315.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kuhn T., 1979, Metaphor in Science, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss, s. 409–419.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kuhn W., 2002, Modeling the semantics of geographic categories through conceptual integration, International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, s. 108–118.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kuhn W., 2007, An Image-Schematic Account of Spacial Categories, [w:] S. Winter, M. Duckham, L. Kulik, B. Kuipers (red.), Spatial Information Theory, vol. 4736, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer, s. 152–168.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kuorikoski J., Lehtinen A., Marchionni C., 2010, Economic modelling as robustness analysis, „British Journal for the Philosophy of Science”, 61, s. 541–567.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kuypers J. A., 1997, Agenda-setting, Agenda-Extension, and Framing Analysis, [w:] J. A. Kuypers, Presidential Crisis Rhetoric and the Press in the Post-cold War World, Greenwood Publishing Group.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kuypers J. A., 2006, Bush’s War: Media Bias and Justifications for War in a Terrorist Age, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 1987, Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 1990, The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schema?, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 1(1), s. 39–74, https://georgelakoff.files.wordpress. com/2014/11/invariance-hypothesis-lakoff-1990.pdf (dostęp 23.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 1990, The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 1(1), s. 39–74.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 1993, The contemporary theory of metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and thought (wydanie drugie), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, s. 202–215.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 1993, The contemporary theory of metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought (wydanie drugie), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, s. 202–251.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 1995, Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, Or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust, „Social Research”, 62(2), s. 177–214.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 1996, Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, University of Chicago Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 2004 (2008), Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: the Essential Guide for Progressives, Chelsea Green Publishing.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 2008, The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain, New York, NY: Penguin Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1980, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Metafory w naszym życiu, (tłum. T. Krzeszowski), Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1988.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Turner M., 1989, More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to poetic Metaphor, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1999, Philosophy In the Flesh: The Embodied Mind And Its Challenge To Western Thought, New York, NY: Basic Books.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Núñez R., 2000, Where Mathematics Comes From. How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being, New York: Basic Books.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Espenson J., Schwartz A., 1991, Master metaphor list, second draft copy, http://araw.mede.uic.edu/~alansz/metaphor/METAPHORLIST.pdf (dostęp 25.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Landau M. J., Sullivan D., Greenberg J., 2009, Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes, „Psychological Science”, 20, s. 1421–1427, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2009.02462.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lapin S., 1981, Sorts, Ontology, and Metaphor, Berlin and New York: Waiter de Gruyter. LeDoux J., 2002, Synaptic self, New York: Penguin.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Leng M., 2010, Mathematics and Reality, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Leśmian B., 1983, W malinowym chruśniaku, Poezje wybrane, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław–Warszawa, s. 92.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Levins R., 1966, The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology, „American Scientist”, 54, s. 421–431.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss C., 1962, La Pensée sauvage, Paris: Plon, Myśl nieoswojona, (tłum. A. Zajączkowski), 1969, PWN.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lewontin R. C., 1991, The doctrine of DNA: Biology as ideology, New York: Harper Perennial.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lewontin R. C., 2004, Gene, Organism and Environment: Bad Metaphors and Good Biology with UC Berkeley Graduate Lectures, http://www.uctv.tv/shows/Gene-Organism-and-Environment-Bad-Metaphors-and-Good-Biology-with-Richard-Lewontin-8393 (dostęp 17.01.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lima P. L. C., 2006, About primary metaphor, „Delta”, 22, s. 109–122, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502006000300009.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Linden A., 2008, Mindworks: An introduction to NLP, Crown House Publishing.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Llewellyn Karl N., 1930, A Realistic Jurisprudence – The New Step, „Columbia Law Review”, 30(4), s. 431–46.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Locke J., 1690, Rozważania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego, Księga III, rozdz. 3, art. 15; za: Encyklopedia Stanford http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sortals/ (dostęp 05.03.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lovelock J., 1991, Gaia, The practical science of planetary medicine, London: Gaia Books.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lovelock J., 1995, The ages of Gaia, (wydanie drugie), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lowe T. D., Lorenzoni I., 2007, Danger is all around: eliciting expert perceptions for managing climate change through a mental models approach, „Global Environmental Change”, 17, s. 131–146.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lyon P., 2015, The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered, „Frontiers in Microbiology”, 6, s. 264, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00264, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396460/ (dostęp 28.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Maalej Z. A., Yu N., 2011, Embodiment Via Body Parts: Studies from Various Languages and Cultures, John Benjamins Publishing.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

MacCormac E., 1985, A cognitive theory of metaphor, Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Machamer P., 2000, The Nature of Metaphor and Scientific Description, [w:] F. Hallyn (red.), Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, s. 35–52.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mackie J. L., 1982, The Miracle of Theism: Arguments For and Against the Existence of God, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (za: Recker).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

MacWhinney B., 2008, How mental models encode embodied linguistic perspectives, [w:] R. Klatzky, B. MacWhinney, M. Behrmann (red.), Embodied cognition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, s. 365–405.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Madsen M. W., 2016, Cognitive Metaphor Theory and the Metaphysics of Immediacy, „Cognitive Science”, 40, s. 881–908.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mandler J. M., 1992, How to build a baby: Conceptual primitives, „Psychological Review”, 99(4), s. 587–604.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mandler J. M., 2008, On the Birth and Growth of Concepts, „Philosophical Psychology”, 21(2), s. 207–230.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mandler J. M., Canovas C. P., 2014, On defining image schemas, „Language and Cognition”, 6(4), s. 510–532.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Marciszewski W., 1994, Sztuka rozumowania w świetle logiki, Aleph, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Marcus H., Zajonc R. B., 1985, The Cognitive Perspective in Social Psychology, [w:] G. Lindzey, E. Aronson (red.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, (wydanie trzecie), New York: Random House, s. 137–229.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Margulis L., Sagan D., 1995, What is Life?, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Marijuán P. C., Navarro J., del Moral R., 2010, On prokaryotic intelligence: strategie for sensing the environment, „Biosystems”, 92(2), 94–103.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Markman A. B., Dietrich E., 2000, Extending the classical view of representation, „Trends in Cognitive Science”, 4, s. 470–475.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Marques V., Brito C., 2014, The Rise and Fall of the Machine Metaphor: Organizational Similarities and Differences between Machines and Living Beings, „Verifichte”, 43(1/3), s. 77–111.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Martinich A. P., 1984, A Theory for Metaphor, „Journal of Literary Semantics”, 13, s. 34–56, https://www.msu.edu/~orourk51/360-Phil/Spring2015/Readings/Martinich.pdf (dostęp 31.03.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Matlock T., Coe C., Westerling L., 2017, Monster wildfires and metaphor, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 32(4), s. 250–261.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Maturana H. R., Varela F. J., 1980, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (1991, 2012), Springer Science & Business Media Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing., 2012, seria: „Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science”, t. 42.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mayr E., 1985, How biology differs from the physical sciences, [w:] D. J. Depew, B. H. Weber (red.), Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 43–63.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mayr E., 2004, What Makes Biology Unique, Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline, Rozdział 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 39–66.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mazodier P., Davies J., 1991, Gene Transfer between Distantly related Bacteria, „Annual Review of Genetics”, 25, s. 147–171, http://web.mit.edu/kdrinkwa/Public/tklab/for-mfpapers/Mazodier91.pdf (dostęp 05.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

McCloskey D. N., 1986, The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

McGlone M. S., 2011, Hyperbole, homunculi and hindsight bias: An alternative evaluation of conceptual metaphor theory, „Discourse Processes”, 48(8), s. 563–574.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

McNeill D., Duncan S., 2000, Growth Points in Thinking-for-Speaking, [w:] D. McNeill (red.), Language and Gesture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 141–161.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

McNeill D., Cassell J., Levy E. T., 1993, Abstract deixis, „Semiotica”, 95, s. 5–19.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

McRae K., Jones M., 2013, Semantic Memory, [w:] D. Reisberg (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, s. 206–216.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty M., 1945, Phénoménologie de la perception, Paris: Gallimard, Fenomenologia percepcji, (tłum. M. Kowalska, J. Migasiński), Warszawa, Aletheia, 2016.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Miller G. A., 1956, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information, „Psychological Review”, 63(2), s. 81–97.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Morgan M. G., Fischhoff B., Bostrom A., Atman C., 2002, Risk communication: a mental models approach, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Moss L., 2004, What Genes Can’t Do, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mossio M., Moreno A., 2010, Organisational Closure in Biological Organisms, „History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences”, 54(32), s. 269–288.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Müller C., 1998, Iconicity and gesture, [w:] S. Santi et al. (red.), Oralité et Gestualité: Communication Multimodale, Interaction, Montréal, Paris: L’Harmattan, s. 321–328.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Müller C., 2004, Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? [w:] C. Müller, R. Posner (red.), The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, Berlin: Weidler, s. 233 –256.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Murdock. B. B., Jr., 1974, Human memory: Theory and data, Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbclum Associates.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Murphy G. I., 2002, The Big Book of Concepts, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Musolff A., 2004, Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogic Reasoning in Debates about Europe, New York: Palgrave.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Nagel E., 1961, The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Struktura nauki, zagadnienia logiki wyjaśnień naukowych, (tłum. J. Giedymin, B. Rassalski, H. Eilstein), 1970, PWN.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Negro A. I., 2011, Metaphor and ideology in the business press: The case of the Endesa take over, „Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies”, 43, s. 73–85.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Neisser U., 1967, Cognitive Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Neisser U., 1976, Cognition and Reality, Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Nersessian N. J., 2002, The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science, [w:] P. Carruthers, S. Stich, M. Siegal, (red.), The cognitive basis of science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, s. 133–153.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Nicholson D. J., 2013, Organisms Machines, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(4), s. 669–678, http://www.academia.edu/3448382/Organisms_Machines (dostęp 15.02.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Nietzsche F., 2004, Przedstawienie retoryki antycznej, Pisma pozostałe, Kraków.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Noë A., 2004, Action in Perception, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Nosofsky R. M., 1986, Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: General”, 115(1), s. 39–57.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Núñez R. E., Sweetser E., 2006, With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time, „Cognitive Science”, 30, s. 401–450, http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~nunez/web/FINALpblshd.pdf (dostęp 30.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

O’Mara Shimek M., Guillen-Para M., Ortega-Larrea A., 2015, Stop the bleeding or weather the storm? Crisis solution marketing and the ideological use of metaphor in online financial reporting of the stock market crash of 2008 at the New York Stock Exchange, „Discourse & Communication”, 9(1), s. 103–123.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Oakley T., 2007, Image schema, [w:] D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford University Press, s. 214–235.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Odenbaugh J., 2003, Complex Systems, Trade-Offs, and Theoretical population Biology, „Philosophy of Science”, 70, s. 1496–1507.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ortiz M. J., 2010, Primary metaphors and monomodal visual metaphors, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 43(6), s. 1568–1580, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.003.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ornstein R., 1969, On the experience of Time, Hammondsworth: Penguin.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ortony A., 1993, Metaphor, language and thought, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 1–16, (wyd. drugie), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.003 (dostęp 25.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Orzack S., Sober E., 1993, A Critical Assessment of Levins’s ‘The Strategy of Model Building (1966)’, „Quarterly Review of Biology”, 68, s. 534–546.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Osborne R. J., Cosgrove M. M., 1983, Children’s conceptions of the changes of the state of water, „Journal of Research in Science Teaching”, 20, s. 825–838.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Overton W. F., Müller U., Newman J. L., 2008, Developmental Perspectives on Embodiment and Consciousness, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Paley W., [1802] 1809, Natural Theology, or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity. Collected from the Appearances of Nature, [w:] G. W. Meadley (red.), The Works of William Paley, t. 1, (za: Recker, s. 648–649).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Papafragou A., Massey C., Gleitman L., 2002, Shake, rattle ‘n’ roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition, „Cognition”, 84, s. 189–219.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pattee H. H., 1971, Physical theories of biological co-ordinatio, „Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics”, 4(2/3), s. 255–276, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/quarterly-reviews-of-biophysics/article/physical-theories-of-biological-co-ordination/75476C2 D9241B0ED0670DD84811505C6 (dostęp 07.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Payne B. K., Gawronski B., 2010, A History of Implicit Social Cognition: Where Is It Coming From? Where Is It Now? Where Is It Going? [w:] B. Gawronski, B. K. Payne (red.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press, s. 1–15.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Peirce C. S., 1906, Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmatism, „The Monist”, 16(4), s. 492–546, https://archive.org/details/jstor-27899680 (dostęp 12.02.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Peirce C. S., 1997, Wybór pism semiotycznych, (tłum. R. Mirek, A. Nowak), Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Penson R. T., Schapira L., Daniels J., Lynch T. J., Cancer as Metaphor, „The Oncologist”, (6), s. 708–716, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8165170_Cancer_as_Metaphor (dostęp 25.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pepper S., 1942, World Hypotheses, Berkeley: University of California Press, (za: Klamer, Leaonard).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Percy E. J., Hoffmann J. L., Sherman S. J., 2011, Sticky Metaphors and the Persistence of the Traditional Voluntary Manslaughter Doctrine, „Journal of Law Reform”, 44(2), s. 383–427.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pinker S., 1994, The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind, London: Penguin.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pinker S., 1997, How the mind works, New York: Norton.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pinker S., 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, Penguin, New York.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pinker S., 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, New York: Penguin Group Viking Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Plutynski A., 2001, Modeling Evolution in Theory and Practice, „Philosophy of Science”, 68, s. 225–236.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pogonowski J., 2011, Geneza matematyki wedle kognitywistów, „Investigationes Linguisticae”, 23, s. 106–147, http://inveling.amu.edu.pl/ http://www.logic.amu.edu.pl/images/3/3c/Littlejill01.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pogonowski J., 2012, Matematyczne metafory kognitywistów, http://www.logic.amu.edu.pl/images/0/0e/M„mk2012.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pogonowski J., Wrocław, 2013, Matematyczne fantazje kognitywistów, http://logic.amu.edu.pl/images/3/32/Mfk2013.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Portides D. P., 2008, Models, [w:] S. Psillos, M. Curd (red.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, New York: Routledge, s. 383–395.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Priest G., Routley R., 1989, The History of Paraconsistent Logic, [w:] G. Priest, R. Routley, J. Norman, Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, München: Philosophia Verlag, Rozdział 1.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pulaczewska H., 1999, Aspects of metaphor in physics: Examples and case studies, Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Putnam H., 1975, The Meaning of ‘Meaning’, „Language, mind, and knowledge. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science”, t. 7, s. 131–193.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Quine W., 1953, On What There Is, [w:] From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, O tym, co istnieje, [w:] Z punktu widzenia logiki, (tłum. B. Stanosz), PWN, Warszawa, 1969.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Quine W., 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge MA: MIT Press; Słowo i przedmiot (tłum. C. Cieśliński), Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia, 1999.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Raerinne J., 2013, Robustness and sensitivity of biological models, Philosophical Studies, 166(2), s. 285–303.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ramsey W., 2007, Representation Reconsidered, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Recker D., 2010, How to Confuse Organisms with Mousetraps: Machine Metaphors and Intelligent Design, The Design Metaphor, „Zygon”, 45(3), s. 647–664, doi/10.1111/j. 1467-9744.2010.01119.x/pdf www.zygonjournal.org (dostęp 12.03.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Reddy J. M., 1979, The Conduit Metaphor – A case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 284–310.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Reid J. N., Katz A. N., 2018, Something false about conceptual metaphors, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 33(1), s. 36–47.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Richards I. A., 1936, The Philosophy of Rhetoric, Oxford University Press, London, New York.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ricoeur P., 1975, La métaphore vive, Paris: Seuil; The Rule of Metaphor; Multi-Disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Root-Bernstein R. S., Root-Bernstein M., 2003, Innovative Tools for Innovative Thinking, [w:] L. V. Shavinina (red.), International Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Elsevier Science, s. 377–387.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rorty R., 1995, Filozofia jako nauka, jako metafora i jako polityka, [w:] A. Szahaj (red.), Między pragmatyzmem a postmodernizmem, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, s. 13–36.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rorty R., 2003, Zmierzch prawdy ostatecznej i narodziny kultury literackiej, (tłum. A. Szahaj), „Teksty Drugie”, 6, s. 113–130.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rosaldo M. Z., 1980, Knowledge and passion. Ilongot notions of self and social life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (za: Kövecses, 2010, s. 171).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rosch E., 1978, Principles of categorization, [w:] E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd (red.), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, s. 27–48.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rosen R., 1991, Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into Nature, Origin and Fabrication of Life, Columbia University Press, New York.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza F. J., 1998, On the nature of blending as cognitive phenomenon, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 30(3), s. 259–274.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rumelhart D. E., Abrahamson A. A., 1973, A model for analogical reasoning, „Cognitive Psychology”, 5, s. 1–28.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rybarkiewicz D., 1997, Three Aspects of Metaphor, „Logica Trianguli”, 1, s. 93–103.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rybarkiewicz D., 1998, The Structure of Metaphor: Towards a Pragmatic Approach, „Logica Trianguli”, 2, s. 103–115.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rybarkiewicz D., 2002, Is Metaphor an Illocutionary Act?, „Bulletin of the Section of Logic”, 31(1), s. 47–57.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rybarkiewicz D., 2015a, Out of the box thinking, [w:] P. Łukowski, A. Gemel, B. Żukowski (red.), Cognition, Meaning, and Action: Lodz – Lund Studies in Cognitive Science, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, Kraków, s. 152–167.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rybarkiewicz D., 2015b, Rozumowanie metaforyczne, czyli ‘metaforą po oczach’, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Iuridica”, 75, s. 207–225.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rybarkiewicz D., 2017, Metafora w działaniu, Wydawnictwo Uniwerstetu Łódzkiego.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ryle G. 1970 (1949), Czym jest umysł, (tłum. W. Marciszewski) PWN, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Samarapungavan A., Vosniaudou S., Brewe W. F., 1996, Mental models of the earth, sun and moon, „Cognitive Development”, 11, s. 491–521.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Schmidt S. R., 2012, Extraordinary Memories for Exceptional Events, Psychology Press: Taylor & Francis Group, New York, London.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Schneider S. H., 1997, Laboratory Earth: The planetary gamble we can’t afford to lose, New York: Basic Books.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Schön D. A., 1993 [1979], Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought (wyd. drugie) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Mass., s. 137–163.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Searle J. R., 1980, Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 92–124.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Shackle G. L. S., 1965, A scheme of economic theory, London, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Shanks N., 2004, God, the Devil, and Darwin: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (za: Recker).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Shapir L., 2011, Embodied cognition, New York: Routledge.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Shapiro L., 2004, The Mind Incarnate, Cambridge, MA, and London, UK: The MIT Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Shapiro L., 2010, Embodied cognition, [w:] E. Margolis, R. Samuels, S. Stich (red.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Sharifan F., Driven R., Yu N., Niemeier S., 2008, Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Sheldrake R., 1988, The Presence of the Past: morphic resonance and the habits of nature, New York, NY: Times Books.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Silaski N., 2012, Metaphors and ideology: Gendered metaphors in economic discourse, „Versita”, https://doi.org/10.2478/V10320–012–0019–4.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Sinha C., Jensen de López K., 2000, Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 11(1/2), s. 17–41.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Sober E., 2000, Philosophy of Biology, (wydanie drugie), Boulder, Colo.: Westview, (za: Recker).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Soreanu R., 2010, Metaphor in the Social Sciences: Creative Methodologies and Some Elements for an Epistemological Reconstruction, „Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Sociologia”, 55(1), s. 239–254.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Sowa J., 1984, Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine, Boston: Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., s. 4.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Sperber D., Wilson D., 1986, Relevance, Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Sterman J. D., 2000, Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Stillwagon E., 2012, The Background to Behavior Modification Strategies for Fighting Aids in Africa, [w:] K. Anyidoho, H. Lauer (red.), Reclaiming the Human Sciences and Humanities Through African Perspectives, vol. 2, Sub-Saharan Publishers Accra, Ghana, s. 997–1016.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Strawson P. F., 1980, Indywidua: Próba metafizyki opisowej, PAX, Warszawa, (tłum. B. Chwedeńczuk), Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics [1959].
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Suppe F., 1989, The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Suppes P., 1960, A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences, „Synthese”, 12(2/3), s. 287–300.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Swan J., Newell S., 1998, Making sense of the technological innovation: The political and social dynamics of cognition, [w:] C. Eden, J. C. Spencer (red.), Managerial and organizational cognition, Sage Publications, London, UK, s. 108–129.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Sypnowich C., 2014, Law and Ideology, [w:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/law-ideology/ (dostęp 12.05.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Taverniers M., 2002, Metaphor and Metaphorology: A Selective Genealogy of Philosophical and Linguistic Conceptions of Metaphor from Aristotle to the 1990s, Gent, Academia Press, Studia Germanica Candensia.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Tendahl M., 2009, A hybrid theory of metaphor: Relevance theory and cognitive linguistics, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Thagard P., 2005, Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science (wydanie drugie), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Thagard T., Toombs E., 2005, Atoms, categorization and conceptual change, [w:] H. Cohen, C. Lefebvre (red.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, Elsevier Science B. v, s. 243–254.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Thelen E., Smith, L., 1994, A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Thibodeau P. H., Durgin F. H., 2011, Metaphor aptness and conventionality: A processing fluency account, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 26, s. 206–226.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Thibodeau P., Boroditsky L., 2011, Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning, „Plos One”, 6(2), E16782, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 oraz http://lera.ucsd.edu/papers/crime-metaphors.pdf (dostęp 02.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Thompson E., 2007, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Thompson J. B., 1990, Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass, Communication Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Tinbergen N., 1963, On the aims and methods of ethology, „Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie”, 20, s. 410-163.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Tomasz z Akwinu, Komentarz do Sentencyj; cyt. za: M. A. Krąpiec, Teoria analogii bytu, Dzieła, t. I, Lublin, 1993, s. 315.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Tonneau F., 2011/2012, Metaphor and Truth: A Review of Representation Reconsidered by W. M. Ramsey, „Behavior and Philosophy”, 39/40, s. 331–343.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Toon A., 2010, Models as Make-Believe, [w:] R. Frigg, M. Hunter (red.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Springer, s. 71–96.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Turbayne C. M., 1970, The Myth of Metaphor, Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Tversky A., 1977, Features of Similarity, „Psychological Review”, 84, s. 327–352.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Valenzuela J., 2009, What empirical work can tell us about Primary Metaphors, „Quaderns de Filologia Estudis Linguistics”, 14, s. 235–249.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Van Benthem J., Minica S., 2012, Toward a Dynamic Logic of Questions, „Journal of Philosophical Logic”, 41, s. 633–669, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-012-9233-7.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Van Dijk T. A.,1998, Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London: SAGE.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Van Fraassen B. C., 1980, The Scientific Image, The Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Vanderveken D., 1985, Non-literal Speech Acts, „Cahiers d’Epistemologie”, Universite de Quebec, Montreal.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Vanderveken D., 1990, Meaning and Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Varela F., 1979, Principles of biological autonomy, Elsevier North Holland, New York.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Varela F., Thompson E., Rosch E., 1991, The Embodied Mind: Cognitive science and human Experience, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Vico G., 1966, Nauka nowa, (tłum. J. Jakubowicz), oprac. S. Krzemień-Ojak, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Voorhees B., 2004, Embodied Mathematics, „Journal of Consciousness Studies”, 11(9), s. 83–88.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Vosgerau G., 2006, The Perceptual Nature of Mental Models, [w:] C. Held, M. Knauff, G. Vosgerau (red.), Mental Models and the Mind, Oxford: Elsevier B. V, s. 255–275, https://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/fileadmin/Redaktion/Institute/Philosophie/Theoretische_Philosophie/Vosgerau/MM_vosgerau.pdf (dostęp 15.02.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Vosniaudou S., Brewer W. F., 1992, Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood, „Cognitive Psychology”, 24, s. 535–585.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Walton K. L., 1990, Mimesis as Make-believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Watkins K. W., 1989, Chemical metaphors, „Journal of Chemistry Education”, 66(12), 1020 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed066p1020.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Weisberg M., 2013, Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World, Oxford University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Weiss G., Haber H. F., 1999, Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersection of Nature and Culture, Routledge.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wen L., Weaver J. C., Lauder G. V., 2014, Biomimetic shark skin: design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function, „Journal of Experimental Biology”, 217, s. 1656–1666, https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.097097 http://jeb.biologists.org/content/217/10/1656 (dostęp 07.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wertheimer M., 1958, Principles of perceptual organization, [w:] D. C. Beardslee, M. Wertheimer (red.), Readings in perception, Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, s. 115–135, (za: M. J. Ortiz, 2010, Visual Rhetoric: Primary Metaphors and Symmetric Object Alignment, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 25(3), s. 162–180).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wheeler M., 2005, Reconstructing the Cognitive World, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Whorf B. L., 1956 [1940], Science and Linguistics, „Technology Review”, 42, s. 229–231. (Nauka a językoznawstwo. Fragmenty trzech tekstów ogłoszonych w latach 1940– 1941 na łamach „Technology Review”, w przekładzie Teresy Hołówki), http://www.sady.up.krakow.pl/antfil.whorf.htm (dostęp 05.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wiggins D., 1967, Identity and Spatio-Temporal Continuity, Oxford, B. H. Blackwell.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wilson D., Carston R., 2006, Metaphor, Relevance and the ‘Emergent Property’ Issue, „Mind & Language”, 21(3), s. 404–433.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wilson D., Carston R., 2007, A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts, [w:] N. Burton-Roberts (red.), Pragmatics, (Palgrave Advances in Linguistics), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 230–260.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wilson M., 2002, Six views of embodied cognition, „Psychonomic Bulletin and Review”, 9, s. 625–636.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Winner E., 1988, The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Woleński J., 2005, Epistemologia, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wong R., 2013, The Fiction of the Science (Future of StoryTelling), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvgdKfWnYCg (dostęp 11.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wyatt S., 2004, Danger! Metaphors at work in Economics, Geophysiology, and the Internet, „Science, Technologies, & Human Values”, 29(2), s. 242–261, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903261947.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wygotski L. S., 2002, Wybrane prace psychologiczne II. Dzieciństwo i dorastanie, Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Zajonc R. B., 1985, Emotion and facial efference: A theory reclaimed, „Science”, 228, s. 15–21.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Zakay D., Block R. A., 1997, Temporal cognition, „Current Directions in Psychological Science”, 6, s. 12–16.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Załazińska A., 2001, Schematy myśli wyrażane w gestach, Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Zeidler P., 2013, Models and Metaphors as Research Tools in Science, LIT Verlag Münster, (Series: Development in Humanities, vol. 10).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Zemach E., 1994., Metaphors and ways of life, [w:] J. Hintikka (red.), Aspects of Metaphor, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, Netherlands, s. 243–254.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ziemke T., 2003, What is that thing called embodiment?, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.529.2280&rep=rep1&type=pdf (dostęp 12.04.18).
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ziemke T., Frank R. M., 2007, Introduction: The body eclectic, [w:] T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev, I. R. M. Frank (red.), Body, Language and Mind. vol. 1: Embodiment, Berlin, New York: Mouton dr Gruyter, s. 1–13.
Zobacz w Google Scholar