Metakolaż

Abbate J., 1994, Analogy is destiny: The role of metaphor in defining a new technology, MEPHISTOS conference, Cambridge, MA, February, (za: Wyatt, 2004), http://www.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/internationalexeter/documents/iss/Wyatt_danger-metaphors_(3).pdf (dostęp 13.05.18).

Addleson M., 1998, Language of Possessing and Participation: Traps, Tropes and Trapezes of Organizational Discourse, „Proceedings of the Conference Held at the Management Centre King’s College”, s. 1–42.

Anderson M. L., 2003, Embodied Cognition: A Field Guide, „Artificial Intelligence”, 149(1), s. 91–130.

Arendt H., 1989, O myśleniu, Aletheia, Wydawnictwo Europa, Londyn, (tłum. H. Buczyńska-Garewicz).

Bailer-Jones D., 2001, Models, Metaphors, and Analogies, [w:] P. Machamer, M. Silberstein (red.), Guide to the Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Blacwell Publishers, s. 108–127.

Bailer-Jones D., 2009, Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press, http://digital.library.pitt.edu/cgi-bin/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=pittpress;cc=pittpress;q1=2012;rgn1=citation;idno=31735062137009;rgn=works;didno=31735062137009;view=image;seq=11;node=31735062137009%3A1;page=root;size=s;frm=frameset (dostęp 20.04.18).

Balkin J. M., 2002, (1998), Cultural Software: A theory of Ideology, Yale University Press.

Bańka J., 2008, O dwuświatowej ontologii w „Enneadach” Plotyna, „Lingua ac Communitas”, s. 115–125, http://www.lingua.amu.edu.pl/Lingua_9/BANKA.pdf (dostęp 08.04.18).

Barberousse A., Pascal L., 2009, Fictions and Models, [w:] M. Suárez (red.), Fictions in Science, Philosophical Essays on Modelling and Idealisation, London: Routledge, s. 56–75.

Barnden J. A., Wallington A. M., 2010, Metaphor and its unparalleled meaning and truth, [w:] A. Burkhardt, B. Nerlich (red.), Tropical Truths: The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes, De Gruyter, Berlin, s. 85–121.

Barnes B., Bloor D., 1993, Relatywizm, racjonalizm a socjologia wiedzy, (tłum. J. Niżnik), [w:] B. Barnes, D. Bloor, Mocny program socjologii wiedzy, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo IFIs PAN, s. 1–37.

Barnes T. J., 1997, Theories of Accumulation and Regulation: Bringing Life Back into Economic Geography Introduction to Section Three, [w:] Wills J., Lee R. (red.), Geographies of Economies, London: Arnold, s. 231–248.

Barsalou L. W., 1999, Perceptual symbol systems, „Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, 22, s. 577–666.

Barsalou L. W., 2008, Grounded cognition, „Annual Review of Psychology”, 59, s. 617–645.

Bateman J., Hois J., Ross R., Tenbrink T., 2010, A Linguistic Ontology of Space for Natural Language Processing, „Artificial Intelligence”, 17(14), s. 1027–1071.

Bayram F., 2010, Ideology and Political Discourse: a Critical Discourse Analysis of Erdogan’s Political Speech, „Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences”, 7, s. 23–40.

Beardsley M. C., 1958, Aesthetics, Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York.

Beardsley M. C., 1962, The metaphorical twist, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research”, 22(3), s. 293–307, https://doi.org/10.2307/2104415.

Behe M., 1996, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, New York: Touchstone.

Bell D., 1960, The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Ben-Jacob E., Becker I., Shapira Y., Levine H., 2004, Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence, „Trends Microbiol” 12(8), s. 366–372.

Berdayes V., Esposito L., Murphy J. W., 2004, The Body in Human Inquiry: Interdisciplinary Explorations of Embodiment, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.

Bergmann M., 1982, Metaphorical Assertions, „The Philosophical Review”, 91(2), s. 229–245.

Bhushan B., 2012, Biomimetics Bioinspired Hierarchical-Structured Surfaces for Green Science and Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Black M., 1962a, Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Models and Metaphors, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, s. 25–47.

Black M., 1962b, Models and Archetypes, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, s. 219–243.

Black M., 1979, More about Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 19–41.

Blackburn S., 1984, Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bloor D., 1993, Wittgenstein i Mannheim o socjologii matematyki, (tłum. W. Szydłowska, Z. Jankiewicz), [w:] Silny program socjologii wiedzy, Wyd. IFiS PAN, Warszawa.

Blumenberg H., 2010, Paradigms for a Metaphorology, Cornell University Press: Ithaca, New York, s. 178; (tłumacz. z niemieckiego Robert Savage), oryginał niemiecki: 1960, Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie, Suhrkamp Verlag Frankfurt am Main.

Boers F., 1999, When a Bodily Source Domain Becomes Prominent: the Joy of Counting Metaphors in the Socio-Economic Domain, [w:] R. W. Gibbs, G. Steen (red.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, s. 47–56.

Bohm D., 1988, Ukryty porządek, Pusty Obłok, Warszawa.

Bohm D., Hiley B., 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge, London.

Borbely A. F., 2008, Metaphor and Psychotherapy, [w:]: R. W. Jr. Gibbs (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 412–424.

Boroditsky L., 2000, Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors, „Cognition”, 75(1), s. 1–28.

Boroditsky L., 2001, Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time, „Cognitive Psychology”, 43(1), s. 1–22.

Boroditsky L., Ramscar M., 2002, The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought, „Psychological Science”, 13(2), s. 185–189.

Bowdle B., Gentner D., 1997, Informativity and asymmetry in comparisons, „Cognitive Psychology”, 34(3), s. 244–286.

Bowdle B., Gentner D., 2005, The Career of Metaphor, „Psychological Review”, 112(1), s. 193–216, http://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/gentner/papers/BowdleGentner05.pdf (dostęp 23.06.18).

Braithwaite R., 1954, The Nature of Theoretical Concepts and the Role of Models in an Advanced Science, „Revue Internationale de Philosophie”, 8(1/2), s. 34–40.

Brandl M. S., Metaphor(m) and Foundational Metaphors in Vincent van Gogh, http://www.metaphorandart.com/articles/vangoghmet.html (dostęp 08.06.18).

Breakwell G. M., 2001, Mental models and social representations of hazards: The significance of identity processes, „Journal of Risk Research”, 4, s. 341–351.

Bronk R., 2009, The Romantic Economist: Imagination in Economics, Cambridge University Press, New York, zob. także Richard Bronk, Cover Interview of May 22, 2009, http://rorotoko.com/interview/20090522_bronk_richard_romantic_economist_imagination_economics/?page=4 (dostęp 12.04.18).

Brown T. L., 2003a, Making Truth: Metaphor in Science, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Bunge M., 1973, Philosophy of Physics, Dordrecht: Reidel, s. 126.

Burkhardt A., 1990, Speech Acts, Meaning, and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John Searle, Berlin and New York: W. de Gruyter.

Bushe G. R., 2013, Generative process, generative outcome: The transformational potential of appreciative inquiry, [w:] D. L. Cooperrider, D. P. Zandee, L. N. Godwin, M. Avital, B. Boland (red.), Organizational Generativity: The Appreciative Inquiry Summit and a Scholarship of Transformation (Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, vol. 4, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, s. 89–113.

Bushman B. J., 2002, Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger and aggressive responding, „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, 28(6), s. 724–731.

Calbris G., 1990, The Semiotics of French Gestures, Bloomington, IN: IU Press.

Calbris G., 2003, L’expression gestuelle de la homme politique, Paris: CNRS Éditions, Collection CNRS pensée d’un Communication.

Calbris G., Porcher L., 1989, Geste et communication, Paris: Hatier-Crédif.

Caldwell J., Caldwell P., 1987, The Cultural Context of High Fertility in sub-Saharan Africa, „Population and Development Review” 13(3), s. 409–437.

Caldwell J., Caldwell P., Quiggin P., 1989, The Social Context of AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa, „Population and Development Review”, 17, s. 185–234.

Carnap R., 1938, Foundations of Logic and Mathematics, [w:] O. Neurath, C. Morris and R. Carnap (red.), International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science, vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s. 139–213.

Casasanto D., 2007, Space for Thinking, [w:] Vyvyan Evans, Paul Chilton (red.), Language, Cognition and Space: the state of the art and new directions, Equinox Publishing, London.

Charteris-Black J., 2005, (2011) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, London, Palgrave Macmillan.

Charteris-Black J., 2004, Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chase W. G., Simon H. A., 1973, Perception in chess, „Cognitive Psychology”, 4, s. 55–81.

Chilton P., Lakoff G., 1995, Foreign policy by metaphor, [w:] C. Schäffner, A. Wenden (red.), Language and Peace, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, s. 37–60.

Chlewiński Z., 1999, Umysł. Dynamiczna organizacja pojęć, Biblioteka Psychologii Współczesnej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Chomsky N., 2011, Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, oprac. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, Paul Portner, Walter de Gruyter, s. 466.

Cienki A., 1997, Motion in the metaphorical spaces of morality and reasoning as expressed in language and gesture, „International Journal of Communication”, 7, s. 85–98.

Cienki A., 1998, Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphorical expressions, [w:] J. P. Koenig (red.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, s. 189–204.

Cienki A., Müller C., 2008, Metaphor, gesture and thought, [w:] R. W. Gibbs Jr. (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 483–501.

Clark H. H., 1973, Space, time, semantics, and the child, [w:] T. E. Moore (red.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, New York: Academic Press, s. 27–83, (za: Boroditsky, 2000).

Clark A., 2008, Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension, New York: Oxford University Press.

Cohen J., 1967, Psychological time in health and disease, Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

Contessa G., 2010, Scientific models and fictional objects, „Synthese”, 172(2), s. 215–229, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9503-2.

Cooke N., 1999, Knowledge elicitation, [w:] F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, S. T. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, T. J. Perfect (red.), Handbook of applied cognition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, s. 479–509.

Coulehan J., 2003, Metaphor and Medicine: Narrative in Clinical Practice, „Humanities and Medicine, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 76, s. 87–95.

Cowart M., Embodied Cognition, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.iep.utm.edu/embodcog/ (dostęp 14.02.18).

Craik K. J. W., 1943, The nature of explanation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Csordas T., 1994, Embodiment and Experience. The existential ground for culture and self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Damasio A. R., 1999, The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness, New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.

Damasio A. R., 2003, Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain, New York: Hartcourt, Inc.

Danblon E., 2010, Persuasion: between trope and truth, [w:] A. Burkhardt, B. Nerlich, Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes, s. 73–84.

Davidson D., 1978, What Metaphors Mean, On Metaphor, Sacks, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s. 29–45.

Davidson D., 1992, Eseje o prawdzie, języku i umyśle, PWN, Warszawa.

Dawkins R., 2012, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Samolubny gen, (tłum. M. Skoneczny), Prószyński i Spółka.

Deacon T. W., 2012, Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter, Norton & Company, New York, London.

DeLong A. J., 1981, Phenomenological space-time toward an experimental relativity, „Science”, 213, s. 681–681.

Derrida J., 1986, Biała mitologia: metafora w tekście filozoficznym, „Pamiętnik Literacki”, 77/3, s. 283–318, (tłum. W. Krzemień, według: J. Derrida, Marges de la philosophie, Paris, 1972, s. 247–324), http://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media//files/ (dostęp 07.03.18).

De Vreese C., 2005, News framing: Theory and typology, „Information and Design Journal”, 13, s. 51–62.

DeYoung D. B., Hobbs D., 2009, Discovery of Design: Searching Out the Creator’s Secrets, New Leaf Publishing Group.

Dirven R., Frank R., (red.), 2001, Language and Ideology, vol. II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dove J. E., Everett L. A., Preece P. F., 1999, Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawings, „International Journal of Science Education”, 21, s. 485–497.

Eagleton T., 1991, Ideology. An Introduction, London–New York: Verso.

Efland A. D., 2002, Art and cognition: integrating the visual arts in the curriculum, New York: Teachers College Press, (za: D. Serig).

Eliasmith C., 2010, How We Ought to Describe Computation in the Brain, „Studies in History and Philosophy of Science”, 41, s. 313–320.

Evans V., 2004, The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Fairclough N., 1989, Language and Power, London: Longman.

Fairclough N., 1992, Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fauconnier G., Turner M., 1998, Conceptual integration networks, „Cognitive Science”, 22(2), s. 133–187.

Fauconnier G., Turner M., 2002, The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities, New York: Basic Books.

Feldman J. A., 2006, From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language, A Bradford Book The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.

Feser E., (red.), 2013, Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics, Palgrave Macmillan, London, New York.

Fillmore C., 1976, Topics in lexical semantics, [w:] P. Cole (red.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, s. 76–138.

Fillmore C., 1982a, Frame semantics, [w:] Linguistic Society of Korea, Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Seoul: Hashin, s. 111–138.

Fillmore C., 1982b, Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis, [w:] R. J. Jarvell, W. Klein (red.), Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, London: Wiley, s. 31–59.

Fillmore C., 1985, Frames and the semantics of understanding, „Quaderni Di Semantica”, 6, s. 222–254.

Fine A., 1993, Fictionalism, „Midwest Studies in Philosophy”, 18, s. 1–18, http://faculty.washington.edu/afine/Fictionalism.pdf (dostęp 06.04.18).

Flusberg S. J., Matlock T., Thibodeau P. H., 2017, Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change, „Environmental Communication”, 11(6), s. 769–783, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111 (dostęp 25.06.18).

Fojt T., 2009, The Construction of Scienti Knowledge through Metaphor, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.

Forceville C., Urios-Aparisi E., 2009, Multimodal Metaphor, Walter de Gruyer.

Forster M., 2004, Theories, Models and Curves, http://philosophy.wisc.edu/forster/520/Chapter%202.pdf (dostęp 15.02.18).

Fowler R., 1987, The Intervention of the Media in the Reproduction of Power, [w:] I. M. Zavala, T. A. Van Dijk, M. Diaz-Diocaretz, (red.), Approaches to discourse, poetics and psychiatry, Amsterdam: Benjamins, s. 67–80.

Frigg R., 2010a, Fiction in Science, [w:] John Woods (red.), Fictions and Models: New Essays, Munich: Philosophia Verlag, s. 247–287.

Frigg R., 2010b, Models and Fiction, „Synthese”, 172(2), s. 251–268.

Frigg R., Hartmann S., 2012, Models in Science, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/models-science/#OntWhaMod (dostęp 11.03.18).

Gallistel C. R., 1993, The organization of learning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gay W. C., 1992, Ricoeur on Metaphor and Ideology, „Darshana International”, 32(1), s. 59–70, http://www.philosophy.uncc.edu/wcgay/pubricoeur.htm (dostęp 21.04.18).

Geeraerts D., Grondelaers S., 1995, Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns, [w:] J. R. Taylor, R. E. MacLaury (red.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 153–179 (za: Kövecses, 2010, s. 171).

Geertz C., 2005, Ideologia jako system kulturowy, Interpretacja kultur, (tłum. M. M. Piechaczek), Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, s. 225–267.

Gentner D., 2002, Psychology of Mental models, [w:] N. J. Smelser, P. B. Bates (red.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, s. 9683–9687.

Gentner D., Gentner D. R., 1983, Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity, [w:] D. Gentner, A. L. Stevens (red.), Mental models, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, s. 99–129.

Gentner D., Bowdle B. F., Wolff P., Borobat C., 2001, Metaphor is like analogy, [w:] D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, B. K. Kokinov (red.), Perspectives from cognitive science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, s. 199–254.

Gevaert C., 2001, Anger in Old and Middle English: a ‘hot’ topic? „Belgian Essays on Language and Literature”, s. 9–101 (za: Kövecses, 1995).

Gevaert C., 2005, The ANGER IS HEAT question: Detecting cultural influence, [w:] N. Deelbecque, J. van der Auwera, D. Geeraerts (red.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 195–208.

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1992, Categorization and metaphor understanding, „Psychological Review”, 99(3), s. 572–577.

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1994a, The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language and understanding, Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1994b, Figurative thought and figurative language, [w:] M. Gernsbacher (red.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, s. 411–446.

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1996, Why many concepts are metaphorical, „Cognition”, s. 61, 309–319, http://psychology.illinoisstate.edu/jccutti/psych480_24/readings/gibbs1996.pdf (dostęp 23.06.18).

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 1999, Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world, [w:] R. W. Gibbs Jr., G. J. Steen (red.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, s. 145–166.

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 2006, Embodiment and Cognitive Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 2008, The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 474.

Gibbs R. W. Jr., 2011, Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory, „Discourse Processes”, 48(8), s. 529–562.

Gibbs R. W. Jr., Colston H., 1995, The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 6, s. 347–378.

Giere R. N., 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s. 78–86.

Giere R. N., 2006, Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Gierulanka D., 1962, Zagadnienie swoistości poznania matematycznego, PWN, Warszawa.

Gillespie N. C., 1990, Divine Design and the Industrial Revolution: William Paley’s Abortive Reform of Natural Theology, „Isis”, 81, s. 214–229 (za: Recker).

Glenberg A. M., Robertson D. A., 2000, Symbol grounding and meaning, A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning, „Journal of Memory and Language”, 43, s. 379–401.

Glennan S., 2000, A Model of Models, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1134/1/Models1.4.pdf? (dostęp 18.02.18).

Glicksohn J., 2001, Temporal Cognition and the Phenomenology of Time: A Multiplicative Function for Apparent Duration, „Consciousness and Cognition”, 10(1), s. 1–25.

Glucksberg S., 2001, Understanding Figurative Language: from Metaphors to Idioms, New York: Oxford University Press.

Glucksberg S., Haught C., 2006a, Can Florida become like the next Florida? When metaphoric comparisons fail, „Psychological Science”, 17, s. 935–938.

Glucksberg S., Haught C., 2006b, On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails, Mind and Language, 21(3), s. 360–378.

Glucksberg S., Keysar B., 1990, Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity, „Psychological Review”, 97, s. 3–18.

Goatly A., 2007, Washing Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins.

Gobet F., Clarkson G., 2004, Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four… or is it two?, „Memory”, 12, s. 732–747.

Godfrey-Smith P., 2006, The Strategy of Model-based Science, „Biology and Philosophy”, 21, s. 725–740.

Godfrey-Smith P., 2009, Models and Fictions in Science, „Philosophical Studies”, 143, s. 101–116.

Gold B., 2001, ‘Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being’, http://www.maa.org/reviews/wheremath.html (dostęp 04.05.18).

Goodman N., 1976, Languages of Art: An Approach to A theory of Symbols, (2 wydanie) Indianopolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Gould S. J., Vrba E. S., 1982, Exaptation-A Missing Term in the Science of Form, „Paleobiology”, 8(1), s. 4–15, http://www2.hawaii.edu/~khayes/Journal_Club/fall2006/Gould_&_Vrb_1982_Paleobio.pdf (dostęp 05.04.18).

Grady J., 1997a, Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes, University of California at Berkeley (unpublished doctoral dissertation).

Grady J., 1997b, THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 8(4), s. 267– 290, https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267.

Grady J., 1999, A typology for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance, [w:] R. W. Gibbs, G. Steen (red.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins, s. 79–100.

Grady J., 2005, Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 37, s. 1595–1614, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012.

Grice P., 1975, Logic and conversation, [w:] P. Cole, J. L. Morgan (red.), Syntax and semantics, 5(3), New York: Academic Press, s. 41–58; (tłumaczenie polskie: Logika i konwersacja, 1977, „Przegląd Humanistyczny”, 6, s. 85–99 oraz 1980, [w:] B. Stanosz (red.), Język w świetle nauki, Czytelnik, Warszawa, s. 91–114), http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).

Griesemer J., 1990, Modeling in the Museum: On the Role of Remnant Models, „Biology and Philosophy”, 5, s. 3–36.

Groseclose T., Milyo J., 2005, A Measure of Media Bias, „The Quaterly Journal of Ecnomics”, 120(4), s. 1191–1237.

Gruber J., 1965, Studies in Lexical Relations, MIT, Cambridge.

Haglund J., 2013, Collaborative and self-generated analogies in science education, „Studies in Science Education”, 49(1), s. 35–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.801119 http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:621708/FULLTEXT01.pdf (dostęp 13.06. 18).

Hall R. I., Aitchison P. W., Kocay W. L., 1994, Causal policy maps of managers: formal methods for elicitation and analysis, „Systems Dynamics Review”, 10, s. 337–360.

Hawk O., Johnsrude J., Pulvermüller F., 2004, Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex, „Neuron”, 41(2), s. 301–307.

Hawking S., Mlodinow L., 2010, The Grand Design, New York: Bantam Books.

Hedblom M. M., Kutz O., Neuhaus F., 2016, Image schemas in computational conceptual blending, „Cognitive Systems Research”, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys (dostęp 12.01.18).

Hefferman P., 1976, Jobs for the Environment: The Coming Green Collar Revolution, [w:] Jobs and Prices in the West Coast Region: Hearing before the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States.

Heisenberg W., 1970, Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science, Harper & Row, Fizyka a filozofia, (tłum. S. Amsterdamski), http://filozofiauw.wdfiles.com/local--fi.%20C%20-%20Fizyka%20a%20fi zofia.pdf (dostęp 02.03.18).

Hellingwerf K. J., 2005, Bacterial observations: a rudimentary form of intelligence? „Trends Microbiol”, 13(4), s. 152–158.

Helmreich S., 2011, What is Life? Answers from Three Limit Biologies, Critical „Inquiry”, 37, University of Chicago, s. 671– 696.

Hempel C. G., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Free Press.

Henderson D. W., 2002, Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being, „The Mathematical Intelligencer”, 24(1), s. 75–76.

Henderson W., 1982, Metaphor in economics, „Economics”, 18, s. 147–157.

Hesse M. B., 1953, Models in Physics, „British Journal for the Philosophy of Science”, 4, s. 198–214.

Hesse M. B., 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame, Ind. University of Notre Dame Press.

Heßler M., 2006, (red.), Konstruierte Sichtbarkeiten. Wissenschafts und Technikbilder seit der Frühen Neuzeit, Verlagsort: München.

Higgins E. T., 1996, Knowledge Activation: Accessibility, Applicability, and Salience, [w:] E. T. Higgins, A. Kruglansky (red.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, New York: Guilford Presss, s. 133–168.

Himma K. E., 2005, The Application-Conditions for Design Inferences: Why the Design Arguments Need the Help of Other Arguments for God’s Existence, „International Journal for Philosophy of Religion”, 57, s. 1–33 (za: Recker).

Hinman L. M., 1982, Nietzsche, Metaphor, and Truth, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research”, 43(2), s. 179–199.

Hintzman D. L., 1986, Schema Abstraction’ in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model, „Psychological Review”, 93, s. 328–338.

Hiraga M., 1991, Metaphors Japanese women live by, „Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism” 1(1), s. 38–57, (AILA Commission on Language and Gender).

Hodgkinson G. P., Maule A. J., Brown N., 2004, Causal cognitive mapping in the organizational strategy field: A comparison of alternative elicitation procedures, „Organizational Research Methods”, 7, s. 3–26.

Hofstadter D. R., 2001, Epilogue: Analogy as the Core of Cognition, [w:] D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, B. K. Kokinov (red.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, s. 499–539.

Hofstadter D. R., 2013, The nature of categories and concepts, Stanford Symbolic Systems Distinguished Speaker Lecture (opublikowany 07.03.2014), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr3QDMkMGmQ&list=RDKr3QDMkMGmQ#t=4341 (dostęp 21.06.18).

Holyoak K. J., Thagard P., 1995, Mental Leaps, Analogy in Creative Thought. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.

Horgan J., 1999, Koniec nauki, czyli o granicach wiedzy schyłku ery naukowej, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa.

Humphreys P., 2002, Computational Models, „Philosophy of Science”, 69, s. 1–11. Hutcheon P. D., 2012, A Critique of ‘Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA’ http://www.humanists.net/pdhutcheon/humanist%20articles/lewontn.htm (dostęp 08.06.18).

James W., 1890, Principles of Psychology, vol. I, London: Macmillan.

James W., 1974, Pragmatism and Four Essays from The Meaning of Truth, New American Library, New York, reprint: Pragmatism (1907) oraz The Meaning of Truth (1909); (tłum. W. N. Kozłowski), Pragmatyzm. Kraków, vis-a-vis/Etiuda, 2016, Znaczenie prawdy, (tłum. Michał Szczubiałka), Warszawa: KR, 2000.

Johanson M., Papafragou A., 2014, What does children’s spatial language reveal about spatial concepts? Evidence from the use of containment expressions, „Cognitive Science”, 38(5), s. 881–910.

Johnson M., 1987, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johnson M., 2007, The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johnson P. E., 1991, Darwin on Trial, Washington DC: Regnery Gateway Publishing Company, 1991, http://www.maxddl.org/Creation/Darwin%20On%20Trial.pdf (dostęp 14.05.18).

Johnson-Laird P. N., 2004, The history of mental models, [w:] K. Manktelow, M. C. Chun (red.), Psychology of Reasoning: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives, New York: Psychology Press, s. 179–212. http://mentalmodels.princeton.edu/papers/2005HistoryMentalModels.pdf (2005) (dostęp 15.06.18).

Johnson-Laird P. N., 2005, Mental models in thought, [w:] K. Holyoak, R. J. Sternberg (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, s. 179–212.

Johnson-Laird P. N., 2010, Mental models and human reasoning, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1012933107 (dostęp 14.02.18).

Jones N. A., Ross H., Lynam T., Perez P., Leitch A., 2011, Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Method, „Ecology and Society”, 16(1), art. 46, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/ (dostęp 13.05.18).

Kampis G., 1991, Self-modifying systems in biology and cognitive science. A New Framework for Dynamics, Information and Complexity, Pergamon Press, Oxford (za: Marques i Brito, s. 81).

Kauffman S. A., 2000, Investigations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Keller E. F., 1995, Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth century Biology, Columbia University Press.

Kelley R. E., 1985, The Gold-Collar Worker: Harnessing the Brainpower of the New Work Force, Reading, MASS: Addison-Wesley.

Kelling G., 1991, Crime and Metaphor: Towards a New Concept of Policing, „City Journal” 1, www.city-journal.org/html/issue1 (dostęp 08.05.18).

Kendall J. E., Kendall K. E., 1993, Metaphors and Methodologies: Living Beyond The System Machine, „MIS (Management Information System) Quarterly”, 17(2), s. 149–171.

Kintsch W., 2000, Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory, „Psychonomic Bulletin & Review”, 7, s. 257–266.

Kittay E. F., Lehrer, A., 1981, Semantic fields and the structure of metaphor, „Studies in Language”, 5, 31–63, https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.5.1.03kit.

Klamer A., Leonard T. C., 1994, So what’s an economic metaphor?, [w:] P. Mirowski (red.), Natural Images in Economic Thought: Markets Read in Tooth and Claw, Cambridge University Press, s. 20–52, https://www.princeton.edu/~tleonard/papers/metaphor.pdf (dostęp 06.04.18).

Kleider H. M., Pezdek K., Goldinger S. D., Kirk A., 2008, Schema-driven source misattribution errors: Remembering the expected from a witnessed event, „Applied Cognitive Psychology”, 22(1), s. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1361.

Klein G., 1998, Sources of Power, How People Make Decisions, MIT Press.

Knuuttila T., Loettgers A., 2012, The productive tension, [w:] P. Humphreys, C. Imbert, (red.), Models, Simulations and Representations, London: Routledge.

Knuuttila T., 2009, Isolating Representations vs. Credible Constructions?, „Erkenntnis”, 70, s. 59–80.

Knuuttila T., 2011, Modelling and Representing, „Studies in History and Philosophy of Science”, 42, s. 262–271.

Koestler A., 1964, The Act of Creation, London: Hutchinson & Co. (przedruk: Penguin Books: Arcana, 1989).

Koller V., 2004, Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kövecses Z., 1995, Anger: Its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural evidence, [w:] J. R. Taylor, R. E. MacLaury (red.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, s. 79–92.

Kövecses Z., 2000, Metaphor and Emotion, Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses Z., 2005, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation, New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kövesces Z., 2006, Language, Mind and Culture, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Krąpiec M. A., 1993, Teoria analogii bytu, Dzieła, t. I, Lublin, s. 315.

Kuhn T., 1979, Metaphor in Science, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss, s. 409–419.

Kuhn W., 2002, Modeling the semantics of geographic categories through conceptual integration, International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, s. 108–118.

Kuhn W., 2007, An Image-Schematic Account of Spacial Categories, [w:] S. Winter, M. Duckham, L. Kulik, B. Kuipers (red.), Spatial Information Theory, vol. 4736, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer, s. 152–168.

Kuorikoski J., Lehtinen A., Marchionni C., 2010, Economic modelling as robustness analysis, „British Journal for the Philosophy of Science”, 61, s. 541–567.

Kuypers J. A., 1997, Agenda-setting, Agenda-Extension, and Framing Analysis, [w:] J. A. Kuypers, Presidential Crisis Rhetoric and the Press in the Post-cold War World, Greenwood Publishing Group.

Kuypers J. A., 2006, Bush’s War: Media Bias and Justifications for War in a Terrorist Age, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Lakoff G., 1987, Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff G., 1990, The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schema?, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 1(1), s. 39–74, https://georgelakoff.files.wordpress. com/2014/11/invariance-hypothesis-lakoff-1990.pdf (dostęp 23.06.18).

Lakoff G., 1990, The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 1(1), s. 39–74.

Lakoff G., 1993, The contemporary theory of metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and thought (wydanie drugie), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, s. 202–215.

Lakoff G., 1993, The contemporary theory of metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought (wydanie drugie), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, s. 202–251.

Lakoff G., 1995, Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, Or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust, „Social Research”, 62(2), s. 177–214.

Lakoff G., 1996, Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff G., 2004 (2008), Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: the Essential Guide for Progressives, Chelsea Green Publishing.

Lakoff G., 2008, The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain, New York, NY: Penguin Press.

Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1980, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Metafory w naszym życiu, (tłum. T. Krzeszowski), Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1988.

Lakoff G., Turner M., 1989, More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to poetic Metaphor, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1999, Philosophy In the Flesh: The Embodied Mind And Its Challenge To Western Thought, New York, NY: Basic Books.

Lakoff G., Núñez R., 2000, Where Mathematics Comes From. How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being, New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff G., Espenson J., Schwartz A., 1991, Master metaphor list, second draft copy, http://araw.mede.uic.edu/~alansz/metaphor/METAPHORLIST.pdf (dostęp 25.06.18).

Landau M. J., Sullivan D., Greenberg J., 2009, Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes, „Psychological Science”, 20, s. 1421–1427, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2009.02462.

Lapin S., 1981, Sorts, Ontology, and Metaphor, Berlin and New York: Waiter de Gruyter. LeDoux J., 2002, Synaptic self, New York: Penguin.

Leng M., 2010, Mathematics and Reality, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Leśmian B., 1983, W malinowym chruśniaku, Poezje wybrane, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław–Warszawa, s. 92.

Levins R., 1966, The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology, „American Scientist”, 54, s. 421–431.

Lévi-Strauss C., 1962, La Pensée sauvage, Paris: Plon, Myśl nieoswojona, (tłum. A. Zajączkowski), 1969, PWN.

Lewontin R. C., 1991, The doctrine of DNA: Biology as ideology, New York: Harper Perennial.

Lewontin R. C., 2004, Gene, Organism and Environment: Bad Metaphors and Good Biology with UC Berkeley Graduate Lectures, http://www.uctv.tv/shows/Gene-Organism-and-Environment-Bad-Metaphors-and-Good-Biology-with-Richard-Lewontin-8393 (dostęp 17.01.18).

Lima P. L. C., 2006, About primary metaphor, „Delta”, 22, s. 109–122, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502006000300009.

Linden A., 2008, Mindworks: An introduction to NLP, Crown House Publishing.

Llewellyn Karl N., 1930, A Realistic Jurisprudence – The New Step, „Columbia Law Review”, 30(4), s. 431–46.

Locke J., 1690, Rozważania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego, Księga III, rozdz. 3, art. 15; za: Encyklopedia Stanford http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sortals/ (dostęp 05.03.18).

Lovelock J., 1991, Gaia, The practical science of planetary medicine, London: Gaia Books.

Lovelock J., 1995, The ages of Gaia, (wydanie drugie), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lowe T. D., Lorenzoni I., 2007, Danger is all around: eliciting expert perceptions for managing climate change through a mental models approach, „Global Environmental Change”, 17, s. 131–146.

Lyon P., 2015, The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered, „Frontiers in Microbiology”, 6, s. 264, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00264, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4396460/ (dostęp 28.06.18).

Maalej Z. A., Yu N., 2011, Embodiment Via Body Parts: Studies from Various Languages and Cultures, John Benjamins Publishing.

MacCormac E., 1985, A cognitive theory of metaphor, Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.

Machamer P., 2000, The Nature of Metaphor and Scientific Description, [w:] F. Hallyn (red.), Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, s. 35–52.

Mackie J. L., 1982, The Miracle of Theism: Arguments For and Against the Existence of God, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (za: Recker).

MacWhinney B., 2008, How mental models encode embodied linguistic perspectives, [w:] R. Klatzky, B. MacWhinney, M. Behrmann (red.), Embodied cognition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, s. 365–405.

Madsen M. W., 2016, Cognitive Metaphor Theory and the Metaphysics of Immediacy, „Cognitive Science”, 40, s. 881–908.

Mandler J. M., 1992, How to build a baby: Conceptual primitives, „Psychological Review”, 99(4), s. 587–604.

Mandler J. M., 2008, On the Birth and Growth of Concepts, „Philosophical Psychology”, 21(2), s. 207–230.

Mandler J. M., Canovas C. P., 2014, On defining image schemas, „Language and Cognition”, 6(4), s. 510–532.

Marciszewski W., 1994, Sztuka rozumowania w świetle logiki, Aleph, Warszawa.

Marcus H., Zajonc R. B., 1985, The Cognitive Perspective in Social Psychology, [w:] G. Lindzey, E. Aronson (red.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, (wydanie trzecie), New York: Random House, s. 137–229.

Margulis L., Sagan D., 1995, What is Life?, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Marijuán P. C., Navarro J., del Moral R., 2010, On prokaryotic intelligence: strategie for sensing the environment, „Biosystems”, 92(2), 94–103.

Markman A. B., Dietrich E., 2000, Extending the classical view of representation, „Trends in Cognitive Science”, 4, s. 470–475.

Marques V., Brito C., 2014, The Rise and Fall of the Machine Metaphor: Organizational Similarities and Differences between Machines and Living Beings, „Verifichte”, 43(1/3), s. 77–111.

Martinich A. P., 1984, A Theory for Metaphor, „Journal of Literary Semantics”, 13, s. 34–56, https://www.msu.edu/~orourk51/360-Phil/Spring2015/Readings/Martinich.pdf (dostęp 31.03.18).

Matlock T., Coe C., Westerling L., 2017, Monster wildfires and metaphor, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 32(4), s. 250–261.

Maturana H. R., Varela F. J., 1980, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (1991, 2012), Springer Science & Business Media Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing., 2012, seria: „Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science”, t. 42.

Mayr E., 1985, How biology differs from the physical sciences, [w:] D. J. Depew, B. H. Weber (red.), Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 43–63.

Mayr E., 2004, What Makes Biology Unique, Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline, Rozdział 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 39–66.

Mazodier P., Davies J., 1991, Gene Transfer between Distantly related Bacteria, „Annual Review of Genetics”, 25, s. 147–171, http://web.mit.edu/kdrinkwa/Public/tklab/for-mfpapers/Mazodier91.pdf (dostęp 05.04.18).

McCloskey D. N., 1986, The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

McGlone M. S., 2011, Hyperbole, homunculi and hindsight bias: An alternative evaluation of conceptual metaphor theory, „Discourse Processes”, 48(8), s. 563–574.

McNeill D., Duncan S., 2000, Growth Points in Thinking-for-Speaking, [w:] D. McNeill (red.), Language and Gesture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 141–161.

McNeill D., Cassell J., Levy E. T., 1993, Abstract deixis, „Semiotica”, 95, s. 5–19.

McRae K., Jones M., 2013, Semantic Memory, [w:] D. Reisberg (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, s. 206–216.

Merleau-Ponty M., 1945, Phénoménologie de la perception, Paris: Gallimard, Fenomenologia percepcji, (tłum. M. Kowalska, J. Migasiński), Warszawa, Aletheia, 2016.

Miller G. A., 1956, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information, „Psychological Review”, 63(2), s. 81–97.

Morgan M. G., Fischhoff B., Bostrom A., Atman C., 2002, Risk communication: a mental models approach, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

Moss L., 2004, What Genes Can’t Do, MIT Press, Cambridge.

Mossio M., Moreno A., 2010, Organisational Closure in Biological Organisms, „History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences”, 54(32), s. 269–288.

Müller C., 1998, Iconicity and gesture, [w:] S. Santi et al. (red.), Oralité et Gestualité: Communication Multimodale, Interaction, Montréal, Paris: L’Harmattan, s. 321–328.

Müller C., 2004, Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? [w:] C. Müller, R. Posner (red.), The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, Berlin: Weidler, s. 233 –256.

Murdock. B. B., Jr., 1974, Human memory: Theory and data, Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbclum Associates.

Murphy G. I., 2002, The Big Book of Concepts, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Musolff A., 2004, Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogic Reasoning in Debates about Europe, New York: Palgrave.

Nagel E., 1961, The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Struktura nauki, zagadnienia logiki wyjaśnień naukowych, (tłum. J. Giedymin, B. Rassalski, H. Eilstein), 1970, PWN.

Negro A. I., 2011, Metaphor and ideology in the business press: The case of the Endesa take over, „Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies”, 43, s. 73–85.

Neisser U., 1967, Cognitive Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Neisser U., 1976, Cognition and Reality, Freeman, San Francisco, CA.

Nersessian N. J., 2002, The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science, [w:] P. Carruthers, S. Stich, M. Siegal, (red.), The cognitive basis of science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, s. 133–153.

Nicholson D. J., 2013, Organisms Machines, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(4), s. 669–678, http://www.academia.edu/3448382/Organisms_Machines (dostęp 15.02.18).

Nietzsche F., 2004, Przedstawienie retoryki antycznej, Pisma pozostałe, Kraków.

Noë A., 2004, Action in Perception, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.

Nosofsky R. M., 1986, Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: General”, 115(1), s. 39–57.

Núñez R. E., Sweetser E., 2006, With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time, „Cognitive Science”, 30, s. 401–450, http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~nunez/web/FINALpblshd.pdf (dostęp 30.04.18).

O’Mara Shimek M., Guillen-Para M., Ortega-Larrea A., 2015, Stop the bleeding or weather the storm? Crisis solution marketing and the ideological use of metaphor in online financial reporting of the stock market crash of 2008 at the New York Stock Exchange, „Discourse & Communication”, 9(1), s. 103–123.

Oakley T., 2007, Image schema, [w:] D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford University Press, s. 214–235.

Odenbaugh J., 2003, Complex Systems, Trade-Offs, and Theoretical population Biology, „Philosophy of Science”, 70, s. 1496–1507.

Ortiz M. J., 2010, Primary metaphors and monomodal visual metaphors, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 43(6), s. 1568–1580, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.003.

Ornstein R., 1969, On the experience of Time, Hammondsworth: Penguin.

Ortony A., 1993, Metaphor, language and thought, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, s. 1–16, (wyd. drugie), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.003 (dostęp 25.06.18).

Orzack S., Sober E., 1993, A Critical Assessment of Levins’s ‘The Strategy of Model Building (1966)’, „Quarterly Review of Biology”, 68, s. 534–546.

Osborne R. J., Cosgrove M. M., 1983, Children’s conceptions of the changes of the state of water, „Journal of Research in Science Teaching”, 20, s. 825–838.

Overton W. F., Müller U., Newman J. L., 2008, Developmental Perspectives on Embodiment and Consciousness, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.

Paley W., [1802] 1809, Natural Theology, or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity. Collected from the Appearances of Nature, [w:] G. W. Meadley (red.), The Works of William Paley, t. 1, (za: Recker, s. 648–649).

Papafragou A., Massey C., Gleitman L., 2002, Shake, rattle ‘n’ roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition, „Cognition”, 84, s. 189–219.

Pattee H. H., 1971, Physical theories of biological co-ordinatio, „Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics”, 4(2/3), s. 255–276, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/quarterly-reviews-of-biophysics/article/physical-theories-of-biological-co-ordination/75476C2 D9241B0ED0670DD84811505C6 (dostęp 07.04.18).

Payne B. K., Gawronski B., 2010, A History of Implicit Social Cognition: Where Is It Coming From? Where Is It Now? Where Is It Going? [w:] B. Gawronski, B. K. Payne (red.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press, s. 1–15.

Peirce C. S., 1906, Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmatism, „The Monist”, 16(4), s. 492–546, https://archive.org/details/jstor-27899680 (dostęp 12.02.18).

Peirce C. S., 1997, Wybór pism semiotycznych, (tłum. R. Mirek, A. Nowak), Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne, Warszawa.

Penson R. T., Schapira L., Daniels J., Lynch T. J., Cancer as Metaphor, „The Oncologist”, (6), s. 708–716, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8165170_Cancer_as_Metaphor (dostęp 25.06.18).

Pepper S., 1942, World Hypotheses, Berkeley: University of California Press, (za: Klamer, Leaonard).

Percy E. J., Hoffmann J. L., Sherman S. J., 2011, Sticky Metaphors and the Persistence of the Traditional Voluntary Manslaughter Doctrine, „Journal of Law Reform”, 44(2), s. 383–427.

Pinker S., 1994, The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind, London: Penguin.

Pinker S., 1997, How the mind works, New York: Norton.

Pinker S., 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, Penguin, New York.

Pinker S., 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, New York: Penguin Group Viking Press.

Plutynski A., 2001, Modeling Evolution in Theory and Practice, „Philosophy of Science”, 68, s. 225–236.

Pogonowski J., 2011, Geneza matematyki wedle kognitywistów, „Investigationes Linguisticae”, 23, s. 106–147, http://inveling.amu.edu.pl/ http://www.logic.amu.edu.pl/images/3/3c/Littlejill01.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).

Pogonowski J., 2012, Matematyczne metafory kognitywistów, http://www.logic.amu.edu.pl/images/0/0e/M„mk2012.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).

Pogonowski J., Wrocław, 2013, Matematyczne fantazje kognitywistów, http://logic.amu.edu.pl/images/3/32/Mfk2013.pdf (dostęp 28.06.18).

Portides D. P., 2008, Models, [w:] S. Psillos, M. Curd (red.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, New York: Routledge, s. 383–395.

Priest G., Routley R., 1989, The History of Paraconsistent Logic, [w:] G. Priest, R. Routley, J. Norman, Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, München: Philosophia Verlag, Rozdział 1.

Pulaczewska H., 1999, Aspects of metaphor in physics: Examples and case studies, Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Putnam H., 1975, The Meaning of ‘Meaning’, „Language, mind, and knowledge. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science”, t. 7, s. 131–193.

Quine W., 1953, On What There Is, [w:] From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, O tym, co istnieje, [w:] Z punktu widzenia logiki, (tłum. B. Stanosz), PWN, Warszawa, 1969.

Quine W., 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge MA: MIT Press; Słowo i przedmiot (tłum. C. Cieśliński), Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia, 1999.

Raerinne J., 2013, Robustness and sensitivity of biological models, Philosophical Studies, 166(2), s. 285–303.

Ramsey W., 2007, Representation Reconsidered, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Recker D., 2010, How to Confuse Organisms with Mousetraps: Machine Metaphors and Intelligent Design, The Design Metaphor, „Zygon”, 45(3), s. 647–664, doi/10.1111/j. 1467-9744.2010.01119.x/pdf www.zygonjournal.org (dostęp 12.03.18).

Reddy J. M., 1979, The Conduit Metaphor – A case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 284–310.

Reid J. N., Katz A. N., 2018, Something false about conceptual metaphors, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 33(1), s. 36–47.

Richards I. A., 1936, The Philosophy of Rhetoric, Oxford University Press, London, New York.

Ricoeur P., 1975, La métaphore vive, Paris: Seuil; The Rule of Metaphor; Multi-Disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.

Root-Bernstein R. S., Root-Bernstein M., 2003, Innovative Tools for Innovative Thinking, [w:] L. V. Shavinina (red.), International Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Elsevier Science, s. 377–387.

Rorty R., 1995, Filozofia jako nauka, jako metafora i jako polityka, [w:] A. Szahaj (red.), Między pragmatyzmem a postmodernizmem, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, s. 13–36.

Rorty R., 2003, Zmierzch prawdy ostatecznej i narodziny kultury literackiej, (tłum. A. Szahaj), „Teksty Drugie”, 6, s. 113–130.

Rosaldo M. Z., 1980, Knowledge and passion. Ilongot notions of self and social life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (za: Kövecses, 2010, s. 171).

Rosch E., 1978, Principles of categorization, [w:] E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd (red.), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, s. 27–48.

Rosen R., 1991, Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into Nature, Origin and Fabrication of Life, Columbia University Press, New York.

Ruiz de Mendoza F. J., 1998, On the nature of blending as cognitive phenomenon, „Journal of Pragmatics”, 30(3), s. 259–274.

Rumelhart D. E., Abrahamson A. A., 1973, A model for analogical reasoning, „Cognitive Psychology”, 5, s. 1–28.

Rybarkiewicz D., 1997, Three Aspects of Metaphor, „Logica Trianguli”, 1, s. 93–103.

Rybarkiewicz D., 1998, The Structure of Metaphor: Towards a Pragmatic Approach, „Logica Trianguli”, 2, s. 103–115.

Rybarkiewicz D., 2002, Is Metaphor an Illocutionary Act?, „Bulletin of the Section of Logic”, 31(1), s. 47–57.

Rybarkiewicz D., 2015a, Out of the box thinking, [w:] P. Łukowski, A. Gemel, B. Żukowski (red.), Cognition, Meaning, and Action: Lodz – Lund Studies in Cognitive Science, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, Kraków, s. 152–167.

Rybarkiewicz D., 2015b, Rozumowanie metaforyczne, czyli ‘metaforą po oczach’, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Iuridica”, 75, s. 207–225.

Rybarkiewicz D., 2017, Metafora w działaniu, Wydawnictwo Uniwerstetu Łódzkiego.

Ryle G. 1970 (1949), Czym jest umysł, (tłum. W. Marciszewski) PWN, Warszawa.

Samarapungavan A., Vosniaudou S., Brewe W. F., 1996, Mental models of the earth, sun and moon, „Cognitive Development”, 11, s. 491–521.

Schmidt S. R., 2012, Extraordinary Memories for Exceptional Events, Psychology Press: Taylor & Francis Group, New York, London.

Schneider S. H., 1997, Laboratory Earth: The planetary gamble we can’t afford to lose, New York: Basic Books.

Schön D. A., 1993 [1979], Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought (wyd. drugie) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Mass., s. 137–163.

Searle J. R., 1980, Metaphor, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 92–124.

Shackle G. L. S., 1965, A scheme of economic theory, London, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Shanks N., 2004, God, the Devil, and Darwin: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (za: Recker).

Shapir L., 2011, Embodied cognition, New York: Routledge.

Shapiro L., 2004, The Mind Incarnate, Cambridge, MA, and London, UK: The MIT Press.

Shapiro L., 2010, Embodied cognition, [w:] E. Margolis, R. Samuels, S. Stich (red.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sharifan F., Driven R., Yu N., Niemeier S., 2008, Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Sheldrake R., 1988, The Presence of the Past: morphic resonance and the habits of nature, New York, NY: Times Books.

Silaski N., 2012, Metaphors and ideology: Gendered metaphors in economic discourse, „Versita”, https://doi.org/10.2478/V10320–012–0019–4.

Sinha C., Jensen de López K., 2000, Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition, „Cognitive Linguistics”, 11(1/2), s. 17–41.

Sober E., 2000, Philosophy of Biology, (wydanie drugie), Boulder, Colo.: Westview, (za: Recker).

Soreanu R., 2010, Metaphor in the Social Sciences: Creative Methodologies and Some Elements for an Epistemological Reconstruction, „Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Sociologia”, 55(1), s. 239–254.

Sowa J., 1984, Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine, Boston: Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., s. 4.

Sperber D., Wilson D., 1986, Relevance, Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Sterman J. D., 2000, Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Stillwagon E., 2012, The Background to Behavior Modification Strategies for Fighting Aids in Africa, [w:] K. Anyidoho, H. Lauer (red.), Reclaiming the Human Sciences and Humanities Through African Perspectives, vol. 2, Sub-Saharan Publishers Accra, Ghana, s. 997–1016.

Strawson P. F., 1980, Indywidua: Próba metafizyki opisowej, PAX, Warszawa, (tłum. B. Chwedeńczuk), Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics [1959].

Suppe F., 1989, The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Suppes P., 1960, A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences, „Synthese”, 12(2/3), s. 287–300.

Swan J., Newell S., 1998, Making sense of the technological innovation: The political and social dynamics of cognition, [w:] C. Eden, J. C. Spencer (red.), Managerial and organizational cognition, Sage Publications, London, UK, s. 108–129.

Sypnowich C., 2014, Law and Ideology, [w:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/law-ideology/ (dostęp 12.05.18).

Taverniers M., 2002, Metaphor and Metaphorology: A Selective Genealogy of Philosophical and Linguistic Conceptions of Metaphor from Aristotle to the 1990s, Gent, Academia Press, Studia Germanica Candensia.

Tendahl M., 2009, A hybrid theory of metaphor: Relevance theory and cognitive linguistics, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Thagard P., 2005, Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science (wydanie drugie), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Thagard T., Toombs E., 2005, Atoms, categorization and conceptual change, [w:] H. Cohen, C. Lefebvre (red.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, Elsevier Science B. v, s. 243–254.

Thelen E., Smith, L., 1994, A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Thibodeau P. H., Durgin F. H., 2011, Metaphor aptness and conventionality: A processing fluency account, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 26, s. 206–226.

Thibodeau P., Boroditsky L., 2011, Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning, „Plos One”, 6(2), E16782, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 oraz http://lera.ucsd.edu/papers/crime-metaphors.pdf (dostęp 02.04.18).

Thompson E., 2007, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Thompson J. B., 1990, Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass, Communication Cambridge: Polity Press.

Tinbergen N., 1963, On the aims and methods of ethology, „Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie”, 20, s. 410-163.

Tomasz z Akwinu, Komentarz do Sentencyj; cyt. za: M. A. Krąpiec, Teoria analogii bytu, Dzieła, t. I, Lublin, 1993, s. 315.

Tonneau F., 2011/2012, Metaphor and Truth: A Review of Representation Reconsidered by W. M. Ramsey, „Behavior and Philosophy”, 39/40, s. 331–343.

Toon A., 2010, Models as Make-Believe, [w:] R. Frigg, M. Hunter (red.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Springer, s. 71–96.

Turbayne C. M., 1970, The Myth of Metaphor, Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.

Tversky A., 1977, Features of Similarity, „Psychological Review”, 84, s. 327–352.

Valenzuela J., 2009, What empirical work can tell us about Primary Metaphors, „Quaderns de Filologia Estudis Linguistics”, 14, s. 235–249.

Van Benthem J., Minica S., 2012, Toward a Dynamic Logic of Questions, „Journal of Philosophical Logic”, 41, s. 633–669, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-012-9233-7.

Van Dijk T. A.,1998, Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London: SAGE.

Van Fraassen B. C., 1980, The Scientific Image, The Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Vanderveken D., 1985, Non-literal Speech Acts, „Cahiers d’Epistemologie”, Universite de Quebec, Montreal.

Vanderveken D., 1990, Meaning and Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press.

Varela F., 1979, Principles of biological autonomy, Elsevier North Holland, New York.

Varela F., Thompson E., Rosch E., 1991, The Embodied Mind: Cognitive science and human Experience, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Vico G., 1966, Nauka nowa, (tłum. J. Jakubowicz), oprac. S. Krzemień-Ojak, Warszawa.

Voorhees B., 2004, Embodied Mathematics, „Journal of Consciousness Studies”, 11(9), s. 83–88.

Vosgerau G., 2006, The Perceptual Nature of Mental Models, [w:] C. Held, M. Knauff, G. Vosgerau (red.), Mental Models and the Mind, Oxford: Elsevier B. V, s. 255–275, https://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/fileadmin/Redaktion/Institute/Philosophie/Theoretische_Philosophie/Vosgerau/MM_vosgerau.pdf (dostęp 15.02.18).

Vosniaudou S., Brewer W. F., 1992, Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood, „Cognitive Psychology”, 24, s. 535–585.

Walton K. L., 1990, Mimesis as Make-believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Watkins K. W., 1989, Chemical metaphors, „Journal of Chemistry Education”, 66(12), 1020 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed066p1020.

Weisberg M., 2013, Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World, Oxford University Press.

Weiss G., Haber H. F., 1999, Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersection of Nature and Culture, Routledge.

Wen L., Weaver J. C., Lauder G. V., 2014, Biomimetic shark skin: design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function, „Journal of Experimental Biology”, 217, s. 1656–1666, https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.097097 http://jeb.biologists.org/content/217/10/1656 (dostęp 07.04.18).

Wertheimer M., 1958, Principles of perceptual organization, [w:] D. C. Beardslee, M. Wertheimer (red.), Readings in perception, Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, s. 115–135, (za: M. J. Ortiz, 2010, Visual Rhetoric: Primary Metaphors and Symmetric Object Alignment, „Metaphor and Symbol”, 25(3), s. 162–180).

Wheeler M., 2005, Reconstructing the Cognitive World, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Whorf B. L., 1956 [1940], Science and Linguistics, „Technology Review”, 42, s. 229–231. (Nauka a językoznawstwo. Fragmenty trzech tekstów ogłoszonych w latach 1940– 1941 na łamach „Technology Review”, w przekładzie Teresy Hołówki), http://www.sady.up.krakow.pl/antfil.whorf.htm (dostęp 05.04.18).

Wiggins D., 1967, Identity and Spatio-Temporal Continuity, Oxford, B. H. Blackwell.

Wilson D., Carston R., 2006, Metaphor, Relevance and the ‘Emergent Property’ Issue, „Mind & Language”, 21(3), s. 404–433.

Wilson D., Carston R., 2007, A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts, [w:] N. Burton-Roberts (red.), Pragmatics, (Palgrave Advances in Linguistics), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 230–260.

Wilson M., 2002, Six views of embodied cognition, „Psychonomic Bulletin and Review”, 9, s. 625–636.

Winner E., 1988, The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Woleński J., 2005, Epistemologia, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Wong R., 2013, The Fiction of the Science (Future of StoryTelling), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvgdKfWnYCg (dostęp 11.04.18).

Wyatt S., 2004, Danger! Metaphors at work in Economics, Geophysiology, and the Internet, „Science, Technologies, & Human Values”, 29(2), s. 242–261, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903261947.

Wygotski L. S., 2002, Wybrane prace psychologiczne II. Dzieciństwo i dorastanie, Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.

Zajonc R. B., 1985, Emotion and facial efference: A theory reclaimed, „Science”, 228, s. 15–21.

Zakay D., Block R. A., 1997, Temporal cognition, „Current Directions in Psychological Science”, 6, s. 12–16.

Załazińska A., 2001, Schematy myśli wyrażane w gestach, Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.

Zeidler P., 2013, Models and Metaphors as Research Tools in Science, LIT Verlag Münster, (Series: Development in Humanities, vol. 10).

Zemach E., 1994., Metaphors and ways of life, [w:] J. Hintikka (red.), Aspects of Metaphor, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, Netherlands, s. 243–254.

Ziemke T., 2003, What is that thing called embodiment?, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.529.2280&rep=rep1&type=pdf (dostęp 12.04.18).

Ziemke T., Frank R. M., 2007, Introduction: The body eclectic, [w:] T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev, I. R. M. Frank (red.), Body, Language and Mind. vol. 1: Embodiment, Berlin, New York: Mouton dr Gruyter, s. 1–13.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.